Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupremes predicting badly
********QUOTE*******
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2017/09/supreme_court_justices_try_to_predict_the_future.html
Black Robes and Crystal Balls
Supreme Court justices like to predict the future. They arent very good at it.
Supreme Court justices like to predict the future. They arent very good at it.
By Mark Joseph Stern
Prediction: Allowing Guantánamo detainees to challenge their detention will get Americans killed.
Predictor: Justice Antonin Scalia
Right or wrong: Wrong
Prediction: Permitting states to opt out of Medicaid expansion wont have much effect on the Affordable Care Act.
Predictor: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Right or wrong: Wrong.
Prediction: Requiring forensic analysts to testify at criminal trials will let innumerable guilty people off the hook.
Predictor: Justice Anthony Kennedy
Right or wrong: Wrong
Prediction: Striking down a federal ban on same-sex marriage will not lead to nationwide marriage equality.
Predictor: Chief Justice John Roberts
Right or wrong: Hilariously wrong
Prediction: Affirmative action wont be necessary by 2028.
Predictor: Justice Sandra Day OConnor
Right or wrong: Too soon to tell (but probably wrong)
********UNQUOTE********
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1459 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supremes predicting badly (Original Post)
UTUSN
Sep 2017
OP
prediction: citizen's united will not open the floodgates to foreign money in our elections
unblock
Sep 2017
#1
Prediction: Nullifying Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act won't affect voting patterns
gratuitous
Sep 2017
#3
unblock
(52,196 posts)1. prediction: citizen's united will not open the floodgates to foreign money in our elections
predictor: samuel alito
right of wrong: oy vey!
actual quote: obama: " (citizen's united decision) will open the floodgates for special interests including foreign corporations to spend without limit in our election"
alito: " (inaudibly) not true"
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)2. Excellent point.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)3. Prediction: Nullifying Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act won't affect voting patterns
Predictor: Chief Justice Roberts
Right or Wrong: Dead wrong, but he knew it all along.
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)4. What a gratuitously excellent post!1