Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 971 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brookings: 21 mil will lose coverage by 2026, 32 mil after 2027 (Original Post)
Tanuki
Sep 2017
OP
So what? The rich are demanding their tax cuts. And the GOP is doing all they can to deliver.
Eyeball_Kid
Sep 2017
#1
Eyeball_Kid
(7,429 posts)1. So what? The rich are demanding their tax cuts. And the GOP is doing all they can to deliver.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)5. So millions of people will lose their health care plans.
Their families will be sicker and they'll die sooner. Not everything is about "the rich."
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. GOPers will tout that as a big reduction in uninsured compared to previous repeal bills.
And death wii reduce number of uninsured.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)4. The reality would be worse than any estimate
Once Republican governors and others in charge were allowed to allocate the funds
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)6. What expires in 2027?