Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,045 posts)
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 08:40 PM Oct 2017

No brain tumor or abnormality found in brain of Las Vegas shooter

Officials working to piece together why Stephen Paddock meticulously planned his sniper attack on Las Vegas concertgoers a little more than a week ago now might have one less clue. 

Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo told the Las Vegas Review-Journal an autopsy of Paddock's brain revealed no abnormalities as of Tuesday, ending theories that the mass killer had a disorder or brain tumor. 

Lombardo told the newspaper he didn't have any information on results from Paddock's toxicology test, which would show whether he was under the influence of any drugs or alcohol at the time of his death. 

http://www.newsweek.com/autopsy-las-vegas-gunman-brain-fails-find-abnormal-report-682704

Want to be surprised... or not? Google "brain tumor" and put up names like Jason Dalton, Omar Mateen, and other shooters. I'm sure you can already guess which names get more association with brain tumors and which ones don't.

But I'm sure it's just a big fat coincidence, right?

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No brain tumor or abnormality found in brain of Las Vegas shooter (Original Post) ck4829 Oct 2017 OP
Just a gun owner living out a fantasy. Sneederbunk Oct 2017 #1
basically it mercuryblues Oct 2017 #5
White killer so must be brain tumor fantasy ended finally . I don't think trump has one either lunasun Oct 2017 #2
Trump doesn't have a brain. CatMor Oct 2017 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2017 #14
What "fantasy"? Google "Charles Whitman, Texas". whathehell Oct 2017 #9
He was also high on speed Nevernose Oct 2017 #17
..and though it's the first I've heard it, I have NO problem believing it. whathehell Oct 2017 #19
I'd be curious to know... NeoGreen Oct 2017 #3
Good point! MoonRiver Oct 2017 #6
Good point! Doreen Oct 2017 #7
He kissed his gun. TexasProgresive Oct 2017 #11
No, he didn't do it with a pistol to the cranium. LisaL Oct 2017 #15
You dont need the whole brain Nevernose Oct 2017 #18
He put the gun in his mouth, so the brain was not intact. nt tblue37 Oct 2017 #21
The coroners know what they are doing. Dave Starsky Oct 2017 #22
Interesting.. whathehell Oct 2017 #8
Does not prove he was not mentally ill. n/t KY_EnviroGuy Oct 2017 #10
I'm sure Stephen Paddock supported the NRA. dubyadiprecession Oct 2017 #12
A quick search shows that he was not a member, any way to see if he was a donor? Amishman Oct 2017 #20
Also no soul. Lint Head Oct 2017 #13
I heard a report that he had been 'dabbing' the last several weeks prior. JoeStuckInOH Oct 2017 #16

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
2. White killer so must be brain tumor fantasy ended finally . I don't think trump has one either
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 08:46 PM
Oct 2017


Thanks for the link

Response to CatMor (Reply #4)

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
9. What "fantasy"? Google "Charles Whitman, Texas".
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:14 PM
Oct 2017

Mass shooter, mid 196's...He had a brain tumor...It happens, and there's nothing unusual in considering the possibility in a mass shooting minus an apparent motive.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
17. He was also high on speed
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:31 PM
Oct 2017

So we’ll never really know for sure. We DO know that most of us can think of some pretty horrific crimes committed by people under the influence of amphetamines, bur only that one guy, fifty five years ago, with a tumor — who was also on speed.

In Whitman’s case we’ll never know for sure, I guess, but “tumor” doesn’t seem to be a common denominator to many other crimes.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
19. ..and though it's the first I've heard it, I have NO problem believing it.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:05 AM
Oct 2017

Last edited Thu Oct 12, 2017, 07:43 AM - Edit history (1)

My only problem is with the idea that some are creating a "fantasy" to "excuse" a mass killer because he's white -- It's ludicrous on its face.

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
3. I'd be curious to know...
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 08:47 PM
Oct 2017

...if the coroner had a fully intact brain to autopsy.

Paddock took his own life, according to reports, and my guess would be that he did it with a pistol or revolver to the cranium.

On edit:
Not that I subscribe to the tumor theory, none of the interviews and comments I have heard from people who knew him give me reason to suspect a physically or chemically malfunctioning brain.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
22. The coroners know what they are doing.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:19 AM
Oct 2017

They have been doing this kind of thing for a long time. And this is obviously a high-profile case.

If they say he didn't have a brain tumor, you can rest assured that he didn't have a brain tumor. It was a long shot, anyway. People will do anything to resist the idea that he was just another gun-humping psycho amongst thousands of gun-humping psychos in this great country of ours.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
8. Interesting..
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 09:01 PM
Oct 2017

Charles Whitman, Texas mass shooter of the mid 1960's did have a brain tumor..No ''coincidence' necessary.
...

 

JoeStuckInOH

(544 posts)
16. I heard a report that he had been 'dabbing' the last several weeks prior.
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 11:22 PM
Oct 2017

Something about super concentrated weed crystals or something messing with his head.
Never heard of this phenomenon until recently... wonder if they did a drug test.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No brain tumor or abnorma...