Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,236 posts)
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 11:13 PM Jul 2017

Lindsey Graham: Trump could appoint four Supreme Court justices

Alex Pappas
Published July 13, 2017 Fox News

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Thursday he believes it’s possible President Trump could name as many as four justices to the Supreme Court during his presidency.

“We could have four Supreme Court picks on Trump’s watch,” Graham said Thursday in Washington at a private event sponsored by a political action committee for young conservatives. “Do you understand how big that is for y’all?” ...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/13/lindsey-graham-trump-could-appoint-four-supreme-court-justices-during-presidency.html


What could be better than a guy -- who couldn't win a majority of the vote, even with foreign help -- dominating the courts with his appointments? Lindsey is lining up bodies behind the barricades in the fight for DC



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lindsey Graham: Trump could appoint four Supreme Court justices (Original Post) struggle4progress Jul 2017 OP
And he could push the red button, too. McCamy Taylor Jul 2017 #1
that's just swell... NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #2
People should never think LG is a halfway decent anything. Solly Mack Jul 2017 #3
+1 dalton99a Jul 2017 #6
Yep. Same with him, too. Solly Mack Jul 2017 #8
"People should never think LG is a halfway decent anything." LenaBaby61 Jul 2017 #16
Me neither. Never saw any reason to think better of him. Solly Mack Jul 2017 #17
The next Democratic president and the next Democratic Senate should expand the Supreme Court dalton99a Jul 2017 #4
FDR tried that in 1937. It didn't end well. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #10
And this is why Proud liberal 80 Jul 2017 #5
Yep.... AJT Jul 2017 #9
That is why it is so important to take back Congress and block the fuck out of all of them Tiggeroshii Jul 2017 #7
I saw this thread and my stomach literally turned. so sick. riversedge Jul 2017 #11
Or he could only have Gorsuch, or he "could" get two, or he "could" get three, or four, or five... Freethinker65 Jul 2017 #12
Sorry John Mc's BBF Ccarmona Jul 2017 #13
It's the last year of dRumpf's term, so we should hold off confirming his choices.... lastlib Jul 2017 #14
Also, the Trump 2020 campaign has already started Ezior Jul 2017 #18
Dream: Drumpf takes revenge on his own & names Libs UTUSN Jul 2017 #15
I don't feel any better if Pence names them.... Funtatlaguy Jul 2017 #19
Is Lindsay Graham revealing that the RNC has a plan to keep the Senate republican no_hypocrisy Jul 2017 #20

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
1. And he could push the red button, too.
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 11:16 PM
Jul 2017

Not sure which would be worse. Wonder how much other countries would pay him to nuke their enemies versus how much he can charge for a SCOTUS nominee?

dalton99a

(81,406 posts)
4. The next Democratic president and the next Democratic Senate should expand the Supreme Court
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 11:21 PM
Jul 2017

Get it done the first month. Fuck what they think.

 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
7. That is why it is so important to take back Congress and block the fuck out of all of them
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 11:27 PM
Jul 2017

Effectively we can get a liberal majority if we give the Repugs the same treatment and respect they showed us.

Freethinker65

(10,001 posts)
12. Or he could only have Gorsuch, or he "could" get two, or he "could" get three, or four, or five...
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 11:29 PM
Jul 2017

And Lindsey "could" turn into a GOP senator that puts country above party....not terribly likely, but it "could" happen. Do y'all understand how surprising THAT would be?

lastlib

(23,167 posts)
14. It's the last year of dRumpf's term, so we should hold off confirming his choices....
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 11:38 PM
Jul 2017

...until after the next election! Right, Mitch?

Ezior

(505 posts)
18. Also, the Trump 2020 campaign has already started
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 04:16 AM
Jul 2017

He spoke at rallyes and he asks for donations.

According to the Mitch Rule, this means that SCOTUS nominees cannot be confirmed until there's a new POTUS.

Funtatlaguy

(10,863 posts)
19. I don't feel any better if Pence names them....
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 07:05 AM
Jul 2017

....that might even be worse....from a social policy perspective. Argh.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lindsey Graham: Trump cou...