General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump using Twitter to announce huge policy changes or attack people is authoritarianism.
I find it disturbing that we just found out about this large policy change in the military (banning transgender individuals) via a tweet with a "Thank You" at the end.
By using Twitter, all "announcements" come solely from him--there is no legislative context--matters and policies are simply stated by him alone and then "end of story."
And, if the media reports and corrects his tweets, those who initially read them and who are loyal to trump, tend to believe him because they read it straight from the office of the president.
This is an abuse of power and another sign that our democracy is in danger.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)I bet Democratic presidents will be using it too.
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)I don't think "tweets" are the preferred mode of communication when it comes to matters that need context and refined explanation.
Maybe it is the wave of the future, but something in me is resisting it.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)by authoritarian figures/regimes.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)The media need to call Dolt45 on his BS
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)the country. Those cheering him on will be shocked when he turns on them too as he exercises authoritarian rule and the meek congress allows him to carry on.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)I can see whats coming. Needs to be stopped now or we're screwed.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Hugin
(33,120 posts)May we now dispense with Godwin's Law? Please?
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)Authoritarian.
(and just stupid)
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)....you get the idea.
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)By using Twitter, all "announcements" come solely from him--there is no legislative context--matters and policies are simply stated by him alone and then "end of story."
If he announces that a policy has changed, and the medium happens to be twitter, then it wasn't "the tweet" that changed the policy. He was just reporting something or some decision that ALREADY had just happened. Whether or not he tweets something doesn't change that fact that a policy has changed. It's not like Trump tweets something an then it become policy by virtue of his decree/tweet. In this most recent example, Trump states there was Consultation with his generals and military experts, so presumably, THAT it where the decision or policy change happened... not when the tweet was made.
Hypothetical example disproving the OP theory: If trump woke up tomorrow and declared we were going to war with Canada via his twitter account, it would not actually happen. Because trump's tweets are not authoritarian decrees. He would still have to go to congress and ask for a declaration of war regardless of his tweet.
Twitter is nothing more than a media outlet and trump is not a dictator (yet) despite any of his aspirations.
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)I am simply talking about his manner of announcing it via Twitter and the psychological impact of "proclamation."
I think it is partly a "shock and awe" sort of strategy.
For instance this morning, it appears that the Pentagon is blindsided as is General Mattis. He apparently did not work out this major policy change through the proper channels. The Pentagon learned of this shift in policy via his Twitter account. There is something very wrong with that.
I think announcements via Twitter are very different from a press conference or an in person announcement at an official podium that is broadcast live.
I hope that clarifies my original post.