General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo brain tumor or abnormality found in brain of Las Vegas shooter
Officials working to piece together why Stephen Paddock meticulously planned his sniper attack on Las Vegas concertgoers a little more than a week ago now might have one less clue.
Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo told the Las Vegas Review-Journal an autopsy of Paddock's brain revealed no abnormalities as of Tuesday, ending theories that the mass killer had a disorder or brain tumor.
Lombardo told the newspaper he didn't have any information on results from Paddock's toxicology test, which would show whether he was under the influence of any drugs or alcohol at the time of his death.
http://www.newsweek.com/autopsy-las-vegas-gunman-brain-fails-find-abnormal-report-682704
Want to be surprised... or not? Google "brain tumor" and put up names like Jason Dalton, Omar Mateen, and other shooters. I'm sure you can already guess which names get more association with brain tumors and which ones don't.
But I'm sure it's just a big fat coincidence, right?
Sneederbunk
(14,289 posts)mercuryblues
(14,530 posts)He loved to hunt according to his brother. Bored rich man went hunting for humans.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Thanks for the link
CatMor
(6,212 posts)Response to CatMor (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Mass shooter, mid 196's...He had a brain tumor...It happens, and there's nothing unusual in considering the possibility in a mass shooting minus an apparent motive.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)So well never really know for sure. We DO know that most of us can think of some pretty horrific crimes committed by people under the influence of amphetamines, bur only that one guy, fifty five years ago, with a tumor who was also on speed.
In Whitmans case well never know for sure, I guess, but tumor doesnt seem to be a common denominator to many other crimes.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 12, 2017, 07:43 AM - Edit history (1)
My only problem is with the idea that some are creating a "fantasy" to "excuse" a mass killer because he's white -- It's ludicrous on its face.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...if the coroner had a fully intact brain to autopsy.
Paddock took his own life, according to reports, and my guess would be that he did it with a pistol or revolver to the cranium.
On edit:
Not that I subscribe to the tumor theory, none of the interviews and comments I have heard from people who knew him give me reason to suspect a physically or chemically malfunctioning brain.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)He shot himself through the mouth.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)To biopsy a few random cells.
tblue37
(65,319 posts)Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)They have been doing this kind of thing for a long time. And this is obviously a high-profile case.
If they say he didn't have a brain tumor, you can rest assured that he didn't have a brain tumor. It was a long shot, anyway. People will do anything to resist the idea that he was just another gun-humping psycho amongst thousands of gun-humping psychos in this great country of ours.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Charles Whitman, Texas mass shooter of the mid 1960's did have a brain tumor..No ''coincidence' necessary.
...
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,489 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,706 posts)That's enough of an abnormality of the brain.
Amishman
(5,555 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)Something about super concentrated weed crystals or something messing with his head.
Never heard of this phenomenon until recently... wonder if they did a drug test.