General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders pays National City campaign bill
Secret Service declines to spring for candidate's security costs
By Bruce Kauffman, Oct. 8, 2017
More than a year after Bernie Sanders led a high-spirited rally in a public park in National City during his run for the presidency, he's finally paid his bill of more than $28,000 in municipal services, the mayor said Friday (October 6).
The money had been put up by the city mainly for overtime pay for police, fire, and public works personnel. Sixteen city blocks were blockaded for the May 21, 2016, campaign appearance in Kimball Park, an expanse that presents a challenge to security as it is flanked by high-rise apartment buildings. The Sanders camp gave the city three days' notice to do its part to host the event.
On August 1, 2017, the city council voted to sue. It wanted $28,340 in out-of-pocket expenses and about $3000 more in penalties and interest, On October 4th, officials were notified the Sanders campaign would pay up interest, penalties, and all.
We'd sent them notice after notice, mayor Ron Morrison said by phone from Albuquerque, where he has been taking a few days of relaxation. The city no longer has to sue. We're done with it now. We were not, quote, 'making money, unquote, on this.
Read more: https://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2017/oct/08/stringers-bernie-sanders-pays-national-city/#
About the San Diego Reader:
The San Diego Reader is the largest alternative press paper in the county of San Diego, distributed free in stands and private businesses throughout the county, funded by advertisements. Averaging 90,000 copies per issue, it reportedly has the largest circulation of any alternative weekly publication in the nation. It frequently presents an opposing viewpoint to the San Diego Union Tribune, the primary printed newspaper in the city.
...........................................
Noted for its literary style of journalism and coverage of the arts, particularly film and theater, the Reader is recognized as a pioneer among alternative weeklies for both its creative nonfiction and its commercial scheme, using ad revenue (particularly from classifieds and entertainment promotions) to establish the practice of widespread free circulation, a cornerstone of today's alternative papers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Diego_Reader
Response to George II (Original post)
Purveyor This message was self-deleted by its author.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Definition of salacious
1 :arousing or appealing to sexual desire or imagination
2 :lecherous, lustful
Which one were you referring to?
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Bernie...
RandySF
(58,706 posts)He's still paying bills.
George II
(67,782 posts)....
1 :arousing or appealing to sexual desire or imagination
2 :lecherous, lustful
PS - why did you delete your first post where you called me salacious?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)That's funny!
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL me sad now
George II
(67,782 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,731 posts)My opinion of Daniel Day Lewis is entirely salacious.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)As fast as Sanders rose it not surprising there are still outstanding payments out there. The growth of his campaign was so rapid that it became obvious where resources were being used and where they werent. Almost all resources were being used to keep the appearance of energy, youth, and numbers. They held many rallies with under five days notice. Everywhere he went, even on short notice, the stands were full. It became the cornerstone of his campaign, got him a lot of his news coverage, and gave his candidacy the image that it was worthy.
The resources needed were huge. Accounting was truly put on the back burner. A lot of oversite was put on the back burner. It was and still is the most impressive thing they did. I believe it took Weaver to do it. The Way they fed the energy of the beast was amazing. It also required them to overlook certain areas until a later date. I really dont find it shocking this debt or others are outstanding. They also have a commitment to those who gave it to spend it with due care.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)I can't think of a good enough excuse for this...maybe they forgot.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)Specially when there are possible grounds for dispute. I doubt this was/is the only outstanding bill.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)here would agree.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)Lawsuits force people into quicker action. It's a tool many of us use for debt collection. Specially when there are issues surrounding the certainty of the debt.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)wrong. And if someone else was involved most would agree. They knew they owed the money...but ignored the bills.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....to "debt collection" when the debtor has $5M in the bank?
moriah
(8,311 posts)In 2008, I had enough money to donate to some campaigns.
I volunteered for Hillary but didn't donate in the primary because I wanted to save it, and put that and more money into the General. Once it was over, I donated to help clear Hillary's campaign debt. It wasn't as high of a priority and so I did donate less than to the General, but I did keep up a monthly little bit until it was covered.
I can understand if Sanders supporters waited until after the general to donate to clear primary debt. And I can understand if they had prioritized the primary and general first, then took a little longer to help their candidate pay the bills from running.
Anyway, it's not yet been a full year since the General. And if I read it right, the Sanders campaign also paid the penalty the city requested as the late fee.
I was a Hill supporter, and I agree -- unlike Trump, we Democrats pay our debts. It took Hill a long time to get hers fully paid from 2008. But she did.
George II
(67,782 posts)...it had a surplus in the millions of dollars and even today has more than $5 million in it's treasury.
And it was more than a year after the debt was incurred. The date of the General Election is irrelevant, he wasn't a candidate in the General Election and suspended all campaigning (and incurring debt) around the time of the Democratic National Convention, July 2016.
Gothmog
(145,079 posts)aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)lapucelle
(18,238 posts)on his other rally-related debts as well.
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/communities/south-county/sd-me-sanders-sued-0824-story.html
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)would have exceeded these bills. Of course most of those lawsuits were dropped quickly after the media moved on, but still, mounting lawsuits to manipulate opinion has to be pretty expensive.
kacekwl
(7,016 posts)How dare he.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)What crust...
