Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HAB911

(8,867 posts)
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:29 PM Oct 2017

Roy Moore: Kneeling During Anthem Is Against the Law

Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore claims that professional athletes kneeling during the national anthem is against the law. In an interview with TIME, published Wednesday, the far-right Republican argued that athletes protesting police brutality violate a section of the U.S. code on conduct while the national anthem is playing. “It’s against the law, you know that?” the former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice. “It was a act of Congress that every man stand and put their hand over their heart. That’s the law.” He added: “If they didn’t have it in there, it would just be tradition. But this is law. If we disobey this, what else are we going to disobey?” The candidate’s comments came without any acknowledgement of his own history with the law: Moore was suspended in 2016 for the remainder of his term after ordering Alabama judges to not enforce the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling—the law of the land—on same-sex marriage.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/roy-moore-kneeling-during-anthem-is-against-the-law

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roy Moore: Kneeling During Anthem Is Against the Law (Original Post) HAB911 Oct 2017 OP
another malignant narcissist who thinks reality is what ever pops into his twisted head. Thomas Hurt Oct 2017 #1
NO. IT'S FUCKING NOT. HughBeaumont Oct 2017 #2
See also: Initech Oct 2017 #14
Molly Ivans already answered this debate: Wwcd Oct 2017 #35
+100. Different Drummer Oct 2017 #55
Thanks. I needed a place to vent. Wwcd Oct 2017 #58
Amen! That's a big reason as to why I'm here. n/t Different Drummer Oct 2017 #60
Welcome.... SergeStorms Oct 2017 #63
Yes, that is what it means, but "Trumpkins are stupid blind" fits also! Lol Wwcd Oct 2017 #67
In the country of the blind the one-eyed man is king. That is a saying I tblue37 Oct 2017 #68
She sure did have a way with words. Dave Starsky Oct 2017 #65
+100. Barnett. But it would be if religious fascists got their way, Hortensis Oct 2017 #29
Which law are we talking about, you asshole? GoCubsGo Oct 2017 #3
He's not entirely making it up. Ms. Toad Oct 2017 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author sarah FAILIN Oct 2017 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author uncle ray Oct 2017 #54
? ...'should'... vs 'have to'...? duhneece Oct 2017 #64
Should is a recommendation, not a requirement. n/t Ms. Toad Oct 2017 #69
That's what I thougt. Thank you. nt duhneece Oct 2017 #80
What a shithead this guy is! n/t RKP5637 Oct 2017 #4
If it isn't illegal now, it will become illegal if these wackadoodles keep getting elected. HopeAgain Oct 2017 #5
The average viewer of 'Law and Order' might know more about the law, than he does Siwsan Oct 2017 #6
Actually, it isn't against the law, and as a lawyer and former judge The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2017 #7
He knows... defacto7 Oct 2017 #12
No, he doesn't maxsolomon Oct 2017 #15
You're right. He also thinks US law is based on the bible, and not English Common Law A HERETIC I AM Oct 2017 #23
Hey Roy: FUCK YOUR "BUY-BULL" (shit) DinahMoeHum Oct 2017 #42
Ocelot is right SCantiGOP Oct 2017 #57
Every Attorney Knows the Difference in Words of Command ("shall) and Suggestion("should") Stallion Oct 2017 #20
I think you're correct. defacto7 Oct 2017 #41
Not to mention actual, you know, LAW and not merely suggested PROTOCOL. WinkyDink Oct 2017 #47
Here it is, for people who want to look it up. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #24
