General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, the Girl Scouts is up for grabs, then?
GOOD. I have just a slew of ideas of who we could get to speak with them.
These are the first three women I thought of off the top of my head:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/t-magazine/michelle-obama-chimamanda-ngozi-adichie-gloria-steinem-letter.html
?itok=voDFSL3H
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260079/hillary-clintons-tough-foreign-policy-scam-daniel-greenfield
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/42713896440815801
rzemanfl
(29,540 posts)Trumpist Dumbfuckistan.
Sugar Smack
(18,748 posts)and figured that trump's USE of impressionable young boys indicates his view of them as voting/fighting "equipment". It objectifies them. Women & girls have always been objectified. Always. And trump's one of the worst perpetrators of them all. "Up for grabs" was indicative of the "Girl Scouts" as an institution, not per individual. And Trumpist Dumbfuckistan is exactly where we've landed.
rzemanfl
(29,540 posts)were thinking.
I hope Twitler keeps his tiny hands off Girl Scouts.
Sugar Smack
(18,748 posts)Thank you!
rzemanfl
(29,540 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Actually, I'm pretty sure that is what they think.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Conservative critics claim the organization is turning children into lesbian socialist activists.
By Brian Tashman / Right Wing Watch March 5, 2015, 1:51 PM GMT
http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/beware-lesbian-abortion-cookies-3-outrageous-right-wing-attacks-girl-scouts
Sugar Smack
(18,748 posts)Among other things, they're becoming leaders in commerce at a very early age.
But after reading that article, I know a little better what we're all dealing with. OMG.