Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 03:18 PM Jul 2017

Macron popularity plummets for his crude racism ahead of Trump visit...

It may sink even lower after Trump visits..The foreign press pull no punches...

Social media lynchings are as hyperbolic as they sound, but Emmanuel Macron got all the metaphorical violence he deserved when he suggested that poor African women have too many babies. The newly elected French President used a press conference at the G20 summit in Hamburg to say that wanton reproduction often made foreign aid pointless.
“Seven or eight children per woman,” were Macron’s exact words, as he rehearsed a canard that is particularly popular among nostalgic colonialists who still speak of the Dark Continent. There was even a clumsy reference to the “civilisational” problems that result from an escalating birthrate, not least of all mass immigration to western countries.
Macron was torn apart on Twitter and Facebook for his crude racism, but there was generally silence from France’s establishment. This is because imperial attitudes prevail in a country that has by no means altered its condescending approach towards those it subjugated, often with immense barbarism.

<SNIP>
Furthermore, his glad-handling of American President Donald Trump, the charlatan now occupying the most powerful executive position on earth, would suggest that Macron is more than happy to overlook hateful bigotry for political gain. They will be buddying up in Paris at the end of this week, after Macron invited his US counterpart to this year’s Bastille Day parade.

There will be plenty of internet venom aimed at the pair, and indeed mass street protests across the capital. Many will say that a discriminatory oaf like Trump has no place in a cosmopolitan city like Paris. The truth, however, is that his more extreme views have far more in common with traditional French ideologies concerning allegedly lesser races than they would care to admit

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/emmanuel-macron-africa-france-colonial-past-not-that-liberal-a7836056.html