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)When you have a real shot at the presidency candidates tend to spend money they don't have rather than fall short for lack of resources. Then, the responsible ones, make an effort over time to make good on their debts. Here is what happened after the last Democratic Party contested nomination for President. And Hillary made good, like she was supposed to do. It just takes time
Hillary Clinton's campaign debt finally paid off
Posted by
CNN Political Research Director Robert Yoon
Washington (CNN) More than four years after suspending her 2008 presidential bid, now-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has finally paid off her campaign debt.
Clinton's presidential organization spent the final day of 2012 paying down the remaining debt, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission late Tuesday...
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/22/hillary-clintons-campaign-debt-finally-paid-off/
George II
(67,782 posts)....Sanders on the other hand ended his campaign with more than $5M in his treasury.
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)I will try not to take the bait again.
Our real concern now should be keeping nuclear weapons away from those with tiny hands and immature brains.
Let go of your Bernie hate, he's not the problem.
George II
(67,782 posts)....by giving speeches to Wall Street is 110% false.
You can find details of the Federal Campaign Finance Laws here:
https://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/legislation/
JHan
(10,173 posts)smh
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)We have more important things to focus on, like a nuclear holocaust.
We should all be united to protect ourselves from this internal threat to our democracy. Bernie isn't the problem.
I, for one, love that people like Eminem are speaking out against Trump.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Really?
For who?
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)"accepting corporate money or giving lucrative speeches to Wall Street".
Okay, I'll play your game, just who were you referring to there? Yogi Berra? Tom Brady? Vladimir Putin? Taylor Swift?
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)You never answered my question, why haven't you and others moved on from the Democratic primary? What's the point of rehashing it over and over, don't you think there are more important issues right now?
Hillary and Bernie aren't the problem, let it go.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)then claim to be about letting things go? How weird is that.
edit: this thread is about current news of a threatened lawsuit.
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)You bring up a dishonest, unproven smear against our candidate right out of the primaries and then attack me. No wonder you have no response.
George II
(67,782 posts)..."rehashed it"?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)other candidates took corporate contributions, and financed their campaign with speaking fees?
Do you have the courage of your convictions?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)psyche that most people dont even realize when they are repeating lies.
Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #61)
Post removed
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)impure candidates are gonna not get the votes needed to keep the fascists out.
count on it
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)It takes privileged white straight men, and the women who love them, to not see the problem with that.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Care to put your money where you mouth is?
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)Endless dishonest smears against our nominee should have no place here.
In the meantime, there's an actual, real, open fraud FBI investigation, and it's not about Hillary.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)That's totally different. Everybody knows 'hey I don't have the money' is a legit excuse for not paying bills. For four years.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)You'll obviously have a million reasons why one is the crime of the century and the other is totally okay.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Can't back up your post?
Not playing this game.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Not surprisingly, considering the horses you seem to have backed.
That's not it. Sorry.
It's exactly that.
Is that clearer?
George II
(67,782 posts)I guess you don't have much of an understanding of how campaign finances work or how they're governed by Federal and State law.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Doesn't stop some from posting, tho.
melman
(7,681 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)and the question.
Not to mention what meets the definition of "revolution."
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/29/bernie-sanders-ballot-losses-238889
George II
(67,782 posts)That's just devastating. How will I ever recover?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)Oh wait...it actually doesn't.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)At least... if you've been reading the thread.
Especially the part where someone makes false accusation that a candidate took corporate donations or speaking fees for a campaign, in violation of campaign finance law, then scurrying away when confronted on it.
Coming back to you now?
lapucelle
(18,238 posts)or the threat of embarrassing lawsuits finally compelling payment with funds on hand that were more than sufficient to pay the money owed with $5,000,000 to spare.
Nor do I recall an argument being made that American taxpayers should pay campaign event bills through funds dispersed to the Secret Service.
Of course, the picture would be clearer if we had a full accounting of the finances, but alas, we don't. Even after returning certain questionable contributions (as per agreement with the FEC), the campaign ended $5,455,167.90 in the black. That was more than enough to pay the debt of $449,409.01.
https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/P60007168/?cycle=2016&election_full=True
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/08/18/20074/how-bernie-sanders-beat-clock-and-avoided-disclosure
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/San-Diego-Demands-Payment-from-Sanders-Campaign--396957901.html
George II
(67,782 posts)sheshe2
(83,718 posts)lapucelle
(18,238 posts)in arranging with creditors to pay down a debt over time and then working hard to make good on that promise.
sheshe2
(83,718 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)GaryCnf
(1,399 posts)Don't you know that this is about bashing Bernie, not about paying bills? Expect a Burlington College story complete with a choice Brady Toensing quote any minute now.
George II
(67,782 posts)Thank you for asking.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)sheshe2
(83,718 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Bernie pays his!
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...from "writing off" debt.
From time to time candidates "write off" debt, but in those cases they are personal loans made to their own campaign. Mitt Romney wrote off a $45M debt to himself back in 2012.
It's nothing to applaud that he paid a municipality about $30,000 a year after the debt was incurred, considering he's had a $5M surplus since the end of his campaign.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)for a campaign to "write off" its debts.
Someone who lent money to a campaign -- such as a candidate or family member -- could decide to write off the loan.
But the campaign itself couldn't disavow any debt it had legally incurred.
Philistein
(25 posts)Many candidates, including some I support and like very much, have taken two or three years to settle up. Completely unremarkable.
George II
(67,782 posts)...in this case the campaign has $5M in the bank.