See post #7. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2017 #32
+ struggle4progress Oct 2017 #28
Any CHILD knows there is no such law. WinkyDink Oct 2017 #45
The very idea that idiots like Moore and Gohmert... 3catwoman3 Oct 2017 #66
The perfect example of a conservative christian sharp_stick Oct 2017 #8
Which law???? Lifelong Protester Oct 2017 #9
Really? Where does it say in the constitution? Initech Oct 2017 #10
It's critical that JustAnotherGen Oct 2017 #11
There seems to be more crazies in the GOPs Iliyah Oct 2017 #13
and they get more looney tunes everyday. Alice11111 Oct 2017 #16
And we all thought that Ted Cruz was crazy. Yavin4 Oct 2017 #21
As no penalty is mentioned rock Oct 2017 #17
If this keeps up, MEN WILL BE MARRYING MEN!!1!!1!!1! NT mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #18
I married my husband 4 years ago swimboy Oct 2017 #71
Well, it's not like the guy knew the law and was a judge at one point. Yavin4 Oct 2017 #19
Narrator (Ron Howard): "It isn't." nt Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2017 #22
Voting for Roy Moore should be against the law. louis-t Oct 2017 #25
hahaha... yesss!! InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #27
At first, I thought this had to be an Onion satire article. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #26
There is no code on the National Anthem. There is a Flag Code, but that's code of conduct, not law. haele Oct 2017 #30
There is a National Anthem Code. 36 U.S. Code 301. But it doesn't *require* you The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2017 #33
I sit corrected. Still, there's nothing punitive in there, it's just a ceremonial description. haele Oct 2017 #34
Exactly. It says, basically, it would be nice if you stood, The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2017 #37
"Should" isn't the same as "Shall", Moore is a complete idiot I thought he was The_Casual_Observer Oct 2017 #38
These are merely recommendations. NONE of it is LAW!!!! WinkyDink Oct 2017 #49
says the southern white supremacist about the black athlete spanone Oct 2017 #31
What's scary is that this idiot is a judge, he is supposed to know the law MiniMe Oct 2017 #39
I'm sure he does. defacto7 Oct 2017 #46
Well, he certainly found his niche of RW kookiness. aikoaiko Oct 2017 #43
O.M.G. There should be a law against such incredible stupidity. WinkyDink Oct 2017 #44
American ISIS n/t. NutmegYankee Oct 2017 #48
Look, people; it's ALSO "CODE" that the US flag not fly in inclement weather. But it isn't against WinkyDink Oct 2017 #50
The US Code (not the flag code) is the law. Ms. Toad Oct 2017 #59
Who taught him Constitutional Law 101? n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #51
University of Alabama Law School mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #72
Nice try, Moore, but we're not there... yet.. We still have rights. ecstatic Oct 2017 #52
As legal professional... syringis Oct 2017 #53
If you really want to blow his mind, ask about Jehovah's Witnesses. NutmegYankee Oct 2017 #56
I'll be sure to give him a seig heil next time I see him. louis-t Oct 2017 #61
Moore doesn't know.... SergeStorms Oct 2017 #62
Supporting Trump is illegal SCantiGOP Oct 2017 #70
Roy Moore can shove a 10 commandments monument up his stupid ass. Orrex Oct 2017 #73
Or Two! ProfessorGAC Oct 2017 #75
Well, how many asses does he have? Orrex Oct 2017 #76
Just The One ProfessorGAC Oct 2017 #77
what an ignorant man. spanone Oct 2017 #74
Sounds like Roy LESS. Amirite? Orrex Oct 2017 #78
Roy Moore: A judge who doesn't know how to read. ExciteBike66 Oct 2017 #79
It's also against the law to put the Ten Commandments in front of a courthouse Generic Other Oct 2017 #81

