General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump should resign, Pence names Clinton as his VP, then Pence resigns - that is
what I want.
Won't happen but it is what I feel will begin to rectify the theft of the election.
dhol82
(9,352 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Now you've.got to get Pence to cooperate with your plan.
delisen
(6,042 posts)if Pence is also facing charges. (He is connected to Monafort).
Would a Pence facing jail time agree in exchange for a "stay out of jail card?" Maybe.
Response to delisen (Reply #5)
onenote This message was self-deleted by its author.
onenote
(42,609 posts)Deciding who gets to be president isn't his job. It's absurd to think he would even contemplate going there.
delisen
(6,042 posts)and the politics of Congress decided that Gerald ford would be acceptable to them and Nixon decided to follow the Congress and nominated Ford-whom everyone knew was likely to become president shortly thereafter.
Republican in congress may appear invincible and unwilling to do something that seems absurd based upon their past performance-but there is a lot we don't know at present.
I am bothered by democratic unwillingness to demand Justice with a capital J.
The very demand for justice by people makes a difference. For example we demand that violators of the law be tried for major crimes even though they may not be convicted by a prejudiced jury.
If there is strong evidence that Trump was installed in the Oval Office due to criminal actions, why would we not at the very least make the demand that things be set right?
I don't care if the opposition screams, laughs, spits in our faces, or whatever. To let the fear that it won't work or can't work keep us from making the demand means abdicating our role in a democracy,
The demand must be made. The right of the people to petition the government for redress of grievances must be made. It is our role.
boston bean
(36,219 posts)Election.
onenote
(42,609 posts)As for the Agnew example, the idea that "everyone knew" Ford "was likely to become president shortly thereafter" -- that's a rewrite of history not supported by the actual facts.
When Agnew resigned on October 10, 1973, Ford was the House Minority Leader and thus the logical person to take the position. Moreover, the Democrats didn't seek to push for one of their own to become VP even though, unlike today, the Democrats had strong majorities in both the Senate (56-42-2) and House (242-192--nearly identical to today's Repub majority).
And far from "everyone" knowing Nixon would "shortly" be out, when Ford was nominated on October 12, 1973, here are some of the events that hadn't yet occurred:
The Saturday Night Massacre - Oct. 20, 1973
The authorization of the House Judiciary to start an impeachment investigation - February 6, 1974
The US v. Nixon decision -- July 23 1974
The adoption by the Judiciary Committee of three impeachment articles July 27-30 (passed despite opposition from a majority of the Republicans on the Committee)
The release of the smoking gun tape: Aug 5, 1974
Until the release of the smoking gun tape, Nixon's ouster was far from certain given continued republican opposition
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,817 posts)era then, although I did not work for the federal government. We really thought, when Ford became VP, that he'd remain VP, although things did suddenly move quickly not long thereafter.
When the Saturday Night Massacre happened most of us thought, "Oh, crap! Nixon will stay forever."
delisen
(6,042 posts)dramatic events of the Watergate investigation prior to the resignation of Spiro Agnew and the nomination of Gerald ford as vp.
A Harris poll in July 1973 found that 44% believed that Nixon should resign if involved in a criminal coverup of Watergate burglary.
July and August: the country witnessed the subpoena by the Watergate committee of the White House tapes, the special prosecutor demanded same, Nixon refused and turned to the public in a dramatic prime time address explaining his refusal. the committee and the special prosecutor turned to the courts.
It was against this immediate backdrop that Agnew resigned and the Senate told Nixon that Gerald Ford was their choice for vp.
When Ford was nominated and confirmed the discussion of whether or not Nixon would be able to to survive as president had been underway.
https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/museum/exhibits/watergate_files/content.php?section=3&page=d
The Ford Library Museum has a timeline of events
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,817 posts)Keep in mind that it was ten months from Agnew's resignation to Nixon's. The Saturday Night Massacre was just ten days after Agnew resigned, and it was a clear attempt on Nixon's part to keep the entire Watergate investigation from continuing. Fortunately, in the end, it didn't happen that way.
I didn't realize the Senate told Nixon that Ford should be the VP, as it was the House that confirmed him. And the House that would confirm any other replacement VP. Which is why no Democrat will possibly be a replacement VP this year or next.
onetexan
(13,024 posts)Hillary the legitimate president won the popular vote by 3 million. She is not president because the election was stolen by thugs who traded democracy for treason. It would only be justice served and a horrific wrong made right to give the rightful winner her due as POTUS, duly elected by the majority of Americans.
mythology
(9,527 posts)onetexan
(13,024 posts)sarisataka
(18,501 posts)Of "resign your office after designating a specific successor or go to jail"
delisen
(6,042 posts)of a particular successor is up to whomever is designated by law to make those decisions or agreements.
