Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 06:35 PM Oct 2017

Bernie Sanders pays National City campaign bill

Secret Service declines to spring for candidate's security costs
By Bruce Kauffman, Oct. 8, 2017

More than a year after Bernie Sanders led a high-spirited rally in a public park in National City during his run for the presidency, he's finally paid his bill of more than $28,000 in municipal services, the mayor said Friday (October 6).

The money had been put up by the city mainly for overtime pay for police, fire, and public works personnel. Sixteen city blocks were blockaded for the May 21, 2016, campaign appearance in Kimball Park, an expanse that presents a challenge to security as it is flanked by high-rise apartment buildings. The Sanders camp gave the city three days' notice to do its part to host the event.

On August 1, 2017, the city council voted to sue. It wanted $28,340 in out-of-pocket expenses and about $3000 more in penalties and interest, On October 4th, officials were notified the Sanders campaign would pay up — interest, penalties, and all.

“We'd sent them notice after notice,” mayor Ron Morrison said by phone from Albuquerque, where he has been taking a few days of relaxation. “The city no longer has to sue. We're done with it now. We were not, quote, 'making money,’ unquote, on this.”

Read more: https://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2017/oct/08/stringers-bernie-sanders-pays-national-city/#

About the San Diego Reader:

The San Diego Reader is the largest alternative press paper in the county of San Diego, distributed free in stands and private businesses throughout the county, funded by advertisements. Averaging 90,000 copies per issue, it reportedly has the largest circulation of any alternative weekly publication in the nation. It frequently presents an opposing viewpoint to the San Diego Union Tribune, the primary printed newspaper in the city.
...........................................
Noted for its literary style of journalism and coverage of the arts, particularly film and theater, the Reader is recognized as a pioneer among alternative weeklies for both its creative nonfiction and its commercial scheme, using ad revenue (particularly from classifieds and entertainment promotions) to establish the practice of widespread free circulation, a cornerstone of today's alternative papers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Diego_Reader

