Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 03:17 PM Oct 2017

Quentin Tarantino - 'if I had acted on what I knew, I would have had to stop working with Harvey'

...but I didn't want to stop working with Harvey, so I pretended it wasn't a pattern, even when several women I know, including my own girlfriend, told me about it.'


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/movies/tarantino-weinstein.html

Quentin Tarantino, the Hollywood director most closely tied to Harvey Weinstein, has known for decades about the producer's alleged misconduct toward women and now feels ashamed he did not take a stronger stand and stop working with him, he said in an interview.

"I knew enough to do more than I did," he said, citing several episodes involving prominent actresses. "There was more to it than just the normal rumors, the normal gossip. It wasn't secondhand. I knew he did a couple of these things."

"I wish I had taken responsibility for what I heard," he added. "If I had done the work I should have done then, I would have had to not work with him."



This is rape culture in practice, everyone. A man with power decides not to use his power to stop a sexual abuser, even though he is a member of pretty much the only group who can do so with impunity, because he wants to work with the abuser.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quentin Tarantino - 'if I had acted on what I knew, I would have had to stop working with Harvey' (Original Post) KitSileya Oct 2017 OP
Accessory after the fact? Misprison in Felony? HopeAgain Oct 2017 #1
Good to know. Loki Liesmith Oct 2017 #2
It isn't a crime on the books as is, KitSileya Oct 2017 #3
Okay, I overstated it HopeAgain Oct 2017 #4
Yup. As I wrote, he's a member of the only group who could have stopped Weinstein KitSileya Oct 2017 #7
Normally I don't like to judge too strongly off appearances, linuxman Oct 2017 #5
That's called taking responsibility maxsolomon Oct 2017 #6
Taking responsibility? More like getting out in front of the accusations KitSileya Oct 2017 #8
Everyone likes to throw stones maxsolomon Oct 2017 #9
I give Quentin props for taking responsibility. Downtown Hound Oct 2017 #10
If he had acted on what he knew, he might only be worth $50 million instead of $100 million. WillowTree Oct 2017 #11

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
1. Accessory after the fact? Misprison in Felony?
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 03:25 PM
Oct 2017

Mr. Tarantino is GUILTY. I would say that I am going to boycott his movies, but I find them to be all alike -- another gruesome fantasy about self righteous violence. So I wouldn't see any more anyway.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
3. It isn't a crime on the books as is,
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 03:36 PM
Oct 2017

but it does tell us a whole lot about the person Quentin Tarantino, doesn't it?

At least in my eyes, he is shown as not a very good person at all. Why would I give him my money when he is such a cowardly, self-serving egotist?

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
4. Okay, I overstated it
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 03:42 PM
Oct 2017

Your right, it absolutely tells us who he is. My point was that staying silent can be a wrongful act in itself.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
7. Yup. As I wrote, he's a member of the only group who could have stopped Weinstein
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 04:08 PM
Oct 2017

with impunity - a powerful white man in Hollywood. He has a secure career, there's absolutely no chance he'd get blow-back from exposing Weinstein. In fact, he would probably have received accolades if he had - you know, man not willing to risk his integrity for an abuser etc. However, Tarantino chose the self-serving way, and that lessened him a lot in my eyes.

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
5. Normally I don't like to judge too strongly off appearances,
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 03:44 PM
Oct 2017

But Tarantino has always struck me as an ultra-creepy, skeeze. This isn't doing anything to ease that impression, FWIW.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
8. Taking responsibility? More like getting out in front of the accusations
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 04:11 PM
Oct 2017

to protect himself. He wasn't very interested in protecting his colleagues, no, not even his own girlfriend. But we now know he has no problems protecting himself. How pusillanimous, gutless and self-centered he is.

maxsolomon

(33,251 posts)
9. Everyone likes to throw stones
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 04:33 PM
Oct 2017

but they're not in Hollywood trying to make movies in a sea of powerful predators like Weinstein. You need millions of dollars in funding. Everyone in Hollywood gets compromised. Everyone gets dirty.

Sexual Predation is integral to how that industry has always worked - ask Judy Garland's ghost. Ask Marilyn Monroe's ghost. Fuck, even Shirley Temple got assaulted.

Tarantino is admitting fault here. He's expressing regret. You think it's self-serving, fine. He's not the only one with guilt, and probably not the one with the most guilt.

Compare that to Woody Allen calling it a Witch Hunt, and lamenting you can't even wink at a pretty girl.



Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
10. I give Quentin props for taking responsibility.
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 04:40 PM
Oct 2017

Too all those criticizing him, just know that he's far from the only one to turn a blind eye to it. But so far, he's the only one who came forward and took responsibility for it.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
11. If he had acted on what he knew, he might only be worth $50 million instead of $100 million.
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 04:43 PM
Oct 2017

Boo effin' Hoo, Quentin. You're breakin' my heart.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Quentin Tarantino - 'if I...