General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFeinstein statement on Benczkowski nomination to lead DOJ's Criminal Division- Wow!
WashingtonSenate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today spoke at a hearing to consider the nomination of Brian Benczkowski to lead the Justice Departments Criminal Division:
Today were also considering Mr. Brian Benczkowski. I want to welcome him back to the committee. He previously served as staff director for Senator Sessions when he was ranking member. So, many of us do remember him.
Mr. Benczkowski has been nominated by President Trump to head the Criminal Division at Justice. The Criminal Division, as I think most people know, is responsible for enforcement of all federal criminal law in our country. Its an important position for the rule of law in this country.
We must assess today whether Mr. Benczkowski is qualified to lead this division. And that includes the propriety of his representation this year of Alfa Bank. This is the Russian bank that the media reported had been federally investigated for potential connections between its servers and the Trump Organization.
I dont know what investigations there were, if any, so we have requested a briefing. And I want to thank the chairman for helping to facilitate that briefing with the Justice Department.
I very much appreciate that Mr. Benczkowski has agreed to speak publicly about his work for Alfa Bank and I think its an important topic to understand given the position hes been nominated for.
As I understand it, Mr. Benczkowski participated in President Trumps transition team from September of last year to January of this year. He led the transition teams work at the Justice Department, which is now led by his former boss, Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
Mr. Benczkowski told the committee that the retention of former FBI Director James Comey was discussed by those on the transition team, including himself.
In March, within two months of leaving the transition team, Mr. Benczkowski agreed to represent Alfa Bank.
Specifically, his work for Alfa Bank went to the heart of the reported investigations. He worked with a computer forensics firm to determine any ties between servers of Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization, and also whether and how private server information had gotten out of the ban.
Additionally, he reviewed the Steele dossier, a private investigators file on alleged links between Russia and the Trump campaign. He did this for Alfa Bank to consider suing Buzz Feed for defamation over their online publication of the dossier. Alfa Bank, in fact, did sue Buzz Feed on May 26 of this year.
In April, while Mr. Benczkowski was working for Alfa Bank, Attorney General Sessionss chief of staff asked him about his interest in leading the Criminal Division.
Mr. Benczkowskis law firm then notified Alfa Bank of his potential nomination for the Trump administration. But the fact that Mr. Benczkowski continued representing Alfa Bank, until the day of his nomination, which was June 6, raises questions. After he found out about his potential nomination, why did he continue his representation of Alfa Bank?
It is clear to me that Mr. Benczkowski is knowledgeable about issues related to an ongoing investigation. So I asked before this hearing if he would commit himself to recusingnot only from cases involving Alfa Bank as his former client, but also matters within Special Counsel Muellers investigation.
He would not commit to recusing himself. Im concerned with his refusal, especially given the position for which he has been nominated. So I look forward to hearing from the witness on this point. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?id=71649645-8A75-4C9A-8C45-8CEA26A4D4B7
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)According to CNN, Alfa Bank's server "repeatedly looked up the contact information for a computer server being used by the Trump Organization [during the election] far more than other companies did, representing 80% of all lookups to the Trump server."
The FBI investigated why the server appeared to have a disproportionate interest in reaching a server used by the Trump Organization, in a way that was akin to looking up someone's phone number thousands of times.
Investigators have so far found no evidence that Russian officials communicated with the Trump campaign via those servers, according to The New York Times. But independent cybersecurity experts have still been unable to give the company a clean bill of health, the Times said.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-doj-nominee-helped-russian-bank-2017-7
riversedge
(70,186 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Is it no longer reasonable to ask that our top leaders NOT be in bed with the goddamn Russians? Is that so much to ask???
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)find out what evidence they had) and now Trump and Sessions want him at DOJ to throw a wrench into Mueller's investigation.
Ligyron
(7,627 posts)Good job!
DK504
(3,847 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Now let's put him over the investigation just to be sure!
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Augiedog
(2,545 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)gracing the Senate with their presence. What exactly has this guy done that Sen. Feinstein that she is thankful for? Is she thankful he showed up so he could discuss his lying, cheating, conniving illegal activities along with subverting America's democracy?
I'm not to GD grateful someone like this is nominated to a position to destroy evidence and break as many laws as he and his cronies desire. This guy is as unqualified as Sessions to be in any role in government.
58Sunliner
(4,381 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)K & R
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)to this guy and all others: No recusals.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)His firm represented Russians connected to the govt, and now he's in charge of the FBI's Russian investigation.
The Senators asked him what he'd say to those who got a call from Russians with dirt on opponent. I heard Senators restate his answer to say that he would tell them to call the FBI. But that is not what he said. You have to listen closely to these shifty people. He said, after being asked several times by Lindsay Graham and pushed on it, he finally said reluctantly that "that is something that the FBI would want to know about." Sounds similar, but it's not the same thing.
I can't believe they confirmed that guy. He must have a lot of friends in the Senate. He certainly is a friend of Trump's....and his firm represented big Russian clients connected to the Russian govt. Duh.
I would never have confirmed that man. Can't we get someone in these positions w/o connections to the Russians and a bff to Trump?