97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders pays National City campaign bill (Original Post) George II Oct 2017 OP
K & R Me. Oct 2017 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Purveyor Oct 2017 #2
You never saw the DU system duplicate a new OP? George II Oct 2017 #3
FYI, here are the definitions of "salacious".... George II Oct 2017 #4
In this case and considering the poster, either could apply when it comes to dirt on Purveyor Oct 2017 #6
What dirt? RandySF Oct 2017 #8
Once again, you're calling me salacious. So which definition applies... George II Oct 2017 #10
Ha!! :-D NurseJackie Oct 2017 #15
How come you never call me salacious snooper2 Oct 2017 #16
Bazinga! George II Oct 2017 #29
Hey, Sheldon resents that Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #56
Bwaaahhhhhaaaa!! ehrnst Oct 2017 #36
And here it is, used in a sentence. greatauntoftriplets Oct 2017 #31
Unlike Trump, we pay our bills. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #5
It has been a year...a great deal of money was raised...seriously bad optics here. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #21
I dont think a year is too long without additional info. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #23
They paid up after a lawsuit was filed...seriously bad optic...and if anyone else was involved most Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #24
It happens more often than people are aware. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #25
It is a year later...local towns should not have to wait that long. I don't care who does it...it is Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #35
What issues? (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #43
I doubt that there was uncertainty about this debt. Why should a municipality have to resort.... George II Oct 2017 #72
Well, I'll put it like this. moriah Oct 2017 #77
The difference is that the campaign wasn't waiting for contributions in order to clear debt.... George II Oct 2017 #79
K&R Gothmog Oct 2017 #7
K&R mcar Oct 2017 #9
That's good. I'm sure everyone is glad the campaign paid up. aikoaiko Oct 2017 #11
Finally. nt Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #12
I'm sure BS made good lapucelle Oct 2017 #13
$28K and $31K? Surely the expenses for suing in various states he lost Hortensis Oct 2017 #92
Why that dirty rotten no good socialist son of a gun. kacekwl Oct 2017 #14
Even socialists are expected to pay bills. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #22
On time, no less. ehrnst Oct 2017 #38
Hey, it happens. Our last runner up for the Presidential nomination needed 4+ years to pay her bills Tom Rinaldo Oct 2017 #17
That's not a fair comparison - Clinton had a deficit in her treasury in 2008..... George II Oct 2017 #18
And Bernie raised it without accepting corporate money or giving lucrative speeches to Wall Street. Bluepinky Oct 2017 #26
That is false. George II Oct 2017 #27
Whatever you say, sounds like you have your anti-Bernie info at the ready. Bluepinky Oct 2017 #28
More the other way. The fact is that your claim that Clinton financed her campaign.... George II Oct 2017 #32
You've had to share that link so many times on here. JHan Oct 2017 #33
Why are people still fanning the Hillary-Bernie flame war? Bluepinky Oct 2017 #34
Pointing out facts and discrediting fallacies is "fanning the flames?" ehrnst Oct 2017 #39
I never mentioned Clinton in the response, you did. Bluepinky Oct 2017 #86
Sure, you only said: George II Oct 2017 #87
You assumed it was Hillary. Bluepinky Oct 2017 #88
You use an attack line right out of the primary and R B Garr Oct 2017 #89
Oh it's you again, part of the anti-Bernie pack. No further response needed. Bluepinky Oct 2017 #90
How dishonest. The anti-Democrat brigade is what brought us Trump. R B Garr Oct 2017 #95
Because the question was illogical since I never never mentioned the Democratic primary. Who... George II Oct 2017 #93
Are you going to back up your accusation that ehrnst Oct 2017 #45
The lies told about Hillary are so pervasive and deeply embedded in our national Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #61
Post removed Post removed Oct 2017 #63
What scares the living shit out of me is they are gonna do it again Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #66
Burn it down if you can't get your way... ehrnst Oct 2017 #68
*Crickets* lunamagica Oct 2017 #76
And who did? ehrnst Oct 2017 #41
These kinds of filthy lies are why we have Trump. R B Garr Oct 2017 #78
Exactly. nt SunSeeker Oct 2017 #94
Of course melman Oct 2017 #40
For whom? (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #42
Ever hear of loans and interest? George II Oct 2017 #44
Right melman Oct 2017 #46
What other? (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #47
lol melman Oct 2017 #48
What other? ehrnst Oct 2017 #50
lol melman Oct 2017 #54
Of course. You can't win. ehrnst Oct 2017 #55
No melman Oct 2017 #57
Yes ehrnst Oct 2017 #62
Who mentioned a crime? George II Oct 2017 #49
Clearly. ehrnst Oct 2017 #51
Some helpful links melman Oct 2017 #52
You seem unclear on the topic ehrnst Oct 2017 #53
I'm very familiar with the English language, don't need any help. Back on ignore for you! George II Oct 2017 #58
Oh no! melman Oct 2017 #60
Certainly not by being fact checked! ehrnst Oct 2017 #65
That makes sense melman Oct 2017 #69
Yes it actually does. ehrnst Oct 2017 #70
I don't recall collection agencies being involved in 2008 lapucelle Oct 2017 #80
Excellent research, thanks. Some very interesting information, and numbers. George II Oct 2017 #81
Thank you. sheshe2 Oct 2017 #82
There is honor lapucelle Oct 2017 #83
This is the truth, lapucelle. sheshe2 Oct 2017 #84
### NurseJackie Oct 2017 #96
Hey that's not fair GaryCnf Oct 2017 #59
Really? Can you explain? Thanks. George II Oct 2017 #85
Yes GaryCnf Oct 2017 #91
K&R. lunamagica Oct 2017 #19
K&R Jamaal510 Oct 2017 #20
K&R sheshe2 Oct 2017 #30
kicked and recced. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #37
Haven't other campaigns in the past written off their debts? left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #64
After being threatened with a lawsuit! ehrnst Oct 2017 #67
Not debt to others. Federal Campaign Finance laws prohibit candidate committee.... George II Oct 2017 #71
He doesn't deserve applause for late payment of a substantial bill. And, no, it isn't legal pnwmom Oct 2017 #73
Not unusual Philistein Oct 2017 #74
Only in cases where the candidate's committee ended the campaign with a negative balance... George II Oct 2017 #75
THAT is a very important distinction, isn't it? NurseJackie Oct 2017 #97