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Macron popularity plummets for his crude racism ahead of Trump visit... (Original Post) HipChick Jul 2017 OP
Oh men, men, men.. can't help themselves. mountain grammy Jul 2017 #1
Did you see how they referred to Trump? an Oaf... HipChick Jul 2017 #2
I guess that makes Marine Le Pen the dumbest man of all emulatorloo Jul 2017 #4
+1 whathehell Jul 2017 #5
That's true, but, sadly, for the most part men have the power mountain grammy Jul 2017 #69
Nothing new the French have always had that rap lunasun Jul 2017 #3
I had no idea and this is very upsetting. I thought he was a good Maraya1969 Jul 2017 #6
Me too .... WTF hope it was a bad translation YCHDT Jul 2017 #13
Say it ain't so. Guess will have to go back to crushing on Trudeau. kerry-is-my-prez Jul 2017 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2017 #51
I agree with Macron BannonsLiver Jul 2017 #7
Yeah, I picked up on that, too. 7 or 8 per WOMAN? LisaM Jul 2017 #10
It sounds odd Maybe this was simply based on a scientific notion of birth rate? Ezior Jul 2017 #12
Just got back from a trip to Pakistan dhol82 Jul 2017 #49
That's what it was. Igel Jul 2017 #53
I would be behind it if he was talking about the Duggars.... kerry-is-my-prez Jul 2017 #33
Ugh, I know. LisaM Jul 2017 #44
Probably because you can count the babies popping out of a woman. dhol82 Jul 2017 #50
Education, rising incomes, and easy access to birth control... Spider Jerusalem Jul 2017 #19
Good points. BannonsLiver Jul 2017 #23
And yet the US birthrate overall is below replacement level (1.86 children per woman). Spider Jerusalem Jul 2017 #24
I live in the South, Florida. Blue_true Jul 2017 #59
That's a point that gets consistently ignored in repetively dumbfuck "population" debates. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #25
This was what Margaret Sanger was saying in 1920 ProudLib72 Jul 2017 #46
People like to drag her name through the mud to attack PP, I do know that. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #63
Certainly ProudLib72 Jul 2017 #64
Well, authoritarians have a whole list of tricks in the bag, from religious dogma to fear/oppression Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #65
Those two words do NOT apply to tRump and his gang! nt ProudLib72 Jul 2017 #67
The cashing of that Karma Check Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #68
You want to stop overpopulation? customerserviceguy Jul 2017 #30
First those societies will produce a lot of angry, horny teenage boys w/nothing to do on sat night. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #35
All the things you mention customerserviceguy Jul 2017 #37
Either way, point being that improved standards of living + reproductive freedom/autonomy Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #45
I agree with your chart customerserviceguy Jul 2017 #61
Sounds awesome. To whom do I make the check out to? BannonsLiver Jul 2017 #38
Maybe it could be crowdfunded customerserviceguy Jul 2017 #39
Maybe if we provided all women with sex education, free birth control & access to abortion, CrispyQ Jul 2017 #8
+1000 WhiteTara Jul 2017 #14
THERE YA GO! tavernier Jul 2017 #15
+1 leftstreet Jul 2017 #16
Hypocrites one and all. billh58 Jul 2017 #18
Thank you Delmette2.0 Jul 2017 #22
People who try and tell others how many kids they should be "allowed" to have are assholes- Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #26
No. That's not what I said. CrispyQ Jul 2017 #28
Oh. Well, I agree with your statement. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #29
A difference of perspective, perhaps. CrispyQ Jul 2017 #34
I am unapologetically pro choice. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #36
Let's just provide all women with Krav Maga. displacedtexan Jul 2017 #41
+infinity ismnotwasm Jul 2017 #43
Yes, please. Solly Mack Jul 2017 #66
. PunkinPi Jul 2017 #72
Sometimes sex is the only pleasure you have in your life. Understand what many of these people face nikibatts Jul 2017 #9
That is not how he should approach and describe this issue Ezior Jul 2017 #11
I wonder where he got that number. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author m-lekktor Jul 2017 #20
Were those poor African women Catholic? panader0 Jul 2017 #21
India is down to about 2.2 children per family now. roamer65 Jul 2017 #27
Industrialization hasn't hurt, either customerserviceguy Jul 2017 #31
FAKE NEWS! joeybee12 Jul 2017 #40
Speech was at the G20 summit... HipChick Jul 2017 #42
Yeah, and the article only has half quotes from him taken joeybee12 Jul 2017 #47
Here's a viewpoint, written by a French Black person.. HipChick Jul 2017 #48
I'd like to see a transcript of the exact question asked by the African journalist lapucelle Jul 2017 #57
It wasn't a speech. lapucelle Jul 2017 #58
Oh shit!!! And I thought we had a good guy! nt LAS14 Jul 2017 #52
God. Why don't these people think their thoughts before they say them? DK504 Jul 2017 #54
It would help if our foreign-aid funded "missionaries" didn't condemn condom users to Hell. Crash2Parties Jul 2017 #55
More proof that even "intelligent" people can be ignorant racists too. We need to call out racism... JoeOtterbein Jul 2017 #56
Macron and his wife chose not to have children Not Ruth Jul 2017 #60
I read his comments in French GulfCoast66 Jul 2017 #62
The French are more pissed off at him for inviting our idiot to Bastille Day dalton99a Jul 2017 #70
the low popularity is more likely because he invited Trump JI7 Jul 2017 #71
11/9/2016: This author, Nabila Ramdani, tweeted this crap on Hillary Clinton's loss... VOX Jul 2017 #73

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
1. Oh men, men, men.. can't help themselves.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 03:31 PM
Jul 2017

This from the article:

"There were high hopes that Macron would buck this macho trend, but all the indications are that he jolts into unthinking reactionary mode worryingly easily."


very interesting, thanks for posting.

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
69. That's true, but, sadly, for the most part men have the power
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 12:20 AM
Jul 2017

and have remained that way by controlling women. Things are changing, but it may already be too late.

Maraya1969

(22,478 posts)
6. I had no idea and this is very upsetting. I thought he was a good
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:01 PM
Jul 2017

guy. Never thought he would be a fucked up racist.

Geeze.

Response to Maraya1969 (Reply #6)

BannonsLiver

(16,369 posts)
7. I agree with Macron
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:05 PM
Jul 2017

But with two exceptions.

1-Last time I checked it took sperm to make a baby. Two to tango. It should not all be on women to prevent unwanted children.

2-Nobody, regardless of where they live, should be giving birth to 7 or 8 children. This is not exclusive to Africa.

The world doesn't need that many "little miracles" at the moment.

