General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKushner will not be under oath in front of Intelligence Committee
Senior aide and son-in-law to President Donald Trump, Jared Kushner will not be asked to take the oath while testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Monday.
Kushner will speak behind closed doors to the committee but he wont be required to swear an oath, according to The Washington Post.
That arrangement still poses [a] significant legal risk to someone under investigation, The Post explained.
Though, if Kushner were to purger himself under oath, his father-in-law has done research in recent days to better understand the process for presidential pardons.
No one who has paid any attention to this administration should doubt that if Kushner ever needs a pardon, he will get one, said former federal prosecutor Justin Dillon.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/jared-kushner-will-not-be-required-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth-while-testifying/
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)flotsam
(3,268 posts)...the acceptance of a pardon is considered an admission of guilt and only applies to federal charges-he could still be charged at the state level. Further if pardoned for a federal felony I don't know how that might effect his security clearance or if he could continue to work in the White House.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Kaleva
(36,291 posts)Under oath or not.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Kaleva
(36,291 posts)Lying to Congress while under oath could get the witness a perjruy charge. Lying to Congress while not under oath could get the witness a making false statements charge. Perjury is more serious but much harder to prove.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)But I think there has to be some subtle readon they are not requiring an oath.
Lebam in LA
(1,344 posts)Kaleva
(36,291 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)and I'm sure his lawyers have advised him of trouble waters.
Demtexan
(1,588 posts)Just compare it to what the Feds have.
I am the democrats will ask some tough questions.
Hopefully.
RKP5637
(67,102 posts)out lies he will be caught. It's almost a morality test and a cross-validation of what they might already know.
Demtexan
(1,588 posts)I am pissed off about this but we can set a giant rat trap.
You know the feds have recordings.