Response to George II (Original post)

George II

(67,782 posts)
4. FYI, here are the definitions of "salacious"....
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 06:49 PM
Oct 2017
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/salacious

Definition of salacious

1 :arousing or appealing to sexual desire or imagination
2 :lecherous, lustful

Which one were you referring to?

George II

(67,782 posts)
10. Once again, you're calling me salacious. So which definition applies...
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 07:39 PM
Oct 2017

....

1 :arousing or appealing to sexual desire or imagination
2 :lecherous, lustful

PS - why did you delete your first post where you called me salacious?

 

Weekend Warrior

(1,301 posts)
5. Unlike Trump, we pay our bills.
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 07:05 PM
Oct 2017

As fast as Sanders rose it not surprising there are still outstanding payments out there. The growth of his campaign was so rapid that it became obvious where resources were being used and where they weren’t. Almost all resources were being used to keep the appearance of energy, youth, and numbers. They held many rallies with under five days notice. Everywhere he went, even on short notice, the stands were full. It became the cornerstone of his campaign, got him a lot of his news coverage, and gave his candidacy the image that it was worthy.

The resources needed were huge. Accounting was truly put on the back burner. A lot of oversite was put on the back burner. It was and still is the most impressive thing they did. I believe it took Weaver to do it. The Way they fed the energy of the beast was amazing. It also required them to overlook certain areas until a later date. I really don’t find it shocking this debt or others are outstanding. They also have a commitment to those who gave it to spend it with due care.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
21. It has been a year...a great deal of money was raised...seriously bad optics here.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:23 AM
Oct 2017

I can't think of a good enough excuse for this...maybe they forgot.

 

Weekend Warrior

(1,301 posts)
23. I dont think a year is too long without additional info.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 07:00 AM
Oct 2017

Specially when there are possible grounds for dispute. I doubt this was/is the only outstanding bill.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
24. They paid up after a lawsuit was filed...seriously bad optic...and if anyone else was involved most
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 07:13 AM
Oct 2017

here would agree.

 

Weekend Warrior

(1,301 posts)
25. It happens more often than people are aware.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 08:06 AM
Oct 2017

Lawsuits force people into quicker action. It's a tool many of us use for debt collection. Specially when there are issues surrounding the certainty of the debt.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
35. It is a year later...local towns should not have to wait that long. I don't care who does it...it is
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 03:56 PM
Oct 2017

wrong. And if someone else was involved most would agree. They knew they owed the money...but ignored the bills.

George II

(67,782 posts)
72. I doubt that there was uncertainty about this debt. Why should a municipality have to resort....
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:19 PM
Oct 2017

....to "debt collection" when the debtor has $5M in the bank?

moriah

(8,311 posts)
77. Well, I'll put it like this.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:47 PM
Oct 2017

In 2008, I had enough money to donate to some campaigns.

I volunteered for Hillary but didn't donate in the primary because I wanted to save it, and put that and more money into the General. Once it was over, I donated to help clear Hillary's campaign debt. It wasn't as high of a priority and so I did donate less than to the General, but I did keep up a monthly little bit until it was covered.

I can understand if Sanders supporters waited until after the general to donate to clear primary debt. And I can understand if they had prioritized the primary and general first, then took a little longer to help their candidate pay the bills from running.

Anyway, it's not yet been a full year since the General. And if I read it right, the Sanders campaign also paid the penalty the city requested as the late fee.

I was a Hill supporter, and I agree -- unlike Trump, we Democrats pay our debts. It took Hill a long time to get hers fully paid from 2008. But she did.

