Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
Tue Jul 25, 2017, 05:43 PM Jul 2017

What gave the capital police the right?

I don't get how they can force someone to delete pictures on their cellphone or tell people they can't take photos in a place where the public gathers?

It seems to me it's a violation of the constitution in regards to free press, freedom of speech and all that.

Can anyone explain?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What gave the capital police the right? (Original Post) cynatnite Jul 2017 OP
Let's hope the ACLU gets on it because I can't think of a single reason The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2017 #1
There have been security restrictions on photography in governmental buildings forever. Girard442 Jul 2017 #2
Most art museums prohibit photography left-of-center2012 Jul 2017 #3
I am confused, what happened with the USCP bottomofthehill Jul 2017 #4
Found the thread, now I get it bottomofthehill Jul 2017 #5

Girard442

(6,066 posts)
2. There have been security restrictions on photography in governmental buildings forever.
Tue Jul 25, 2017, 05:51 PM
Jul 2017

Not sure at what point a space becomes so public that all photography gets 1A protection.

On edit: not saying that this is morally right, but it definitely is what is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What gave the capital pol...