General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMacron popularity plummets for his crude racism ahead of Trump visit...
It may sink even lower after Trump visits..The foreign press pull no punches...
Social media lynchings are as hyperbolic as they sound, but Emmanuel Macron got all the metaphorical violence he deserved when he suggested that poor African women have too many babies. The newly elected French President used a press conference at the G20 summit in Hamburg to say that wanton reproduction often made foreign aid pointless.
Seven or eight children per woman, were Macrons exact words, as he rehearsed a canard that is particularly popular among nostalgic colonialists who still speak of the Dark Continent. There was even a clumsy reference to the civilisational problems that result from an escalating birthrate, not least of all mass immigration to western countries.
Macron was torn apart on Twitter and Facebook for his crude racism, but there was generally silence from Frances establishment. This is because imperial attitudes prevail in a country that has by no means altered its condescending approach towards those it subjugated, often with immense barbarism.
<SNIP>
Furthermore, his glad-handling of American President Donald Trump, the charlatan now occupying the most powerful executive position on earth, would suggest that Macron is more than happy to overlook hateful bigotry for political gain. They will be buddying up in Paris at the end of this week, after Macron invited his US counterpart to this years Bastille Day parade.
There will be plenty of internet venom aimed at the pair, and indeed mass street protests across the capital. Many will say that a discriminatory oaf like Trump has no place in a cosmopolitan city like Paris. The truth, however, is that his more extreme views have far more in common with traditional French ideologies concerning allegedly lesser races than they would care to admit
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/emmanuel-macron-africa-france-colonial-past-not-that-liberal-a7836056.html
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)This from the article:
very interesting, thanks for posting.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)Sadly idiocy has no hormonal boundaries
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)and have remained that way by controlling women. Things are changing, but it may already be too late.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Maraya1969
(22,478 posts)guy. Never thought he would be a fucked up racist.
Geeze.
YCHDT
(962 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Response to Maraya1969 (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)But with two exceptions.
1-Last time I checked it took sperm to make a baby. Two to tango. It should not all be on women to prevent unwanted children.
2-Nobody, regardless of where they live, should be giving birth to 7 or 8 children. This is not exclusive to Africa.
The world doesn't need that many "little miracles" at the moment.
LisaM
(27,801 posts)I agree that nobody should be having that many children, though of course, it's far more complex an issue in areas where poor families need the labor of their families to survive, and of course, infant and child mortality can be high, too. But to say "per woman" is just fundamentally tone deaf on prima facie.
Ezior
(505 posts)I know the birth rate of a country is sometimes given as "x.x births per woman on average", so maybe he used that same wording to describe families with 7 or 8 kids without thinking too much about it? (Or is this REALLY the birth rate in some places? Like 7.5 births per woman? Seems a lot, but I'm not too well informed about this topic.)
dhol82
(9,352 posts)My driver was bragging about his 11 children.
Not uncommon.
Igel
(35,300 posts)Except his numbers are out of date. Sub-Saharan numbers seem to average 4-5. Niger's at 7 for 2014.
That's average per woman.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)LisaM
(27,801 posts)But the point I was thinking of is why does he get into how many children a woman bears, versus how many a male sires (for lack of a better term at the moment). Why isn't he quantifying it by number of children per male?
dhol82
(9,352 posts)Sperm are much more indiscriminate.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)are responsible for declining birth rates in the West. It's not all that long ago that it was extremely common for families to have seven or eight children (my grandmother, who was born in 1923, was one of eight children). Africa continues to have a high birthrate because Africa continues to be one of the poorest parts of the world. Saying "Africa has a civilisational problem" is just exhibiting profound ignorance.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)But it still happens here. Spend some time at a Golden Corral on Sundays after church in the south and midwest and you'll see what I mean. Obviously statistically we know birth rates are declining, but there are still a big swath of people who believe in that quiver movement bullshit.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Child mortality is another issue in low-income countries; life expectancy in the US is 79, in most of Africa it's below 60, and infant mortality, deaths in childbirth, pandemic HIV and malnutrition are all part of that (lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality also tend to lead to higher birth rates).
