Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 06:30 PM Nov 2017

This word, rigging. It does not mean what you think it does.

Did the DNC favor Hillary? - Yes!

But how did they RIG the vote? Did they change votes in the primaries? Caucuses? Prevent Sanders voters from Voting? Hold elections and only tell HRC?



By spreading this "Rigging" lie, we are helping the GOP, who ACTUALLY RIG ELECTIONS

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
2. Here is the rigged part.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 06:35 PM
Nov 2017

In the caucus states (where Bernie did best) the venues were paid for by the Democratic party. So, I guess Hillary's fund raising for the party actually rigged it in Bernie's favor.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
6. I am trying to get accurate terminology
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 06:52 PM
Nov 2017

The DNC did NOT rig it.


THE GOP is rigging elections.


Please do elevate what happened with the DNC with what the GOP did to the election.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
10. It doesn't sound like a 'justification'....just a problem with which adjective is being used...
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 06:56 PM
Nov 2017

because it's the WRONG ONE. Rigged is bullshit pure and simple.

Response to dogman (Reply #7)

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
13. I see nothing unethical about bailing out the Democratic party.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 07:04 PM
Nov 2017

When it was in dire straits with your own fundraising money, as a Democrat.

I think it's unethical to try to sell a book by making these unfounded bullshit allegations that end up with "oh well, I didn't find anything actually to represent rigging."

dogman

(6,073 posts)
14. So buying the Party without the Party's approval is ethical?
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 07:13 PM
Nov 2017

Until we stop selling out, it wont matter to voters. They just figure they are all the same.

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
15. Keeping it on the down low that the party was mismanaged is strategic.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 07:22 PM
Nov 2017

It was in dire straits under Obama and the last thing you do is reveal that you need freaking money in a campaign.

Headlines would be "DNC in shambles! No money! Sad!"

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
9. This is EXACTLY what I said in another one on these Donna threads. Rig is total bullshit.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 06:55 PM
Nov 2017

Unless voting machines were tampered with...nobody rigged nothing.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
12. Most of the time it was that they found
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 07:00 PM
Nov 2017

they did not like the longstanding processes. Had not known what they were and found they didn't like it and counted that as "rigging."

The caucuses were no good and so unfair, yet those states had done it that way for years. Then Bernie won some of them, so that was off the table.

Then the southern states did not deserve to participate because in the GE they would likely go red. All because Bernie wasn't winning them.

Then the superdelegates were so awful and unfair, but later they were prevailed upon to vote for Bernie.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This word, rigging. It ...