Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:54 PM Jul 2017

WH racing to stop Congress from sending Russia sanctions bill to Trump's desk that may tie his hands

WH racing to stop Congress from sending Russia sanctions bill to Trump's desk that may tie his hands in negotiations



(Make sure you read the last paragraph.)

... snip

In meetings in secure rooms, administration officials are quietly making the case to Republican members that the sanctions bill they rushed through the Senate on a 97-2 vote needs waivers to give Trump the flexibility to negotiate with Putin.

Administration officials believe the longer the bill gets delayed, the better their chances of convincing members that the bill is bad for diplomacy and bad for American companies — especially in the energy sector — who would be punished for doing international business with Russian companies.

Marc Short, whose White House legislative affairs team is working to amend the bill, says, "We support the sanctions on Iran and Russia; however, this bill is so poorly written that neither Republican nor Democratic administrations would be comfortable with the current draft because it greatly hampers the executive branch's diplomatic efforts."

Behind-the-scenes: Paul Ryan and House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Ed Royce want the bill passed fast, and in its tough current form. Both men are Russia hawks, and unlikely to insert waivers into the legislation just to make the White House happy. They will, however, take seriously the concerns of a range of U.S. companies, from Exxon to Boeing, who believe the current bill disadvantages American businesses.

GOP leadership isn't entirely on the same page. White House officials are still hopeful because they've found House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and John Cornyn in the Senate more open to their requests than other leaders, including Ryan.

The nightmare scenario for the White House: Trump is forced to either sign the bill, which would make it impossible to establish a broader cooperative relationship with Putin, or veto the bill and risk a two-thirds majority in Congress overriding his wishes.

Administration officials are acutely aware of the political pickle this puts them in. "He can't veto Russia sanctions," one told me. "Are you f---ing kidding me? Your first veto of the administration is to protect Russia?"

Link: https://www.axios.com/axios-sneak-peek-2455628998.html


Note: This is 4 paragraphs w/ the bullet points.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WH racing to stop Congress from sending Russia sanctions bill to Trump's desk that may tie his hands (Original Post) MelissaB Jul 2017 OP
Ryan a 'Russia hawk'? tanyev Jul 2017 #1
Wonder if he is going to go after Ryan "10 times as hard"? AgadorSparticus Jul 2017 #2
When POTUS is also Russian Asset, his authority to lift sanctions against Russia must be REVOKED... MedusaX Jul 2017 #3
Why the hell would you veto a bill that passed 97-2 ??? KelleyKramer Jul 2017 #4

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
3. When POTUS is also Russian Asset, his authority to lift sanctions against Russia must be REVOKED...
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 11:13 PM
Jul 2017

This should not be up for negotiation....

Every business that is whining about how awful this bill is relative to their profitability needs to suck it up ....
Sanctions are currently in place and obviously these businesses have somehow managed to survive ...
And if the profitability of these businesses are that dependent on Russia.... might be best that they either figure out a way to diversify or close up & go home.

IMO/FWIW...

KelleyKramer

(8,958 posts)
4. Why the hell would you veto a bill that passed 97-2 ???
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 01:15 AM
Jul 2017

Why are they even talking about a veto

The Senate could lose 20 votes and still override it

Idiots!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WH racing to stop Congres...