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Ok, FloriDUH, but the educated women here typically don't have more than two children, some only one, some none. I see bigger families from women of all races that seem to be poor from the way they tend to dress and the way some of the kids seem cared for. The issue seems to correlate more to poverty than to race.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Given female access to contraception, freedom and independence from governmental, religious, social and even spousal "authorities", and a decent standard of living, etc the so-called "population problem" manages itself just fine.
What we should be focusing on in areas where the birth rate is still high, is greater access to health care, contraception, sanitation, food, etc.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)She was talking about impoverished American women primarily, but we could easily extend that to the global level.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Fact is, more choice, more options, more freedom are good for everyone and achieve better results in the long run. Even leaving aside philosophical considerations, I stand consistently in favor of improving lives and expanding choice and freedom.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)The problem is that removing those options keeps oppressive governments in control. Keep the people poor and distracted by having a lot of babies (who end up being sick all the time because the parents cannot afford to give them proper care). Here is the kicker. The term for controlling the population in order to improve its health is eugenics. It is a term that Sanger freely used in describing her program. Taken to the extreme, however, we know what eugenics entails. That is exactly what the oppressive governments want you to associate with birth control. It's absurd, of course, but idiots like Ben Carson still argue this point: http://www.politifact.com/new-hampshire/statements/2015/oct/05/ben-carson/did-margaret-sanger-believe-african-americans-shou/
So what is it called when an oppressive government controls the population by not allowing birth control and access to decent healthcare for pregnant women/mothers/children? For our country it's called "republicanism".
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But we have the most powerful two words in Western thought: Non Serviam.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)They will serve... time in prison.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)...truly, a sight to behold if and when it finally comes due.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Fund science to develop an orally administered drug that virtually guarantees the conception of a male child. Make it available on the black market everywhere for a pittance.
In two or three generations, the most sexist, backwards societies on the planet will breed themselves out of existence. Or, they'll change, and start to value the girl babies that are produced. That will lead to educating them, and trying a bit harder to make sure they marry into good families that don't abuse the women in them.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)We already know what solves the "population problem"- because it has worked in the first world. Freedom, relatively secular societies, reproductive choice, access to contraception, higher standards of living, female autonomy, etc.
Birth rates manage themselves organically in those circumstances.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)come with changing from an agricultural economy to a manufacturing, then service economy.
And those horny teenage boys who have nobody else to entertain their genitals can thank their parents' generation.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)are a proven way to achieve replacement or lower fertility rates in a relatively short order of time.
Your solution involves waiting however long for these male-heavy societies to 'die out', practical considerations in a mobile globe notwithstanding. The most charitable thing I can come up with about your idea is, it seems impractical at best. At least, for achieving your stated aims.
However, someone could probably get rich selling the drug you've imagined, ethical considerations aside. Knock yourself out.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)But the only thing we can't prove is which came first, industrialization or lower birthrates. A classic chicken-and-egg situation.
It would only take about two generations to do away with societies that have persisted in ignorance and sexism for many centuries. Once you've got a small female population of child-bearing age, declines in the overall birthrate for the entire population will plummet.
And as far as mobility goes, if most of those men could escape to more prosperous societies to find a mate, they'd be doing it already for economic reasons. I don't see how you entice First World women to live subjugated under Third World conditions long enough to have more than one or two children. And then, those children would be raised by a mother who knows there's a better way to live.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Ideally, the governments of the Western world should jointly fund it, but if any group of serious scientists say that they could do it, I'd be writing a check, too. However, it would be most effective to be done covertly. Sounds like a job for DARPA.
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)the men could shut the fuck up with their patriarchal, judgmental assholery.
tavernier
(12,377 posts)Yes, the shouting is intentional.
billh58
(6,635 posts)No funding for birth control or abortions, but plenty of scorn and penalties for women who often have no say in becoming pregnant.
Delmette2.0
(4,164 posts)That is the perfect response.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)agreed.