Initech

(100,038 posts)
14. See also:
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:50 PM
Oct 2017
Amendment 1:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


These people do not know or care who they are hurting.
 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
35. Molly Ivans already answered this debate:
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 03:05 PM
Oct 2017

"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag".
~Molly Ivins

 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
58. Thanks. I needed a place to vent.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 08:27 PM
Oct 2017

He's been dragging us through mental hell, sometimes you hit that wall of no return & just have to speak up.

SergeStorms

(19,186 posts)
63. Welcome....
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 10:22 PM
Oct 2017

and I think we're all here for the same reason. I like your sig line, loosely translated 'in the land of the blind that king has one eye'? Or something like that. It's been a long time since Latin class back in high school. I'm aware of the adage, "In the land of the blind the one eyed man is King", but I've never seen it in Latin before. Or maybe I'm horribly wrong and it means 'Donald Trump is a big, fat turd".
Anyway, welcome to Democratic Underground, and feel free to commiserate to your heart's content. We're all in this together.

 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
67. Yes, that is what it means, but "Trumpkins are stupid blind" fits also! Lol
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 11:37 PM
Oct 2017

"In the land of the blind the one eyed man is King"

"The Italians have the same saying, “In un mondo di ciechi un orbo è re.”
The German people have their version of the proverb: “Those that rule must hear and be deaf, must see and be blind.”
And the French people also have their own version of the proverb: “When a blind man bears the standard, pity those who follow.”
Some say it’s a variation of a Bible quote found in Matthew 15:14 that states:

“If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.”

It’s also found in Luke 6:39 as:

“Can a blind man lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit?”

I know it as an old Latin quote.



tblue37

(65,227 posts)
68. In the country of the blind the one-eyed man is king. That is a saying I
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 12:19 AM
Oct 2017

use all the time with my students when I explain that there is always a relative component to their grades. If everyone else is performing abysmally, then mediocrity can look good by comparison.

I also tell them the joke about two guys running from a grizzly bear. One says, "What's the use? We'll never outrun the bear!"

the other responds, "I don't have to outrun the bear. I just have to outrun you.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
65. She sure did have a way with words.
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 07:20 AM
Oct 2017

If only she could be around to write about the nightmare we're living through today.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
29. +100. Barnett. But it would be if religious fascists got their way,
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 03:00 PM
Oct 2017

of course.

Birth of a new fascism? Trumpers meet theocrats at right-wing Christian conclave
Roy Moore says “the people of God are rising up,” while Sebastian Gorka hints at a sinister new alliance
Salon.

After all, fascism and conservative religion, fundamentalist especially, are natural, strongly authoritarian bedfellows, and many Americans find the burden of being free people too much and really feel a need to be told who to vote for and why, and a duty to follow.

Love how, for them, freedom is really mostly focused on control of their own money and property, while "small government" should never be too small to control what happens in our beds. And our churches.

GoCubsGo

(32,074 posts)
3. Which law are we talking about, you asshole?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:32 PM
Oct 2017

What "act of Congress"???

Another demented nutjob who makes shit up.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
36. He's not entirely making it up.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 03:06 PM
Oct 2017

Here's what he is referring to:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36/301

But the first amendment freedom of expression to speak, or remain silent, whether by words or expressive conduct, trumps an ettiquette provision of the code.

Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #36)

Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #36)

duhneece

(4,110 posts)
64. ? ...'should'... vs 'have to'...?
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 07:07 AM
Oct 2017

I don't know enough about the law to know how this difference affects the kneeling

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
5. If it isn't illegal now, it will become illegal if these wackadoodles keep getting elected.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:33 PM
Oct 2017

These at truly frightening times.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,587 posts)
7. Actually, it isn't against the law, and as a lawyer and former judge
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:36 PM
Oct 2017

he should know that.

36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem

(a)Designation.—
The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b)Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1) when the flag is displayed—
(A) individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B) members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C) all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(2) when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.


It says "should," not "shall," "will" or "must." That means it's just advisory, not mandatory, and therefore it's not illegal to fail to do those things. If it was, they'd have to arrest half the beer-guzzling, hotdog-eating, sitting-on-their-asses, texting, nose-picking audience members at every sports event.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,362 posts)
23. You're right. He also thinks US law is based on the bible, and not English Common Law
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 02:48 PM
Oct 2017

I despise Roy Moore. He represents everything wrong with Christianity run amok and he shouldn't be allowed within 1000 yards of the Capitol Building

Paraphrasing the great defense lawyer Gerry Spence;

"The only reason most attorneys seek a judgeship is because they were crappy lawyers to begin with"

Stallion

(6,473 posts)
20. Every Attorney Knows the Difference in Words of Command ("shall) and Suggestion("should")
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 02:43 PM
Oct 2017

his argument is in bad faith

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
41. I think you're correct.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 06:23 PM
Oct 2017

Athough there is a lot of stupid going around I can't keep blaming stupid for every case of bad faith and twisted ideology that comes along. Right wing extremists especially rw religious extremists, make the law into whatever fits their belief quirk.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,290 posts)
24. Here it is, for people who want to look it up.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 02:52 PM
Oct 2017

I know you can find it, but I've been looking up regulations in the eCFR (Electronic Code of Federal Regulations) all day long, so I might as well throw in something from the U.S. Code.

