White House has no intentions of firing Mueller?

[Johnny2X2X]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/30/politics/russia-investigation-manafort-latest/?lf-content=222696360:[e-mail]&hubRefSrc=permalink

Wait, they do not have the power to fire him I thought, right? They'd have to replace someone who would have this power.

They're acting like they can fire him to try to make it seem like they are OK with his investigation. It's like me saying, "well, I have no intentions of firing the police detective looking into my fraud." I don't have the power to.

[gopiscrap]

1. Yeah, I don't trust trump at all

[Johnny2X2X]

2. They can't fire him without first removing and replacing the person who can fire him.

They're throwing up a false narrative to try to make it seem like they are above the law.

[gopiscrap]

3. wouldn't that be the keebler elf?

maybe that's why trump and sessions are having lunch today!

[Tommy_Carcetti]

5. Supposedly it's Deputy AG Rosenstein. Sessions recused himself

Although in the ethical shitshow that is this administration, I suppose Sessions could unrecuse himself and then fire Mueller to get back in Trump's good graces.

I mean, none of these guys have any sort of moral compass, so why the hell not?

[gopiscrap]

6. yup that was what I was thinking also

[Kablooie]

4. T has to convince deputy AG to fire Mueller.

Or convince AG Sessions to fire deputy AG and replace him with someone who will.

Probably what their lunch today is about.