General Discussion

spanone

(135,828 posts) Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:11 PM Jul 2017

'the president did not approve of scaramucci's language'...reported on cnn

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'the president did not approve of scaramucci's language'...reported on cnn (Original Post) spanone Jul 2017 OP

LIAR Iliyah Jul 2017 #1

He didn't approve of it getting out of the locker room. VermontKevin Jul 2017 #2

lol.. yeah.. JHan Jul 2017 #3

He Didn't Talk about Sucking Cocks Leith Jul 2017 #10

Right. It wasn't him, or what he did, it was his vocabulary. lindysalsagal Jul 2017 #4

Was it too sophisticated for trump*'s taste? Siwsan Jul 2017 #5

Bullshit Freethinker65 Jul 2017 #6

He LOVED it until Gen. Kelly read him the riot act. nt tblue37 Jul 2017 #7

Because we know what a prude he is rock Jul 2017 #8

Someone actually had the intestinal fortitude to report that. onecaliberal Jul 2017 #9

I think we were supposed to be shocked, SHOCKED!, at his language and demand his firing. Iggo Jul 2017 #11

What a joke malaise Jul 2017 #12

the vulgarian-in-chief.... spanone Jul 2017 #13

Not funny malaise Jul 2017 #14

I'll wager on Access Hollywood tape that this is a LIE. NT Bleacher Creature Jul 2017 #15

Talk about 'pussies,' okay. Talk about 'cocks,' not okay leftstreet Jul 2017 #16

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

1. LIAR

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:13 PM

Jul 2017

LIAR, LIAR, LIAR

VermontKevin

(1,473 posts)

2. He didn't approve of it getting out of the locker room.

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:13 PM

Jul 2017

Otherwise, he was fine wid' it.

JHan

(10,173 posts)

3. lol.. yeah..

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:14 PM

Jul 2017

Leith

(7,809 posts)

10. He Didn't Talk about Sucking Cocks

Reply to JHan (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:56 PM

Jul 2017

That must be where he draws the line.

lindysalsagal

(20,679 posts)

4. Right. It wasn't him, or what he did, it was his vocabulary.

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:15 PM

Jul 2017

Siwsan

(26,260 posts)

5. Was it too sophisticated for trump*'s taste?

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:17 PM

Jul 2017

Freethinker65

(10,015 posts)

6. Bullshit

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:24 PM

Jul 2017

tblue37

(65,336 posts)

7. He LOVED it until Gen. Kelly read him the riot act. nt

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:29 PM

Jul 2017

rock

(13,218 posts)

8. Because we know what a prude he is

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:36 PM

Jul 2017

Oops! I meant ASSHOLE, and he didn't want to be outdone!

onecaliberal

(32,839 posts)

9. Someone actually had the intestinal fortitude to report that.

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:49 PM

Jul 2017

Iggo

(47,552 posts)

11. I think we were supposed to be shocked, SHOCKED!, at his language and demand his firing.

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 06:58 PM

Jul 2017

Never happened, but it appears that's the only narrative they have.

Dipshits.

malaise

(268,956 posts)

12. What a joke

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:06 PM

Jul 2017

The short-fingered vulgarian is upset at vulgarity

spanone

(135,828 posts)

13. the vulgarian-in-chief....

Reply to malaise (Reply #12)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:07 PM

Jul 2017

it's insulting...but, i guess they gotta try

malaise

(268,956 posts)

14. Not funny

Reply to spanone (Reply #13)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:09 PM

Jul 2017

Follow the money - bet that doesn't offend him - oh wait!

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)

15. I'll wager on Access Hollywood tape that this is a LIE. NT

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:11 PM

Jul 2017

leftstreet

(36,106 posts)

16. Talk about 'pussies,' okay. Talk about 'cocks,' not okay

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:11 PM

Jul 2017

No double standard there

Reply to this discussion