George II

(67,782 posts)
79. The difference is that the campaign wasn't waiting for contributions in order to clear debt....
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 08:00 PM
Oct 2017

...it had a surplus in the millions of dollars and even today has more than $5 million in it's treasury.

And it was more than a year after the debt was incurred. The date of the General Election is irrelevant, he wasn't a candidate in the General Election and suspended all campaigning (and incurring debt) around the time of the Democratic National Convention, July 2016.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
92. $28K and $31K? Surely the expenses for suing in various states he lost
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 08:49 AM
Oct 2017

would have exceeded these bills. Of course most of those lawsuits were dropped quickly after the media moved on, but still, mounting lawsuits to manipulate opinion has to be pretty expensive.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
17. Hey, it happens. Our last runner up for the Presidential nomination needed 4+ years to pay her bills
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 03:22 PM
Oct 2017

When you have a real shot at the presidency candidates tend to spend money they don't have rather than fall short for lack of resources. Then, the responsible ones, make an effort over time to make good on their debts. Here is what happened after the last Democratic Party contested nomination for President. And Hillary made good, like she was supposed to do. It just takes time


Hillary Clinton's campaign debt finally paid off
Posted by
CNN Political Research Director Robert Yoon

Washington (CNN) – More than four years after suspending her 2008 presidential bid, now-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has finally paid off her campaign debt.

Clinton's presidential organization spent the final day of 2012 paying down the remaining debt, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission late Tuesday...
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/22/hillary-clintons-campaign-debt-finally-paid-off/

George II

(67,782 posts)
18. That's not a fair comparison - Clinton had a deficit in her treasury in 2008.....
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 04:10 PM
Oct 2017

....Sanders on the other hand ended his campaign with more than $5M in his treasury.

Bluepinky

(2,268 posts)
28. Whatever you say, sounds like you have your anti-Bernie info at the ready.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:16 AM
Oct 2017

I will try not to take the bait again.
Our real concern now should be keeping nuclear weapons away from those with tiny hands and immature brains.
Let go of your Bernie hate, he's not the problem.

George II

(67,782 posts)
32. More the other way. The fact is that your claim that Clinton financed her campaign....
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 10:37 AM
Oct 2017

....by giving speeches to Wall Street is 110% false.

You can find details of the Federal Campaign Finance Laws here:

https://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/legislation/

Bluepinky

(2,268 posts)
34. Why are people still fanning the Hillary-Bernie flame war?
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 01:22 PM
Oct 2017

We have more important things to focus on, like a nuclear holocaust.
We should all be united to protect ourselves from this internal threat to our democracy. Bernie isn't the problem.

I, for one, love that people like Eminem are speaking out against Trump.

George II

(67,782 posts)
87. Sure, you only said:
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 12:32 AM
Oct 2017

"accepting corporate money or giving lucrative speeches to Wall Street".

Okay, I'll play your game, just who were you referring to there? Yogi Berra? Tom Brady? Vladimir Putin? Taylor Swift?


Bluepinky

(2,268 posts)
88. You assumed it was Hillary.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 12:54 AM
Oct 2017

You never answered my question, why haven't you and others moved on from the Democratic primary? What's the point of rehashing it over and over, don't you think there are more important issues right now?

Hillary and Bernie aren't the problem, let it go.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
89. You use an attack line right out of the primary and
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 03:01 AM
Oct 2017

then claim to be about letting things go? How weird is that.

edit: this thread is about current news of a threatened lawsuit.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
95. How dishonest. The anti-Democrat brigade is what brought us Trump.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 10:30 AM
Oct 2017

You bring up a dishonest, unproven smear against our candidate right out of the primaries and then attack me. No wonder you have no response.

George II

(67,782 posts)
93. Because the question was illogical since I never never mentioned the Democratic primary. Who...
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 08:50 AM
Oct 2017

..."rehashed it"?

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
45. Are you going to back up your accusation that
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 05:39 PM
Oct 2017

other candidates took corporate contributions, and financed their campaign with speaking fees?

Do you have the courage of your convictions?

