Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 06:16 PM Sep 2017

I wasnt an Obama or Bill Clinton supporter, I was a democratic party supporter

and they rose to the top of my party and as a result I supported them.

The more I learned about both, Barack especially, the more I liked them and supported them, but they were Democrats first.

We have a simple process in many ways here in America. The most simple part of all is you get two choices, you ONLY get two, you have always only gotten two and for the foreseeable future you will only get two. Two.

So for me it is simple, I never support republicans, I always support Democrats. The individual is far less important than the party.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wasnt an Obama or Bill Clinton supporter, I was a democratic party supporter (Original Post) Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 OP
You get more than 2 choices however only one of 2 will you likely receive. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #1
Thomas Jefferson wanted a two party system for a very good reason world wide wally Sep 2017 #2
well he and his buddies designed a system that deliberately rigged the presidential elections to not Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #3
Yip, one wingnut slur was to call us "idolators"/Kool-Aid of (fill in blank/individuals) UTUSN Sep 2017 #4

world wide wally

(21,740 posts)
2. Thomas Jefferson wanted a two party system for a very good reason
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 06:46 PM
Sep 2017

His reasoning was that with more than two parties, it would be very unlikely that any of our Presidents would be elected with a true majority of the people.

Voltaire2

(12,996 posts)
3. well he and his buddies designed a system that deliberately rigged the presidential elections to not
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 06:58 PM
Sep 2017

be a majority vote system, and put together an upper chamber of congress that also took a giant poop on representative democracy. It was not entirely his fault, other emerging republics of the period also were implemented by wealthy elites who absolutely did not want the great unwashed masses to have a say in how things were run. Plus slaves. We implemented a Republic that legalized slavery.

It would not be until the mid 20th century that we decided that actually "one person one vote" was sort of the point, managed to enfranchise all people instead of only some, and even then only halfheartedly as we continued to maintain both the electoral college and the vastly unrepresentative senate (although a bit earlier we at least started electing senators instead of appointing them.)

We are at the moment staring at the emergence of a one party system, which is sort of the inevitable outgrowth of a corrupt two party system. It is not implausible that in the relatively near future voting here will be about as meaningful as it was in the Soviet Union.

UTUSN

(70,674 posts)
4. Yip, one wingnut slur was to call us "idolators"/Kool-Aid of (fill in blank/individuals)
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 08:47 PM
Sep 2017

My e-mail sparring wingnut used to call me (all of us Dems) "worshippers" of OBAMA/Hillary/whomever.

I shut him down (after repeating this: ) I am a partisan of the DemocratIC Party's AGENDA, which for me consists of::

1- Civil Rights
2- Social Justice
3- Stewardship of the planet
4- Civil liberties

and that the leader-of-the-moment is the instrument of the AGENDA, not my "idol". That said, however, once they've passed into history I just might be an idolater (think, FDR, Eleanor, HST, LBJ).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I wasnt an Obama or Bill ...