Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,440 posts)
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 11:23 AM Oct 2017

I cannot believe that I actually say it but: thank you Whiny Donny for the twit

determining that tax treatment for 401K stays.

Right now, employees can contribute $18,000 a year ($24,000 for people older than 50) to their employer's 401K.

The Republicans want to reduce it to.... $2400! Why? Because cutting taxes for the wealthy requires some "adjustments."

The irony is that the recent nominee for the Nobel price in economy got it because he determined that people will not save on their own, so they should automatically be registered for contribution, should choose to "opt out."

Of course, he can always change his mind, but I hope that the ones with Republican reps should start howling..

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I cannot believe that I actually say it but: thank you Whiny Donny for the twit (Original Post) question everything Oct 2017 OP
McConnell re-pledged a 'deficit-neutral' tax reduction bill. yallerdawg Oct 2017 #1
LOL! He's such an ass, but the Repubs are actively evil. Hortensis Oct 2017 #2
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2017 #3
This proposal was never serious in the first place genxlib Oct 2017 #4

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
1. McConnell re-pledged a 'deficit-neutral' tax reduction bill.
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 11:29 AM
Oct 2017

Trump will try to cover Trump's ass, but he'll sign any 'win' they send him - and nothing is safe.

We're going to need 3 Republicans again.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. LOL! He's such an ass, but the Repubs are actively evil.
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 11:34 AM
Oct 2017

$2400 limit a year in pre-tax deductions? Reduced from $18,000?

Experts are unclear as to what he actually means, and best not to hold anyone's breath over his holding firm. He very likely doesn't know just what he meant himself.

I would prefer the evil ones got their way on this. It would get the outraged attention of 100 million people who really badly need cluing in. 2018 is coming up fast, and it probably wouldn't hurt anyone for very long.

I'm afraid their agents in the senate aren't stupid enough to drop it to $2400, though, even if somehow that got out of the house.

genxlib

(5,518 posts)
4. This proposal was never serious in the first place
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 12:31 PM
Oct 2017

Not because it would hurt us. Because it would hurt the financial services industry.

Once they got wind of it, the deal was dead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I cannot believe that I a...