I doubt it will set off a red flag for IT.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2016-title36/pdf/USCODE-2016-title36-subtitleI.pdf

Go on down to page 39 of the print edition, which is page 27 of the .pdf file.

"Should" this, "should" that, and "should" the other.

Initech

(100,038 posts)
10. Really? Where does it say in the constitution?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:37 PM
Oct 2017

Kneeling during the anthem was freedom of speech and freedom of protest last I checked.

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
11. It's critical that
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:38 PM
Oct 2017

Reporters do their job and 'fact' check these interviews - especially when in print.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
13. There seems to be more crazies in the GOPs
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 01:49 PM
Oct 2017

and more want to get high up in the political ladder to fuck up the USA.

Yavin4

(35,421 posts)
21. And we all thought that Ted Cruz was crazy.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 02:44 PM
Oct 2017

There's no limit to Republican crazy. They're like Batman villains. They get worse and worse.

swimboy

(7,283 posts)
71. I married my husband 4 years ago
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 10:46 PM
Oct 2017

No damage to a single heterosexual marriage has resulted; further, there have been no reports of dogs marrying turtles.

haele

(12,640 posts)
30. There is no code on the National Anthem. There is a Flag Code, but that's code of conduct, not law.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 03:01 PM
Oct 2017

The Flag Code also only applies - as a code of conduct, not anything actually legal with punitive measures - to government personnel and government property.
Unless we are in BizzaroLand and the NFL is part of the Government, players can do whatever they choose within the laws concerning public exhibition (i.e., they can't drop trow in public...) whenever the Flag is presented and the anthem played.

What a small-minded, snowglobe-dwelling Doofus. #notajudgeRoyMoore

Haele

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,587 posts)
33. There is a National Anthem Code. 36 U.S. Code 301. But it doesn't *require* you
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 03:04 PM
Oct 2017

to do anything.

(a)Designation.—
The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b)Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1) when the flag is displayed—
(A) individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B) members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C) all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(2) when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
46. I'm sure he does.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 06:32 PM
Oct 2017

He just wants it to do what he wants, even if he has to step on it and twist it to meet his will.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
50. Look, people; it's ALSO "CODE" that the US flag not fly in inclement weather. But it isn't against
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 06:40 PM
Oct 2017

the LAW if it does!

One looks to LAWS to know what is legal or not, NOT to "CODES."

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
59. The US Code (not the flag code) is the law.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 09:15 PM
Oct 2017

36 United States Code Sec. 301, specifically.

However, this particular law does not REQUIRE compliance. The language is permissive (should), not mandatory (shall).

ecstatic

(32,652 posts)
52. Nice try, Moore, but we're not there... yet.. We still have rights.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 07:01 PM
Oct 2017

Who knows for how much longer but right now we still have the right to free speech and freedom of religion. I don't have to do shit for a flag or racist song if I don't feel like it. Oh, and FUCK YOU!!!

syringis

(5,101 posts)
53. As legal professional...
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 07:02 PM
Oct 2017

He have an hazardous and arbitrary interpretation of the legislation...

It is not the first time.

As if he found his diploma in a lucky bag rather than being graduated from an university.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
56. If you really want to blow his mind, ask about Jehovah's Witnesses.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 07:11 PM
Oct 2017

They do not believe in flag ceremonies including the pledge. They consider it a prayer to a worldly thing (country) and not God. And yet - It's Freedom of Religion!

SergeStorms

(19,186 posts)
62. Moore doesn't know....
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 10:13 PM
Oct 2017

shit from shine-ola. That reminds me of Steve Martin in 'The Jerk'. I'm too lazy right now or I'd go look for it.

SCantiGOP

(13,865 posts)
70. Supporting Trump is illegal
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 04:25 PM
Oct 2017

Believe me.

By the way, I am as accurate and as qualified to make that statement as Moore was.

ExciteBike66

(2,297 posts)
79. Roy Moore: A judge who doesn't know how to read.
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 10:32 AM
Oct 2017

36 US Code 301: (C) all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart;

The operative word there is "should". Any judge "should" be able to tell you that "should" does not mean "must".

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
81. It's also against the law to put the Ten Commandments in front of a courthouse
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 09:09 AM
Oct 2017

It didn't stop this scofflaw!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roy Moore: Kneeling Durin...