A defendant must make his her deal of own free will, I believe-it can't be forced by others. The prosecutor could not force Agnew to resign, it was up to him to make that decision of his free will.
In the Agnew precedent, neither Agnew or the prosecutors were involved in determining succession. They had no authority in that area.
Gerald Ford was a politically-decided choice by the constitutionally empowered actors.
Justice
(7,185 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,429 posts)adversary to classified information. Pence committed espionage. Thats the simple story. And the true story. He cant assume the presidency.
Abouttime
(675 posts)Trump is toast and likely going to prison for life. Pence is looking to save not just his freedom but his reputation. He could escape prosecution and be the head of the opposition for life by naming Hillary as his VP then resigning. In a strange way he would become the republican version of Jimmy Carter, respected and out of politics. He could lead a permanent minority Republican Party and devote his time to religion.
Hillary would have at least two years as President and be a shoo in for reelection.
sl8
(13,679 posts)ClarendonDem
(720 posts)Or Pence? Trump clearly doesn't care about fairness, and I can't imagine Pence does either. And regardless of how much I don't like the result, Trump won the election under the rules that govern our elections.
delisen
(6,042 posts)why would Trump do that? It is the magic of the pleas bargain tha makes people do out-of-character things.
Much depend on whether someone or someone's relatives are facing charges.
That we don't know for certain how Trump won. But even if Trump's relatives face charges, don't see how Pence's would, which short-circuits this fantasy.
delisen
(6,042 posts)He is connected to Manafort.
If he faces charges he may want to bargain. Spiro Agnew did and decided to plea bargain his way out of the vp slot.
While I dislike the Tea Party Republicans and their politics, and their dishonesty, I do give them credit for going full speed ahead in pursuit of what they want and turning barriers into mere obstacles.
Once Democrats used to to a lot more thinking along those lines-turning barriers into obstacles that could be overcome.
Kaleva
(36,259 posts)delisen
(6,042 posts)sarisataka
(18,501 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)delisen
(6,042 posts)not refuse ourselves the demand that justice be done.
Initech
(100,043 posts)Pence and Ryan would both nominate some ultra far right extremist.
delisen
(6,042 posts)If we don't demand justice, who will? If no one demands justice, will it ever happen?
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)rickford66
(5,522 posts)Elect Clinton Speaker. Impeach Trump and Pence and find them guilty.
onenote
(42,609 posts)We have 46 seats, plus two independents that vote with us. In 2018, 23 of our seats, plus the two independent seats, are up for reelection. There are eight republican seats up. If we capture all 33, we go from 48 to 56 -- that's eleven short of 2/3.
And we're not winning 33 out of 33 elections in 2018, no matter what happens.
rickford66
(5,522 posts)In my opinion, it's possibly the most logical way Clinton could end up President. Of course probable isn't the same as possible. One of the reasons I made the post is that in my political conversations, very few people know that the Speaker can be anyone who meets the criteria of a Representative, not necessarily a Representative. Of course you are correct. It could never happen.
TeamPooka
(24,210 posts)then I have a bridge in Brooklyn you should buy.
We may not get a peaceful transition of power even with an election with this crooked bunch.
Abouttime
(675 posts)10 years ago you would have said we'd never have gay marriage or transsexuals in the military.
Don't be afraid to think big, were on the right side of history.
Trump will be gone and Hillary will be President!!
TeamPooka
(24,210 posts)there is no evolution
Comparing a social rights movement to a crooked regime is not applicable.
and to think Hillary will be president now in this way outlined is just naive foolishness.
the kind that gets you blocked and/or ignored around here by serious folks with work to do electing Democrats.
You are thinking big when you should be thinking smart and realistically.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)During that hockey game on the frozen ice of Hell?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,817 posts)Are you aware that a new VP is confirmed by the House? Do you recall what the balance of power is there?
There is no way on god's green earth that the House would confirm any Democrat whatsoever, let alone Hillary Clinton. They'd go for one of their own, and I'm not about to make any speculation at this point.
Takket
(21,529 posts)Just about as likely.
delisen
(6,042 posts)in the Russian interference or the investigation turns up some financial scam involvement.