Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:17 PM Sep 2017

National Geographic: See the Wild Places That May Lose Protections as National Monuments

https://apple.news/AS_O8nGi_RY2d9cYli3e2BA

Four protected areas could shrink and six others could be opened to mining, logging, and fishing, based on new recommendations to President Trump

Four national monuments in the American West could be shrunk and six others opened up to permit more mining, grazing, logging, and commercial fishing if President Trump follows the recommendations of Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke.

The monuments recommended for downsizing include red rock canyons in Utah, forest and grassland in Oregon, and stunning rock formations in Nevada.
If enacted, the modifications would represent the most sweeping changes to existing national monuments by any sitting president — and are sure to set off a legal battle over presidential powers likely to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

Zinke’s advice is contained in a 19-page memorandum sent to the president late last month, after a review of 27 monuments at least 100,000 acres or more in size. Both the White House and Zinke had declined to make the memorandum public. The Washington Post published a leaked copy online Sunday night.

DETAILS:
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Geographic: See the Wild Places That May Lose Protections as National Monuments (Original Post) G_j Sep 2017 OP
The ink won't be dry before the greedy opportunists move in. lpbk2713 Sep 2017 #1
I would imagine that Rupert Murdoch's National Geographic would be all for losing wild places Glorfindel Sep 2017 #2

lpbk2713

(42,753 posts)
1. The ink won't be dry before the greedy opportunists move in.
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:23 PM
Sep 2017


I expect to hear from Robert Redford about this.

Glorfindel

(9,726 posts)
2. I would imagine that Rupert Murdoch's National Geographic would be all for losing wild places
Mon Sep 18, 2017, 07:31 PM
Sep 2017

As far as I'm concerned, National Geographic is right down in the sewer with Fox "News" and the New York Post.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»National Geographic: See ...