Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,863 posts)
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 09:33 PM Nov 2017

I think we should spare a thought for the former military personnel who need

medical attention to deal with PTSD and never get it. There was one who killed several cops and now 26 innocents are dead.
Maybe they should stop destroying young men in their illegal invasions and wars.

You don't get to ditch these young men after you use them in wars - they too need healing.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think we should spare a thought for the former military personnel who need (Original Post) malaise Nov 2017 OP
I haven't seen his bio GP6971 Nov 2017 #1
Sadly, history does not bear you out, malaise. Glorfindel Nov 2017 #2
+1,000 malaise Nov 2017 #4
Early reports of courts martial and dishonorable discharge GusBob Nov 2017 #3
Didn't see that but read he was in the military malaise Nov 2017 #5
Where did you see his photo? I haven't been able to locate one. coolsandy Nov 2017 #7
my google search eleny Nov 2017 #10
Someone posted it on Louis' thread malaise Nov 2017 #12
Per CBS news/ huff post GusBob Nov 2017 #9
Wow! malaise Nov 2017 #11
Following the link provided above GusBob Nov 2017 #15
Yep just read that malaise Nov 2017 #16
Yes, Dishonorable Discharge is considered the same as a Federal Felony conviction Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #22
... spanone Nov 2017 #6
Bush's legacy lives on. :( Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #8
+1,000 malaise Nov 2017 #13
This will haunt the US for decades. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #14
Mental Health is a big issue bdamomma Nov 2017 #17
brain injuries. if they addressed only that mopinko Nov 2017 #19
The vast majority of PTSD sufferers aren't veterans Nevernose Nov 2017 #18
Actually this guy didn't see any combat because he was dishonorably discharged for abusing his malaise Nov 2017 #20
Please quit feeding into the broken/dangerous veteran stereotype Lee-Lee Nov 2017 #21

GP6971

(31,133 posts)
1. I haven't seen his bio
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 09:35 PM
Nov 2017

other then I read somewhere here that he was Air force and was court martialed out.

Need to wait for confirmation though.

Glorfindel

(9,726 posts)
2. Sadly, history does not bear you out, malaise.
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 09:38 PM
Nov 2017

"These young men" are disposable. Always have been, always will be. The message from the government and people of the USA?
"Good night and thank you, whoever. You've completed your task, what more could we ask of you now? Please sign the book on your way out the door, and that will be all. If we need you, we'll call. But I don't think that's likely somehow." (With apologies to lyricist Tim Rice and Lord Andrew Lloyd Weber.)

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
3. Early reports of courts martial and dishonorable discharge
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 09:39 PM
Nov 2017

Might preclude things in this case.

In general, I agree with you tho

malaise

(268,863 posts)
5. Didn't see that but read he was in the military
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 09:42 PM
Nov 2017

If the photo I saw was really him, he clearly is not mentally well.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
9. Per CBS news/ huff post
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 09:49 PM
Nov 2017

It has been discussed in a couple of threads here.

His actual military service is unknown, nor the reason for his court martial and discharge

People are claiming a dishonorable discharge is a felony and you can't own a gun

Don't know if that is true

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
15. Following the link provided above
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 10:01 PM
Nov 2017

He served at an air base in New Mexico. I don't think he saw combat so PTSD may not be an issue in this case

malaise

(268,863 posts)
16. Yep just read that
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 10:04 PM
Nov 2017

He appears to be a gun humper with no cause.

Still there are many young men who need help.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
22. Yes, Dishonorable Discharge is considered the same as a Federal Felony conviction
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 07:10 AM
Nov 2017

It’s one of the questions specifically asked on the 4473 and a disqualification under a NICS check.

I’m betting on straw purchase by the wife/girlfriend. We will probably know fairly soon...

bdamomma

(63,822 posts)
17. Mental Health is a big issue
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 10:12 PM
Nov 2017

and no one is talking about it or doing something about it. But you get these filthy repigs who want to give mentally challenged people the right to buy guns. I know both are separate issues, but mental health issues should not be swept under the rug. Oh by the way, we have dangerous case in the WH.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
18. The vast majority of PTSD sufferers aren't veterans
Sun Nov 5, 2017, 10:25 PM
Nov 2017

Are not military personnel, former or otherwise, and have never seen combat.

Maybe this latest guy saw way more combat than most Air Force veterans (I've got an uncle that actually saw quite a bit of close-and-personal combat in the Air Force in three different wars). Statistically the odds are low.

Totally agree that we fight a lot of illegal invasions and wars, and totally agree that we treat veterans as disposable. The implication that mass shooting is -- in any way, shape, or form -- symptomatic or related in the least to PTSD is, frankly, a little offensive.

malaise

(268,863 posts)
20. Actually this guy didn't see any combat because he was dishonorably discharged for abusing his
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 05:52 AM
Nov 2017

wife and child.
I was not implying that mass shooting is related to PTSD - I gave two examples of recent shootings by ex-military and clearly this Kelley guy had other issues.
That said veterans do not receive the help they need.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
21. Please quit feeding into the broken/dangerous veteran stereotype
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 07:07 AM
Nov 2017

This guy was a cargo handler in the Air Force and was kicked out because he didn’t meet standards.

He doesn’t have PTSD related to military service.

The assumption that because he was vet that must be the cause of this is offense and noting more than a harmful anti-veteran stereotype. Most vets don’t have PTSD and most who do it very rarely manifests itself as making them dangerous to others.

The media, however, immediately runs with the “he was a veteran he probably had PTSD” nonsense as soon as they lean that he served and speculation like that just feeds the fire of this nonsense and leads to more bigotry against veterans.

And the entertainment industry does it too. When is the last time you saw a major character in a movie or TV show that was a vet that wasn’t portrayed as either “broken” or crazy or super “gung-ho”? Can you name any character on a show who was just a well adjusted person who had served?

That stereotyping and bigotry is already everywhere else. We don’t need it here. It just serves to further turn people away from vets and stigmatize those who actually have PTSD.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think we should spare a...