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
61. The lies told about Hillary are so pervasive and deeply embedded in our national
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 05:55 PM
Oct 2017

psyche that most people dont even realize when they are repeating lies.

Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #61)

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
66. What scares the living shit out of me is they are gonna do it again
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:02 PM
Oct 2017

impure candidates are gonna not get the votes needed to keep the fascists out.

count on it

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
68. Burn it down if you can't get your way...
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:06 PM
Oct 2017

It takes privileged white straight men, and the women who love them, to not see the problem with that.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
78. These kinds of filthy lies are why we have Trump.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 07:21 PM
Oct 2017

Endless dishonest smears against our nominee should have no place here.

In the meantime, there's an actual, real, open fraud FBI investigation, and it's not about Hillary.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
40. Of course
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 05:33 PM
Oct 2017

That's totally different. Everybody knows 'hey I don't have the money' is a legit excuse for not paying bills. For four years.





 

melman

(7,681 posts)
46. Right
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 05:42 PM
Oct 2017

You'll obviously have a million reasons why one is the crime of the century and the other is totally okay.


George II

(67,782 posts)
49. Who mentioned a crime?
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 05:44 PM
Oct 2017

I guess you don't have much of an understanding of how campaign finances work or how they're governed by Federal and State law.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
70. Yes it actually does.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:10 PM
Oct 2017

At least... if you've been reading the thread.

Especially the part where someone makes false accusation that a candidate took corporate donations or speaking fees for a campaign, in violation of campaign finance law, then scurrying away when confronted on it.

Coming back to you now?

lapucelle

(18,238 posts)
80. I don't recall collection agencies being involved in 2008
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 08:48 PM
Oct 2017

or the threat of embarrassing lawsuits finally compelling payment with funds on hand that were more than sufficient to pay the money owed with $5,000,000 to spare.

Nor do I recall an argument being made that American taxpayers should pay campaign event bills through funds dispersed to the Secret Service.

Of course, the picture would be clearer if we had a full accounting of the finances, but alas, we don't. Even after returning certain questionable contributions (as per agreement with the FEC), the campaign ended $5,455,167.90 in the black. That was more than enough to pay the debt of $449,409.01.

https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/P60007168/?cycle=2016&election_full=True

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/08/18/20074/how-bernie-sanders-beat-clock-and-avoided-disclosure

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/San-Diego-Demands-Payment-from-Sanders-Campaign--396957901.html

lapucelle

(18,238 posts)
83. There is honor
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:21 PM
Oct 2017

in arranging with creditors to pay down a debt over time and then working hard to make good on that promise.

 

GaryCnf

(1,399 posts)
59. Hey that's not fair
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 05:54 PM
Oct 2017

Don't you know that this is about bashing Bernie, not about paying bills? Expect a Burlington College story complete with a choice Brady Toensing quote any minute now.

George II

(67,782 posts)
71. Not debt to others. Federal Campaign Finance laws prohibit candidate committee....
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:16 PM
Oct 2017

...from "writing off" debt.

From time to time candidates "write off" debt, but in those cases they are personal loans made to their own campaign. Mitt Romney wrote off a $45M debt to himself back in 2012.

It's nothing to applaud that he paid a municipality about $30,000 a year after the debt was incurred, considering he's had a $5M surplus since the end of his campaign.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
73. He doesn't deserve applause for late payment of a substantial bill. And, no, it isn't legal
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:20 PM
Oct 2017

for a campaign to "write off" its debts.

Someone who lent money to a campaign -- such as a candidate or family member -- could decide to write off the loan.

But the campaign itself couldn't disavow any debt it had legally incurred.

 

Philistein

(25 posts)
74. Not unusual
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:21 PM
Oct 2017

Many candidates, including some I support and like very much, have taken two or three years to settle up. Completely unremarkable.

George II

(67,782 posts)
75. Only in cases where the candidate's committee ended the campaign with a negative balance...
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:23 PM
Oct 2017

...in this case the campaign has $5M in the bank.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders pays Natio...