Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,823 posts)
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 08:28 AM Jul 2017

Chelsea Clinton responds to Trump (tweet):



Good morning Mr. President. It would never have occurred to my mother or my father to ask me. Were you giving our country away? Hoping not.



Edited to add the Trump tweet:


If Chelsea Clinton were asked to hold the seat for her mother,as her mother gave our country away, the Fake News would say CHELSEA FOR PRES!
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chelsea Clinton responds to Trump (tweet): (Original Post) demmiblue Jul 2017 OP
Great response!.. HipChick Jul 2017 #1
Yes! Sabrinao Jul 2017 #2
welcome to du niyad Jul 2017 #30
Pow.... Pachamama Jul 2017 #3
Do you remember how ballistic the Republicans became when Hillary Baitball Blogger Jul 2017 #4
Cuz the are partisan wacks and it's party over country. iluvtennis Jul 2017 #21
I remember very clearly. It was because she was, dare I say, a WOMAN! Oh No! BigmanPigman Jul 2017 #34
Because they are third grade bullies. Anything is OK... BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2017 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author SergeStorms Jul 2017 #45
This whole thing with Ivanka was planned ahead GusBob Jul 2017 #5
Yeah. It was planned. I am not sure why media is going along with the lie that Ivanka only sat SweetieD Jul 2017 #6
Yep. And after further consideration IF Chelsea had sat in GusBob Jul 2017 #7
Limbaugh would be apoplectic. lpbk2713 Jul 2017 #8
Paul Ryan NewJeffCT Jul 2017 #13
You nailed it malaise Jul 2017 #10
Yep. They project their own actions onto others and attack them for it. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2017 #38
The entire campaign shows that pattern malaise Jul 2017 #41
Yes! LOCK THEM UP!!! BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2017 #43
His defense is Chelsea Clinton.... LakeArenal Jul 2017 #9
He's already giving our country away. But at least this time he's not blaming the black guy. FailureToCommunicate Jul 2017 #11
He is a liar. mgardener Jul 2017 #12
Dont forget Ivanka hangs out with Putin's girlfriend NYC Liberal Jul 2017 #22
It's ok because Republicans love Russia now! Beartracks Jul 2017 #24
You mean Rupert Murdoch's ex-wife? GeoWilliam750 Jul 2017 #35
It is always about grifting. gademocrat7 Jul 2017 #14
LOL Chelsea can clearly run circles around Trump intellectually. PatrickforO Jul 2017 #15
I was told a long time ago that if you let people run their mouths, they'll tell you everything. Girard442 Jul 2017 #19
Chelsea's educational credentials are easy to look up, so I won't list them... maddiemom Jul 2017 #16
Yes she does. mgardener Jul 2017 #28
Good for her! mcar Jul 2017 #17
Hey tRUMP...you idiot... jaxind Jul 2017 #18
Bam! leftofcool Jul 2017 #20
Point and match. nolabear Jul 2017 #23
Chelsea Clinton has a PhD in International Relations. displacedtexan Jul 2017 #25
Perfect response - love the polite tone as she skewers him on his strange reference to selling out karynnj Jul 2017 #26
Here tweet has 2.5x as many likes as his too lololol Takket Jul 2017 #27
Point this out as often as possible gratuitous Jul 2017 #37
Trump's thinking is very shallow, just like on the playground. Thinkingabout Jul 2017 #29
Or the sandbox NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #31
Yes, Chelsea, Trump did give the country away. nt SunSeeker Jul 2017 #32
Deflection, always deflection. To say he's childish is an insult to children. nt raccoon Jul 2017 #33
Great response from Clinton, but everyone knows if the tables were turned Neema Jul 2017 #39
Love that Chelsea! calimary Jul 2017 #40
Chelsea beat his orange ass like a DRUM!!!!!!!!!!! LOLOL Takket Jul 2017 #42
Zinger. sarcasmo Jul 2017 #44

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
4. Do you remember how ballistic the Republicans became when Hillary
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 08:48 AM
Jul 2017

tried to help out with Healthcare reform when Bill was president? Why aren't Republicans criticizing Trump more loudly and boldly?

BigmanPigman

(51,567 posts)
34. I remember very clearly. It was because she was, dare I say, a WOMAN! Oh No!
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 02:46 PM
Jul 2017

"How dare she get involved in issues her pretty little head didn't understand" was their opinion. They thought she should go back to giving tours of the W House, etc.

She always was strong and tried to not let it offend her.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
36. Because they are third grade bullies. Anything is OK...
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 04:15 PM
Jul 2017

If it's *them* doing it.

And nothing their "enemies" (other kids on the playground. Or, fellow Americans) do can EVER be OK.

Response to Baitball Blogger (Reply #4)

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
5. This whole thing with Ivanka was planned ahead
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 08:52 AM
Jul 2017

This was no spur of the moment fill in.

They planned this to set up her political career( he expects people to say "Ivanka for Pres&quot , or help her business career.

This whole "If Chelsea" business is just deflection. I don't think she would've even been there

SweetieD

(1,660 posts)
6. Yeah. It was planned. I am not sure why media is going along with the lie that Ivanka only sat
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:08 AM
Jul 2017

in for a few minutes or that it was brief.


