Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How credible is the Daily Beast? (Original Post) .99center Nov 2017 OP
I think the Daily Beast is pretty reliable. comradebillyboy Nov 2017 #1
I think Rachel and Chris Hayes use some of the news they generate. shraby Nov 2017 #2
Spencer Ackerman is extremely reputable. herding cats Nov 2017 #3
I suppose guesses would be cilla4progress Nov 2017 #4
Oh crap. What is it? PearliePoo2 Nov 2017 #5
Today's New York Times main headline is bad enough in that regard. Chiyo-chichi Nov 2017 #20
Why is he waiting for this evening? Whatta schmuck. Not fair! shraby Nov 2017 #6
I think Ackerman has a good rep... regardless, I LOVE this GIF in response: hlthe2b Nov 2017 #7
Suggestions please? What pairs BEST with "disturbing"? PearliePoo2 Nov 2017 #8
hopefully it is worth all of the above. mopinko Nov 2017 #15
Guess we just need to chill out Grammy23 Nov 2017 #9
Sunday night would probably be the optimum night to drop a big story. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2017 #10
That was my thought. Grammy23 Nov 2017 #14
This is probably referencing the NY Times breaking news story this pm about NSA being hacked: wishstar Nov 2017 #11
They are reliable Achilleaze Nov 2017 #12
Same as Newsweek so very credible cally Nov 2017 #13
Right. PDittie Nov 2017 #19
i think it is this mopinko Nov 2017 #16
Here's the story DesertRat Nov 2017 #17
Hit and miss PDittie Nov 2017 #18
Their people appear on MSNBC shows regularly lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #21

herding cats

(19,558 posts)
3. Spencer Ackerman is extremely reputable.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 03:40 PM
Nov 2017

Spencer Ackerman
Spencer Ackerman was the national security editor for Guardian US. Ackerman was part of the Guardian team that won the 2014 Pulitzer prize for public service journalism. A former senior writer for Wired, he won the 2012 National Magazine Award for digital reporting.

https://www.theguardian.com/profile/spencerackerman

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
5. Oh crap. What is it?
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 03:51 PM
Nov 2017

I REALLY, REALLY don't like the words "disturbing" and "national security" in the same sentence. Nope, not a bit.



Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
9. Guess we just need to chill out
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 04:32 PM
Nov 2017

And wait for this story to drop.

Anyone think it might be another bombshell? On a Sunday night? What a way to start the week!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
10. Sunday night would probably be the optimum night to drop a big story.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 04:34 PM
Nov 2017

Last edited Sun Nov 12, 2017, 07:15 PM - Edit history (1)

It will be lead story for the upcoming week.

Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
14. That was my thought.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 06:53 PM
Nov 2017

Drop story Sunday or Sunday p.m. Hit the ground running by Monday a.m. Churn it out all week. tRump will hate it.

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
11. This is probably referencing the NY Times breaking news story this pm about NSA being hacked:
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 05:14 PM
Nov 2017

"Security Breach and Spilled Secrets Have Shaken the N.S.A. to Its Core-
A serial leak of the agency’s cyberweapons has damaged morale, slowed intelligence
operations and resulted in hacking attacks on businesses and civilians worldwide.

Fifteen months into a wide-ranging investigation by the agency’s counterintelligence arm, known as Q Group, and the F.B.I., officials still do not know whether the N.S.A. is the victim of a brilliantly executed hack, with Russia as the most likely perpetrator, an insider’s leak, or both. Three employees have been arrested since 2015 for taking classified files, but there is fear that one or more leakers may still be in place. And there is broad agreement that the damage from the Shadow Brokers already far exceeds the harm to American intelligence done by Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor who fled with four laptops of classified material in 2013.

Mr. Snowden’s cascade of disclosures to journalists and his defiant public stance drew far more media coverage than this new breach. But Mr. Snowden released code words, while the Shadow Brokers have released the actual code; if he shared what might be described as battle plans, they have loosed the weapons themselves. Created at huge expense to American taxpayers, those cyberweapons have now been picked up by hackers from North Korea to Russia and shot back at the United States and its allies."

NY Times breaking news


PDittie

(8,322 posts)
19. Right.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 11:40 AM
Nov 2017
https://www.readingthepictures.org/2017/11/pop-goes-newsweek/



Let’s face it – most of us have seen this week’s Newsweek cover that employs a cartoonish approach to illustrate an incredibly serious and painful scenario playing out around the country. And I am of a certain age to remember a time when Newsweek was an award-winning outlet for powerful news photography. Over the past decade, we have all been forced to bear witness to the slow and painful decline and demise of print publications in the United States. I won’t go into my personal history regarding this trend, but let’s say that it has not been pleasant.


If you like TMZ, you should love Newsweek and the Daily Beast. JS



PDittie

(8,322 posts)
18. Hit and miss
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 11:36 AM
Nov 2017

This Green Beret story is a blockbuster. Their political reporting, especially w/r/t Russia, has been almost laughable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How credible is the Daily...