LisaM

(27,801 posts)
10. Yeah, I picked up on that, too. 7 or 8 per WOMAN?
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:12 PM
Jul 2017

I agree that nobody should be having that many children, though of course, it's far more complex an issue in areas where poor families need the labor of their families to survive, and of course, infant and child mortality can be high, too. But to say "per woman" is just fundamentally tone deaf on prima facie.

Ezior

(505 posts)
12. It sounds odd Maybe this was simply based on a scientific notion of birth rate?
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:19 PM
Jul 2017

I know the birth rate of a country is sometimes given as "x.x births per woman on average", so maybe he used that same wording to describe families with 7 or 8 kids without thinking too much about it? (Or is this REALLY the birth rate in some places? Like 7.5 births per woman? Seems a lot, but I'm not too well informed about this topic.)

dhol82

(9,352 posts)
49. Just got back from a trip to Pakistan
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:55 PM
Jul 2017

My driver was bragging about his 11 children.
Not uncommon.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
53. That's what it was.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:10 PM
Jul 2017

Except his numbers are out of date. Sub-Saharan numbers seem to average 4-5. Niger's at 7 for 2014.

That's average per woman.

LisaM

(27,801 posts)
44. Ugh, I know.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:59 PM
Jul 2017

But the point I was thinking of is why does he get into how many children a woman bears, versus how many a male sires (for lack of a better term at the moment). Why isn't he quantifying it by number of children per male?

dhol82

(9,352 posts)
50. Probably because you can count the babies popping out of a woman.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:57 PM
Jul 2017

Sperm are much more indiscriminate.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
19. Education, rising incomes, and easy access to birth control...
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:56 PM
Jul 2017

are responsible for declining birth rates in the West. It's not all that long ago that it was extremely common for families to have seven or eight children (my grandmother, who was born in 1923, was one of eight children). Africa continues to have a high birthrate because Africa continues to be one of the poorest parts of the world. Saying "Africa has a civilisational problem" is just exhibiting profound ignorance.

BannonsLiver

(16,369 posts)
23. Good points.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 05:13 PM
Jul 2017

But it still happens here. Spend some time at a Golden Corral on Sundays after church in the south and midwest and you'll see what I mean. Obviously statistically we know birth rates are declining, but there are still a big swath of people who believe in that quiver movement bullshit.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
24. And yet the US birthrate overall is below replacement level (1.86 children per woman).
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:42 PM
Jul 2017

Child mortality is another issue in low-income countries; life expectancy in the US is 79, in most of Africa it's below 60, and infant mortality, deaths in childbirth, pandemic HIV and malnutrition are all part of that (lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality also tend to lead to higher birth rates).

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
59. I live in the South, Florida.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:38 PM
Jul 2017

Ok, FloriDUH, but the educated women here typically don't have more than two children, some only one, some none. I see bigger families from women of all races that seem to be poor from the way they tend to dress and the way some of the kids seem cared for. The issue seems to correlate more to poverty than to race.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. That's a point that gets consistently ignored in repetively dumbfuck "population" debates.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:43 PM
Jul 2017

Given female access to contraception, freedom and independence from governmental, religious, social and even spousal "authorities", and a decent standard of living, etc the so-called "population problem" manages itself just fine.

What we should be focusing on in areas where the birth rate is still high, is greater access to health care, contraception, sanitation, food, etc.



ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
46. This was what Margaret Sanger was saying in 1920
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:28 PM
Jul 2017

She was talking about impoverished American women primarily, but we could easily extend that to the global level.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
63. People like to drag her name through the mud to attack PP, I do know that.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 11:43 PM
Jul 2017

Fact is, more choice, more options, more freedom are good for everyone and achieve better results in the long run. Even leaving aside philosophical considerations, I stand consistently in favor of improving lives and expanding choice and freedom.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
64. Certainly
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 12:06 AM
Jul 2017

The problem is that removing those options keeps oppressive governments in control. Keep the people poor and distracted by having a lot of babies (who end up being sick all the time because the parents cannot afford to give them proper care). Here is the kicker. The term for controlling the population in order to improve its health is eugenics. It is a term that Sanger freely used in describing her program. Taken to the extreme, however, we know what eugenics entails. That is exactly what the oppressive governments want you to associate with birth control. It's absurd, of course, but idiots like Ben Carson still argue this point: http://www.politifact.com/new-hampshire/statements/2015/oct/05/ben-carson/did-margaret-sanger-believe-african-americans-shou/

So what is it called when an oppressive government controls the population by not allowing birth control and access to decent healthcare for pregnant women/mothers/children? For our country it's called "republicanism".