Supposedly she sat in on two occasions. We see two different pictures of her sitting in his seat in different rooms. But the one picture of her with the UK, Chinese, And German leaders was no accident. She intentionally sat in because it was part of the program where they discussed the womens entrepreneurship program with the world bank. So it wasn't as if she just happened to fill his seat.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
7. Yep. And after further consideration IF Chelsea had sat in
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:13 AM
Jul 2017

Everyone would be screaming hateful bloody murder. That's why HRC would never allow that to happen. Also a President Hillary Clinton understands proper diplomatic protocol

lpbk2713

(42,736 posts)
8. Limbaugh would be apoplectic.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:21 AM
Jul 2017



It would be his main story for weeks. It would become the new Benghazi.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
13. Paul Ryan
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:39 AM
Jul 2017

would have called a special session of Congress to investigate this outrageous breach of protocol and the media would have been so riled up that the senate would have voted 95-5 to condemn the action

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
38. Yep. They project their own actions onto others and attack them for it.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 04:19 PM
Jul 2017

So damn twisted. And comrade fatass has been doing that since the beginning.

LakeArenal

(28,802 posts)
9. His defense is Chelsea Clinton....
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:23 AM
Jul 2017

He just can't govern on his own. He's such a loser...

No ability to focus on anything more than....ooooo that dog has a fluffy tail...

FailureToCommunicate

(14,007 posts)
11. He's already giving our country away. But at least this time he's not blaming the black guy.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:33 AM
Jul 2017

So, there's that.

mgardener

(1,812 posts)
12. He is a liar.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:34 AM
Jul 2017

The Republicans would have raised holy hell if Chelsea Clinton did 1/10 of what Trump is making Ivanka do.
There would be cries of nepotism.
We need to remember that Ivanka Trump has a BA in business. She has no political experience. She has not been vetted by Congress. Has she divested from her businesses and the family business? We know she has contact with China. What is her experiences with Russia. Is she tied in with he husband's businesses?

It is important to contact your Congress people to let them know this is not acceptable.

Beartracks

(12,797 posts)
24. It's ok because Republicans love Russia now!
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 11:23 AM
Jul 2017

This is just an amazing coincidence. Yeah, that's it.



=================

GeoWilliam750

(2,521 posts)
35. You mean Rupert Murdoch's ex-wife?
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 03:47 PM
Jul 2017

Then the question becomes, "Why is Fox News so aggressively promoting the Russian narrative?"

PatrickforO

(14,558 posts)
15. LOL Chelsea can clearly run circles around Trump intellectually.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:50 AM
Jul 2017

It is the first clause of Trump's sentence that bothers me:'

If Chelsea Clinton were asked to hold the seat for her mother,as her mother gave our country away...'

I guess it bothered Chelsea too. Seems like a Freudian slip to me.

Sigh.

Trump isn't fit to be president. Clearly he has a different agenda than making 'Murika' great. Self-aggrandizement, using the treasury to profit personally...but not at all interested in governing.

Girard442

(6,065 posts)
19. I was told a long time ago that if you let people run their mouths, they'll tell you everything.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 10:37 AM
Jul 2017

I've found this to be quite true. Often, you don't even have to ask.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
16. Chelsea's educational credentials are easy to look up, so I won't list them...
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 09:59 AM
Jul 2017

however, I believe she has a doctorate in international relations. The Republicans still would have raised hell.

jaxind

(1,074 posts)
18. Hey tRUMP...you idiot...
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 10:14 AM
Jul 2017

Hey tRUMP, you idiot...could you even imagine how the rethuglicans would have reacted if Hilary (though she never would have) had asked Chelsea to do that?? The rethuglicans would have been shouting from the rooftops, you imbecile!

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
25. Chelsea Clinton has a PhD in International Relations.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 11:29 AM
Jul 2017

Ivanka runs sweatshops and sells knock-off purses and shoes.

Try again, Orange Man.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
26. Perfect response - love the polite tone as she skewers him on his strange reference to selling out
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 11:32 AM
Jul 2017

the country.

Remember when he spoke of how any Republican running would consider Ivanka for the cabinet? He even gave her as the only example of a woman he would put in the cabinet, apparently not knowing he couldn't. http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/clinton-trump-ivanka-cabinet/index.html

I suspect that he thinks he can spin Ivanka sitting in for him - rather than someone from his cabinet - as an attack on someone he sees as very popular. As seen by thinking she would be a popularly acclaimed choice as a cabinet member - not knowing that the law forbids that - he stills feels that everyone will see her as exceptionally qualified.

One thing Chelsea, who is someone who could be included in a future administration under a President she is not related to, makes clear is that it is NOT a matter of credentials. This was an international summit of world leaders. Ivanka could substitute for Melania at a ceremonial event -- and Chelsea could have done that as well. We are not a monarchy, there is no throne, and the Presidential offspring are not the heirs.

Takket

(21,528 posts)
27. Here tweet has 2.5x as many likes as his too lololol
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 11:37 AM
Jul 2017

Makes sense considering only about 30 percent actually support him.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
37. Point this out as often as possible
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 04:19 PM
Jul 2017

Nothing will get under President Trump's skin faster than other people being more popular than him.

Neema

(1,151 posts)
39. Great response from Clinton, but everyone knows if the tables were turned
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 04:20 PM
Jul 2017

Fox News, the GOP and their idiot minions would be SCREAMING FOR BLOOD. Virtually every day 45 commits an offense that would have caused a complete government shutdown if Clinton, or Obama or any other Democratic president did the same.

Takket

(21,528 posts)
42. Chelsea beat his orange ass like a DRUM!!!!!!!!!!! LOLOL
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 06:29 PM
Jul 2017

128k to 20k RTs
350k to 80k favs

Almost whooped his ass as hard as her mom did!!!!!!!!!!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chelsea Clinton responds ...