Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 09:50 PM Sep 2017

Boom! on a Sunday night.

Don McGahn scolded Ty Cobb for discussing Russia investigation at DC steakhouse, where @nytimes overheard it.

Trump Lawyers Clash Over How Much to Cooperate With Russia Inquiry

WASHINGTON — President Trump’s legal team is wrestling with how much to cooperate with the special counsel looking into Russian election interference, an internal debate that led to an angry confrontation last week between two White House lawyers and that could shape the course of the investigation.

At the heart of the clash is an issue that has challenged multiple presidents during high-stakes Washington investigations: how to handle the demands of investigators without surrendering the institutional prerogatives of the office of the presidency. Similar conflicts during the Watergate and Monica S. Lewinsky scandals resulted in court rulings that limited a president’s right to confidentiality.

The debate in Mr. Trump’s West Wing has pitted Donald F. McGahn II, the White House counsel, against Ty Cobb, a lawyer brought in to manage the response to the investigation. Mr. Cobb has argued for turning over as many of the emails and documents requested by the special counsel as possible in hopes of quickly ending the investigation — or at least its focus on Mr. Trump.

Mr. McGahn supports cooperation, but is worried about setting a precedent that would weaken the White House long after Mr. Trump’s tenure is over. He is described as particularly concerned about whether the president will invoke executive or attorney-client privilege to limit how forthcoming Mr. McGahn could be if he himself is interviewed by the special counsel as requested.

More: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/us/politics/trump-lawyers-white-house-russia-mcgahn-ty-cobb.html


Also,


Memo to the White House staff: the New York Times is reporting that the guy next to you may be afraid you're wearing a wire for Mueller.

Maybe you should be.

Before he does.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boom! on a Sunday night. (Original Post) MelissaB Sep 2017 OP
"McGhan had a couple of documents locked in a safe" TubbersUK Sep 2017 #1
Fascinating! n/t BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2017 #2
Don't they know better than to discuss this in a public setting? DesertRat Sep 2017 #3

TubbersUK

(1,439 posts)
1. "McGhan had a couple of documents locked in a safe"
Sun Sep 17, 2017, 10:21 PM
Sep 2017

that Cobb wanted access to.

🤔

Edit:

And who's actually going to believe that McGahn wants to collaborate but "is worried about setting a precedent" that would weaken the WH after the Trump tenure?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boom! on a Sunday night.