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)I said, all women should be provided with sex education & free BC & access to abortion.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm not sure what part of "people who try and tell others how many children they should be allowed to have are assholes" is objectionable, though.
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)You are macro, and spot on with your belief that people should not tell others how many children they can have.
I am micro, and have experienced, personally, obstacles to that very choice, you & I believe women have.
I appreciate your reasoned response.
~handshake
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)At the micro and macro levels. Peace.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)That should take care of a lot of problems.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)nikibatts
(2,198 posts)I guess the Catholic church will be getting hit next by Macron.
Ezior
(505 posts)Really, shocking.
Though I'd say that the growing world population is a huge issue for this planet, as we're already depleting our natural resources too quickly. So I'm a strong supporter of birth control in Europe, America, Africa, Australia, Asia and elsewhere . The catholic church got this wrong, but China's one-child policy was 10x wrong in the opposite direction.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)World Bank/UN Fertility Rate data, perhaps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_total_fertility_rate
Response to HipChick (Original post)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
panader0
(25,816 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)Aggressive family reproductive counseling and birth control measures are working. Africa is next.
One planet, one child!
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)In an agricultural society, large families are desirable (more hands to plant, tend the crops, and bring in the harvest, in industrial and service economies, they are an often unaffordable luxury.
"Be fruitful and mulitply" was from the handbook of a guide designed around moving from a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural one.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)All bullshit. All made up. The independent was bought by a Russian oligarch in 2010.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Independent is not exactly the sole source for news...
I hate that DU'ers take Trumps lead and act as if other DU'ers are dumber than rocks..
http://wunc.org/post/macron-got-lot-wrong-about-africa-made-one-good-point
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Out of context and lots of paraphrasing. I hate it when DUers try to justify their own viewpoint by linking to trash sources
HipChick
(25,485 posts)anytime a black person has to explain why something is racist....
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/11/slur-africans-macron-radical-pretence-over
lapucelle
(18,250 posts)and Macron's complete answer in the original French. I don't trust translated partial statements taken out of context.
I've been looking for a transcript all day.
lapucelle
(18,250 posts)It was part of an answer to a question from an African journalist.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)" ... when asked in a press conference at the G20 summit in Hamburg why there was no Marshall plan for Africa, explained that Africa had civilisational problems. He added that part of the challenge facing the continent was the countries that still have seven to eight children per woman.
That is a great question. Problem is these women have no access to health care, no access to contraception and their education isn't the best in the world. These former colonies were set up to fail when the empires were kicked out. They abused the citizens for so long they finally were tossed out and their oppressors made sure there was no infrastructure in place for education, medicine, agriculture and now we wonder why things are so bad in Africa.
We are allowing America to become a former colony state.
Sweet mother, the only former colony that has succeeded is Hong Kong and I wonder if that is because of the financial power house it was and because they made sure Beijing stayed away.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Regardless of Macron's statements, people who live in poverty often do not have access to adequate contraception. And when we as a nation spend our foreign aid funds on "Faith Based Initiatives" that spread lies about condom use, the problem gets much, much worse. With the money we've spent doing so, we could've provided free birth control for many of the nations most affected.
JoeOtterbein
(7,700 posts)...wherever we witness it. Even if we personally like the racist. I've done it with people I like and respect, I feel no need to stop now.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)She already had a few from a previous union
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)And while my French is admittedly spotty, I think some people may be placing our language and culture on the French.
There are very, very few French people, right or left who will disagree that having 7-8 kids is a bad idea. And the French are also more educated and better read than us. In the US a politician, especially one on the left, would just say that the women of Africa need control over their bodies. That includes easy conception, abortion rights and most importantly, the right to say no to sex to her partner. The French language can be more direct and the French people are smart enough to figure it out. They know that women in many African countries have limited rights.
I think having lots of kids when the woman has no say on the issue is a problem if your are American, European, African, Asian or any other thing.
dalton99a
(81,451 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)i actually don't think his comments would hurt him.