General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShouldn't Wray have to recuse himself from anything Russia?
Everything reported has him scrubbing his online bio clean of anything Russian.
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/fbi-nominee-christopher-wray-sure-looks-dirty
Wray has at least an indirect connection to Rosneft, one of Russias state-controlled oil companies, whose murky relationship to Trump interests remained to be exposed to public view. Rosneft is a King & Spalding client (although the law firm deleted the page from its website). And Rosneft has a pending multi-billion-dollar oil deal with Exxon, whose former CEO Rex Tillerson is now Trumps secretary of state. So heres a pending deal from which Trump, Tillerson, Wray, and others stand to benefit directly. The Russian-Trump electoral collusion trail may well be littered with Russian oil money.
Wray has the same indirect connection to Gazprom, another Russian state-owned oil company and client of King & Spalding (page deleted from website). Gazprom was part of the case Wray handled for the American executive caught in a Russian investigation (that Wray later deleted from his bio). Gazproms relationship to Wray and Trump is murkier than Rosnefts, but includes connections to Carter Page, Paul Manafort, Richard Burt, a Gazprom-owned pipeline bypassing Ukraine, and possible lifting of sanctions on Russia.
---------
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/06/08/trump-new-fbi-director-chris-wray-russian-ties-rosneft-gazprom-column/102603214/
The most troubling issue that Wray may face is the fact that his law firm King & Spalding represents Rosneft and Gazprom, two of Russias largest state-controlled oil companies.
Rosneft was prominently mentioned in the now infamous 35-page dossier prepared by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele. The dossier claims that the CEO of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, offered candidate Donald Trump, through Trumps campaign advisor Carter Page, a 19% stake in the company in exchange for lifting U.S. sanctions on Russia. The dossier claims that the offer was made in July while Page was in Moscow.
(Snip)
If Wray was confirmed as the FBI director, and then had to recuse himself with regard to some or all of the Russia-related aspects of the critical investigation being conducted by the FBI and special counsel Robert Mueller, the potential damage to the investigation could be significant. If Wray refused to recuse himself from the Russia-Trump investigation or at least acknowledge the potential conflict issue, a serious cloud could be cast over the FBIs level of commitment to the investigation.
---------------
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/20/politics/kfile-fbi-nominee-law-firm-bio/index.html
(CNN)Donald Trump's nominee to be the director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, represented an American energy executive in 2006 who was being criminally investigated by the Russian government.
The detail, which was included on Wray's biography on the website of the law firm King and Spalding dating back to 2009, was removed in 2017, according to a KFile review of the Web Archive.
emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)rainbow4321
(9,974 posts)WTF? Like really...WTF. How is THIS not an issue?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-company-names-ethics-advisers-but-critics-say-its-an-impossible-spot/2017/01/25/4d90c1dc-e31c-11e6-a453-19ec4b3d09ba_story.html?utm_term=.421ca7f92dab
President Trumps private company on Wednesday tapped a longtime Republican lawyer and a company insider to serve in two corporate oversight positions, filling key roles Trump said would ensure his business minimizes conflicts of interest during his presidency.
The Trump Organization named Bobby Burchfield, a veteran GOP lawyer who has advised both Bush presidential teams, to serve as an outside ethics adviser. George A. Sorial, a 10-year Trump company executive, will serve the internal role of chief compliance counsel.
Burchfield, a partner in the Washington office of law-firm giant King & Spalding, will have the authority to approve or push back against any of the Trump companys new domestic deals. Certain transactions cannot be undertaken without his approval, the company said.
--------
And:
Link to tweet