Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sunonmars

(8,656 posts)
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:53 PM Jul 2017

"Investigators can use the president's interview to establish facts and intent"

and again puts his big fat mouth in it......

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/20/trumps-public-russia-comments-could-cause-legal-problems-240775

President Donald Trump’s decision to talk off the cuff about the Russia probe to reporters allowed him to put out his version of events — but increased the legal risks to him, as well as to his children and the growing number of associates who have been pulled into the expanding investigation.

Every public statement by the president or others involved opens a line of questioning for special counsel Robert Mueller or lawmakers exploring the contacts between Trump associates and Russia during the 2016 election.


Like the president’s tweets, his interviews can be used to establish facts or intent, offering investigators a gold mine of information but potentially creating conflicts for others that can lead to headaches for their various lawyers — or to criminal charges including perjury or obstruction of justice.

“The more attention that is given to this it harms everybody,” said Robert Bennett, a Washington lawyer who represented President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal and is a longtime law partner of Ty Cobb, who the White House announced on Sunday will join the administration to handle media and legal strategy.

Bennett called the president’s remarks Wednesday to The New York Times a “real mistake” and “totally counterproductive,” especially the apparent warnings directed at Mueller to limit the scope of his work.

The New York Times interview published Wednesday night was Trump being Trump, an unvarnished expression of his disdain over Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recusal from the Russia investigation, questioning Mueller’s impartiality and shifting to a “I don’t remember” defense instead of an outright denial regarding the details of a momentous February Oval Office conversation with then-FBI Director James Comey that has put the president himself in the cross hairs for a potential obstruction of justice charge.

..............

Everytime he opens his fat gobby mouth he drops himself in further legal jeopardy.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Investigators can use the president's interview to establish facts and intent" (Original Post) sunonmars Jul 2017 OP
Good. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #1
K&R! Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2017 #2
that stupid, entitled rich asshole has always been given the benefit of the doubt Skittles Jul 2017 #3
His intent was to get Sessions to resign ginnyinWI Jul 2017 #4
The idiot offers up his own guilt every time his maw moves. lindysalsagal Jul 2017 #5
K&R... spanone Jul 2017 #6

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
2. K&R!
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:00 PM
Jul 2017

Seems like Drumpf thinks he's a really smart guy who can talk his way out of this mess. Meanwhile, the only people besides him, who don't see how idiotic his constant tweeting and blabbing is are members of the brainwashed RW cult who all but worship him.

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)
4. His intent was to get Sessions to resign
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:08 PM
Jul 2017

But as usual, given an audience, he couldn't stop his big fat mouth.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Investigators can use th...