Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,696 posts)
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 09:13 PM Jul 2017

Kushner will not be under oath in front of Intelligence Committee

Senior aide and son-in-law to President Donald Trump, Jared Kushner will not be asked to take the oath while testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Monday.

Kushner will speak behind closed doors to the committee but he won’t be required to swear an oath, according to The Washington Post.

“That arrangement still poses [a] significant legal risk to someone under investigation,” The Post explained.

Though, if Kushner were to purger himself under oath, his father-in-law has done research in recent days to better understand the process for presidential pardons.

“No one who has paid any attention to this administration should doubt that if Kushner ever needs a pardon, he will get one,’’ said former federal prosecutor Justin Dillon.


http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/jared-kushner-will-not-be-required-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth-while-testifying/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kushner will not be under oath in front of Intelligence Committee (Original Post) RandySF Jul 2017 OP
Then what's the FUCKING POINT? Chasstev365 Jul 2017 #1
As has been pointed out elsewhere... flotsam Jul 2017 #2
He can say anything he wants and not worry about contempt of Congress. liberal N proud Jul 2017 #3
No he can't. Lying to Congress is a serious crime. Kaleva Jul 2017 #7
They why do they put anyone under oath? NT Adrahil Jul 2017 #12
I really don't know the answer to that. Kaleva Jul 2017 #13
Yeah, it's odd.... Adrahil Jul 2017 #14
Isn't it still crime to lie to congress? Lebam in LA Jul 2017 #4
Yes. Can go to prison for that. Kaleva Jul 2017 #6
What he says will be held against him by SC Mueller jaysunb Jul 2017 #5
Any lie they say will be on recorded. Demtexan Jul 2017 #9
Good point. They probably have more on this guy than he remotely knows. If he strings RKP5637 Jul 2017 #10
Just give them more rope to hang themselves. Demtexan Jul 2017 #11
LOL "purger." WhiskeyGrinder Jul 2017 #8

flotsam

(3,268 posts)
2. As has been pointed out elsewhere...
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 09:24 PM
Jul 2017

...the acceptance of a pardon is considered an admission of guilt and only applies to federal charges-he could still be charged at the state level. Further if pardoned for a federal felony I don't know how that might effect his security clearance or if he could continue to work in the White House.

Kaleva

(36,291 posts)
13. I really don't know the answer to that.
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 11:42 PM
Jul 2017

Lying to Congress while under oath could get the witness a perjruy charge. Lying to Congress while not under oath could get the witness a making false statements charge. Perjury is more serious but much harder to prove.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
14. Yeah, it's odd....
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 11:48 PM
Jul 2017

But I think there has to be some subtle readon they are not requiring an oath.

jaysunb

(11,856 posts)
5. What he says will be held against him by SC Mueller
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 09:41 PM
Jul 2017

and I'm sure his lawyers have advised him of trouble waters.

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)
9. Any lie they say will be on recorded.
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 10:05 PM
Jul 2017

Just compare it to what the Feds have.

I am the democrats will ask some tough questions.

Hopefully.

RKP5637

(67,102 posts)
10. Good point. They probably have more on this guy than he remotely knows. If he strings
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 10:12 PM
Jul 2017

out lies he will be caught. It's almost a morality test and a cross-validation of what they might already know.

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)
11. Just give them more rope to hang themselves.
Sun Jul 23, 2017, 10:22 PM
Jul 2017

I am pissed off about this but we can set a giant rat trap.

You know the feds have recordings.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kushner will not be under...