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
65. Well, authoritarians have a whole list of tricks in the bag, from religious dogma to fear/oppression
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 12:12 AM
Jul 2017

But we have the most powerful two words in Western thought: Non Serviam.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
30. You want to stop overpopulation?
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:03 PM
Jul 2017

Fund science to develop an orally administered drug that virtually guarantees the conception of a male child. Make it available on the black market everywhere for a pittance.

In two or three generations, the most sexist, backwards societies on the planet will breed themselves out of existence. Or, they'll change, and start to value the girl babies that are produced. That will lead to educating them, and trying a bit harder to make sure they marry into good families that don't abuse the women in them.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
35. First those societies will produce a lot of angry, horny teenage boys w/nothing to do on sat night.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:28 PM
Jul 2017

We already know what solves the "population problem"- because it has worked in the first world. Freedom, relatively secular societies, reproductive choice, access to contraception, higher standards of living, female autonomy, etc.

Birth rates manage themselves organically in those circumstances.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
37. All the things you mention
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:33 PM
Jul 2017

come with changing from an agricultural economy to a manufacturing, then service economy.

And those horny teenage boys who have nobody else to entertain their genitals can thank their parents' generation.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
45. Either way, point being that improved standards of living + reproductive freedom/autonomy
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:14 PM
Jul 2017

are a proven way to achieve replacement or lower fertility rates in a relatively short order of time.



Your solution involves waiting however long for these male-heavy societies to 'die out', practical considerations in a mobile globe notwithstanding. The most charitable thing I can come up with about your idea is, it seems impractical at best. At least, for achieving your stated aims.

However, someone could probably get rich selling the drug you've imagined, ethical considerations aside. Knock yourself out.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
61. I agree with your chart
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:32 PM
Jul 2017

But the only thing we can't prove is which came first, industrialization or lower birthrates. A classic chicken-and-egg situation.

It would only take about two generations to do away with societies that have persisted in ignorance and sexism for many centuries. Once you've got a small female population of child-bearing age, declines in the overall birthrate for the entire population will plummet.

And as far as mobility goes, if most of those men could escape to more prosperous societies to find a mate, they'd be doing it already for economic reasons. I don't see how you entice First World women to live subjugated under Third World conditions long enough to have more than one or two children. And then, those children would be raised by a mother who knows there's a better way to live.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
39. Maybe it could be crowdfunded
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:44 PM
Jul 2017

Ideally, the governments of the Western world should jointly fund it, but if any group of serious scientists say that they could do it, I'd be writing a check, too. However, it would be most effective to be done covertly. Sounds like a job for DARPA.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
8. Maybe if we provided all women with sex education, free birth control & access to abortion,
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:10 PM
Jul 2017

the men could shut the fuck up with their patriarchal, judgmental assholery.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
18. Hypocrites one and all.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:55 PM
Jul 2017

No funding for birth control or abortions, but plenty of scorn and penalties for women who often have no say in becoming pregnant.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
28. No. That's not what I said.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:56 PM
Jul 2017

I said, all women should be provided with sex education & free BC & access to abortion.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
29. Oh. Well, I agree with your statement.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:01 PM
Jul 2017

I'm not sure what part of "people who try and tell others how many children they should be allowed to have are assholes" is objectionable, though.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
34. A difference of perspective, perhaps.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:26 PM
Jul 2017

You are macro, and spot on with your belief that people should not tell others how many children they can have.

I am micro, and have experienced, personally, obstacles to that very choice, you & I believe women have.

I appreciate your reasoned response.

~handshake

 

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)
9. Sometimes sex is the only pleasure you have in your life. Understand what many of these people face
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:11 PM
Jul 2017

I guess the Catholic church will be getting hit next by Macron.

Ezior

(505 posts)
11. That is not how he should approach and describe this issue
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 04:13 PM
Jul 2017

Really, shocking.

