General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre we headed toward a constitutional crisis?
Even more serious than the one we are presently in?
If Trump fires or attempts to fire Mueller, all hell would break loose. The Democrats would try to recruit Republican help in the Senate to stop him from doing it, or, more likely, re-appoint him as an independent counsel - who cannot be fired by the President - and let him continue the job he was hired to do.
If they were not successful, and did not have enough Republican votes, then the crisis would be in full bloom.
It would be a constitutional crisis and the Supreme Court would not involve themselves in such a dispute.
Is that the direction we are headed or will someone negotiate a deal with Donald Trump?
What do you think?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)"and the Supreme Court would not involve themselves in such a dispute."
Sure they would. They had no problem stepping in during Watergate in a dispute between the executive branch
and Congress.
kentuck
(111,052 posts)....but it could turn into a "constitutional crisis" if the Senate does not do its job.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)Donnie will try to fire Mueller or orchestrate it.
I could see him ordering Sessions to do it, regardless of recusal.
Odds are the GOP is going to stand around and keep their mouths shut.
They aren't doing anything to create a Nixon Redux unless they fear their seats in Congress are in jeopardy.
kentuck
(111,052 posts)One would hope that a few Republicans would show a little independence. They don't have to be "Democrats". Independents are somewhat removed from the over-whelming partisanship that now occupies both Parties, it seems to me.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Muller, I think he will just continue on.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)They can easily finish
ashling
(25,771 posts)for a sticky constitutional situation to be elevated to an official "constitutional crisis?"
just wondering as usual.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)And being sordidly enabled by a propaganda machine on the right that has the populace believing alternative scenarios in lieu of reality. When Mueller's Silver Hammer comes down upon their heads, a good 40% of our people will believe it to be itself a criminal act on the part of the Democratic Party.
Trump never allows an advantage to go untouched. He'll put every single person on the planet in peril in order to protect himself. If that much isn't obvious to all of us by now, we really have become immune to the dissonance. Of course he'll try to fire Mueller. Of course he'll pardon everyone including himself. Of course he'll start a war to secure his position in the Oval Office. Of course he'll throw every single member of his team to the wolves just to slow Mueller's march to displace him. Of course he'll protect Jr. and Ivanka before Jared, and Ivanka before Jr. He's so transparent, so easy to read. He'll light a match and run. He's the 666 his peeps have been warning us about for ages.
Initech
(100,038 posts)Every day that jackass is in power something bad happens that's worse than the day before it. If Obama or Hillary had one shoe drop, the GOP would have impeached, indicted, imprisoned and popped the champagne by now. Trump has had an entire industrial warehouse of shoes drop and nothing has changed. The GOP is drunk with power and we need to kick them in the ass now!
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Three of the many ways it could happen:
One is, he fires Mueller. Mueller goes to court to be reinstated, while Congress is pressured to impeach or reinstate Mueller.
Two is, Mueller indicts him, and everyone argues about whether he can indict a sitting president. This goes to the SCOTUS, and there is even more pressure to impeach. It should be noted here that despite what legal scholars say, both the Nixon and Clinton special counsels concluded they could indict a sitting president. Of course they would, prosecutors want to prosecute like fish want to swim.
Three is, Trump pardons everybody and Mueller decides to test the limits of pardon power. It is possible there is some limit. For example, if the pardon is being used to obstruct justice.
kentuck
(111,052 posts)...at which time he can be indicted and tried for any crimes he may have committed? But not while he is President.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)kentuck
(111,052 posts)then that would be a constitutional crisis.
Democrats should vote with those Republicans that are willing to challenge the White House and vote in the nation's interests.
Just my opinion.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)to make sure the GOP candidate would win.
doc03
(35,295 posts)an honest SCOTUS. Won't happen.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Six, if you count Roberts, who does the right thing once in a while.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)the 4th branch of government, I'd predict the Constitution cannot protect US.