General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStuart G
(38,414 posts)Through contributions, through other kinds of influence, and wacky interpretation of the 2nd Amendment
Baconator
(1,459 posts)... who show up and vote on their issue.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Case in point; how many voters would show up to vote to facilitate an opioid crisis? Yet the Congress stripped the DEA of authority to monitor drug distributors which allowed the shipment of 9,000,000 Oxycontin tablets to a pharmacy serving a community of 379 people. There were no nay votes.
Nope, it's not the votes.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)Opensecrets had them at 4 million a year...
That's a drop in the bucket compared to most lobbying organizations.
The reality is that politicians in a significant number of areas in the country know that they will be out on their ass if they cross the line.
Gun rights drive votes...
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)of Republicans favor more gun control. Including a ban on military style assault rifles.
Even more Dems and Independents.
Nope, it's not the gun nut vote, it's the lobby and the year after year after year $$.
But keep celebrating your imagined potency.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)You're right, and people who imagine this is all about gun ownership need to understand:
The issue itself is useful in keeping the electorate divided and turned on itself.
We don't have proper gun control because it would remove that tool of manipulation.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)... And you are willfully, and I suspect intentionally, misrepresenting it.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Baconator
(1,459 posts)flamin lib
(14,559 posts)You even impugned my integrity.
Defend your statements, Sir or Madam. Link to the poll YOU saw that I supposedly misrepresented.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)This the one? Nope
How about this? Nuh uh..
This one? Nyet...
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Yeah, that's what gunners do.
I saw the poll. You said you saw the poll. You said I misrepresented it, probably intentionally, hence I lied.
I accept your refusal to actually show me wrong as proof that 1)I am not a liar and 2)nearly 80% of Republicans in the IPSOS poll support a ban on "assault rifles".
Bye now.
Amishman
(5,554 posts)This was exposed recently after the Vegas shooting.
The NRA came out and made a statement tepidly endorsing the idea of restricting bump stocks.
Their membership went nuts and flooded the NRA with demands that they take it back and for no new gun restrictions of any kind.
The NRA walked it back and redefined their original statement to be the most narrow and toothless interpretation, and stopped talking about it.
There are millions of them and they are far more engaged than any other special interest base. politicians are used to supporters who vaguely like an idea but are too busy with their lives to really push. The gun rights crowd has a massive core of zealots who hammer the issue.
ileus
(15,396 posts)that aren't members but never fail to vote.
Hard to keep power and get reelected if you piss off 70% of your voters....and nothing gets voters motivated like losing their rights.
spanone
(135,795 posts)ChoppinBroccoli
(3,781 posts)If you said, "If a 9/11 attack happened EVERY MONTH, you'd do something to stop it, wouldn't you?" that helps drive home the point. 33,000 dead every year is like having 9/11 happen every single month.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)And then they would go back to watching Faux "News"
Stinky The Clown
(67,762 posts). . . . . for another case of of a CRISIS that remains largely unaddressed in this country.
So yeah. Let's make it harder for a bunch of people to get into the country because ONE CRAZY PERSON committed a horrible crime.
source: https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Response to Stinky The Clown (Reply #7)
flamin lib This message was self-deleted by its author.
Motownman78
(491 posts)is 22,000 of those are suicides.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)try making that point.
ansible
(1,718 posts)Motownman78
(491 posts)suicides into the number of people killed by guns each year makes as much sense as including deaths by hanging and trying to ban rope.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Because the method doesnt cause it.
Look at Japans suicide rate compared to ours and then how accessible guns are.
Saying that suicides with guns are a gun problem or one that is solved by regulating guns is unrealistic.
Its a mental health issue.
If you want to reduce it, you treat and focus on the cause, not the means.
Of course that is true of most violence committed with crime. If we were actually serious about addressing it the focus, effort and spending should be on the underlying cause of the violence, not on one item used in it.
Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)The entirety of the gun control movement can be encompassed in one simple word; lazy. They want what's easiest and laziest rather than addressing actual issues.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)When access to guns is restricted, suicide rates plummet. Other methods are dramatically less effective, resulting in failed attempts and--contrary to what NRA literature insists--many attempted suicides are impulsive, so the person won't simpy "try again."
The NRA and its allies love to pass the buck and dismiss suicide (and gun murders) as "a mental health issue," but that's merely a deflection.
It is a mental health issue. It is also a gun issue. As long as gun advocates pretend that this is not the case, there will be no improvement.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)HAB911
(8,867 posts)sarisataka
(18,497 posts)Gee, I can't argue with that guy!
Marengo
(3,477 posts)The source.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)gunners adamantly opposed to restrictions and actively supporting relaxing of already lax gun laws that will put more guns on the street.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)If the murder of 20 first graders didn't change the narrative then nothing will. Sad but true. Since Newtown, things have only gotten worse.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Though the number of guns has sky-rocketed.
Something is working.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/03/weve-had-a-massive-decline-in-gun-violence-in-the-united-states-heres-why/?utm_term=.4d0ad601d4d2
maxsolomon
(33,251 posts)so that helps.
Kaleva
(36,258 posts)Percentage of the adult population who own 1 or more guns continues to decline
Kaleva
(36,258 posts)Back in 1978, 51% of households had at least one gun. In 2016, it was down to 36%. Fewer people with guns may be a major reason for the decline in the homicide rate.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Kaleva
(36,258 posts)While the percentage of households with at least one gun continues to decline, the actual number of guns owned by civilians has skyrocketed. Does this mean there is a small percentage that own many, many guns? The increase in population since 1978 would account for some of the increase in number of guns even if overall ownership has declined
DFW
(54,302 posts)maxsolomon
(33,251 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:33 PM - Edit history (1)
or is that just the Dotard spouting off?
Baconator
(1,459 posts)Excellent odds he self-radicalized after his arrival.
maxsolomon
(33,251 posts)or was he part of "Chain Migration"?
Baconator
(1,459 posts)He definitely came in on the program and I'm using professional judgment on the guess about radicalization post arrival.
maxsolomon
(33,251 posts)for his "Chain Migration" blathering.
OK, thanks for the info.