Though I'd say that the growing world population is a huge issue for this planet, as we're already depleting our natural resources too quickly. So I'm a strong supporter of birth control in Europe, America, Africa, Australia, Asia and elsewhere . The catholic church got this wrong, but China's one-child policy was 10x wrong in the opposite direction.

Response to HipChick (Original post)

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
27. India is down to about 2.2 children per family now.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 06:48 PM
Jul 2017

Aggressive family reproductive counseling and birth control measures are working. Africa is next.

One planet, one child!

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
31. Industrialization hasn't hurt, either
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:07 PM
Jul 2017

In an agricultural society, large families are desirable (more hands to plant, tend the crops, and bring in the harvest, in industrial and service economies, they are an often unaffordable luxury.

"Be fruitful and mulitply" was from the handbook of a guide designed around moving from a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural one.

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
42. Speech was at the G20 summit...
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 07:48 PM
Jul 2017

Independent is not exactly the sole source for news...

I hate that DU'ers take Trumps lead and act as if other DU'ers are dumber than rocks..


http://wunc.org/post/macron-got-lot-wrong-about-africa-made-one-good-point

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
47. Yeah, and the article only has half quotes from him taken
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 08:28 PM
Jul 2017

Out of context and lots of paraphrasing. I hate it when DUers try to justify their own viewpoint by linking to trash sources

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
57. I'd like to see a transcript of the exact question asked by the African journalist
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:18 PM
Jul 2017

and Macron's complete answer in the original French. I don't trust translated partial statements taken out of context.

I've been looking for a transcript all day.



DK504

(3,847 posts)
54. God. Why don't these people think their thoughts before they say them?
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:11 PM
Jul 2017

" ... when asked in a press conference at the G20 summit in Hamburg why there was no Marshall plan for Africa, explained that Africa had “civilisational” problems. He added that part of the challenge facing the continent was the countries that “still have seven to eight children per woman”.

That is a great question. Problem is these women have no access to health care, no access to contraception and their education isn't the best in the world. These former colonies were set up to fail when the empires were kicked out. They abused the citizens for so long they finally were tossed out and their oppressors made sure there was no infrastructure in place for education, medicine, agriculture and now we wonder why things are so bad in Africa.

We are allowing America to become a former colony state.

Sweet mother, the only former colony that has succeeded is Hong Kong and I wonder if that is because of the financial power house it was and because they made sure Beijing stayed away.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
55. It would help if our foreign-aid funded "missionaries" didn't condemn condom users to Hell.
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:12 PM
Jul 2017

Regardless of Macron's statements, people who live in poverty often do not have access to adequate contraception. And when we as a nation spend our foreign aid funds on "Faith Based Initiatives" that spread lies about condom use, the problem gets much, much worse. With the money we've spent doing so, we could've provided free birth control for many of the nations most affected.

JoeOtterbein

(7,700 posts)
56. More proof that even "intelligent" people can be ignorant racists too. We need to call out racism...
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 09:14 PM
Jul 2017

...wherever we witness it. Even if we personally like the racist. I've done it with people I like and respect, I feel no need to stop now.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
62. I read his comments in French
Wed Jul 12, 2017, 10:57 PM
Jul 2017

And while my French is admittedly spotty, I think some people may be placing our language and culture on the French.

There are very, very few French people, right or left who will disagree that having 7-8 kids is a bad idea. And the French are also more educated and better read than us. In the US a politician, especially one on the left, would just say that the women of Africa need control over their bodies. That includes easy conception, abortion rights and most importantly, the right to say no to sex to her partner. The French language can be more direct and the French people are smart enough to figure it out. They know that women in many African countries have limited rights.

I think having lots of kids when the woman has no say on the issue is a problem if your are American, European, African, Asian or any other thing.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
71. the low popularity is more likely because he invited Trump
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 04:30 AM
Jul 2017

i actually don't think his comments would hurt him.

VOX

(22,976 posts)
73. 11/9/2016: This author, Nabila Ramdani, tweeted this crap on Hillary Clinton's loss...
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 08:26 AM
Jul 2017


So I'm not too disposed to be a fan of the author right off the bat.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Macron popularity plummet...