General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll Work and No Pay: The Great Speedup
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/06/speed-up-american-workers-long-hoursOn a bright spring day in a wisteria-bedecked courtyard full of earnest, if half-drunk, conference attendees, we were commiserating with a fellow journalist about all the jobs we knew of that were going unfilled, being absorbed or handled "on the side." It was tough for all concerned, but necessaryyou know, doing more with less.
"Ah," he said, "the speedup."
His old-school phrase gave form to something we'd been noticing with increasing apprehensionand it extended far beyond journalism. We'd hear from creative professionals in what seemed to be dream jobs who were crumbling under ever-expanding to-do lists; from bus drivers, hospital technicians, construction workers, doctors, and lawyers who shame-facedly whispered that no matter how hard they tried to keep up with the extra hours and extra tasks, they just couldn't hold it together. (And don't even ask about family time.)
Webster's defines speedup as "an employer's demand for accelerated output without increased pay," and it used to be a household word. Bosses would speed up the line to fill a big order, to goose profits, or to punish a restive workforce. Workers recognized it, unions (remember those?) watched for and negotiated over itand, if necessary, walked out over it.
But now we no longer even acknowledge itnot in blue-collar work, not in white-collar or pink-collar work, not in economics texts, and certainly not in the media (except when journalists gripe about the staff-compacted-job-expanded newsroom). Now the word we use is "productivity," a term insidious in both its usage and creep. The not-so-subtle implication is always: Don't you want to be a productive member of society? Pundits across the political spectrum revel in the fact that US productivity (a.k.a. economic output per hour worked) consistently leads the world. Yes, year after year, Americans wring even more value out of each minute on the job than we did the year before. U-S-A! U-S-A!
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)it has been going on for a significant time under the charming moniker of "doing more with less." Less what? Less hours, less labor and less people.
I have watched hours cut again and again in my workplace and it's everywhere no matter to whom you speak.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)of the American worker", ALWAYS remember that this means one man doing the job of two for no more pay.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)comes an awful crash.
wakemewhenitsover
(1,595 posts)...to define the growing phenomenon of more work, same pay. Given Republicans' penchant for deceptive language, I have to wonder if incessant usage of the word "productivity" is yet another of Republicans' many planned branding schemes.
The Random House Dictionary gives 1920-1925 as the time of origin of the term "speedup". Perhaps the term became less commonly used as unions gained strength and the speedup phenomenon subsided. Well, the speedup is back, and I think it is important to inject a word into the discussion to counter the "productivity" meme.
To me, speedup sounds too friendly for what it describes; I think "overloading" is more appropriate. Either way, this article calls attention to a phenomenon that should be shouted from the rooftops until it becomes part of the national discussion.
Make sure to read the entire article and see the additional charts: fantastic, powerful stuff!
Thanks for posting, xchrom! (Can't find the "You rock!" emoticon, so I'll give you one of these , one of these , and one of these !)
xchrom
(108,903 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)I work in two departments in UC Berkeley mostly processing travel reimbursements and other types of reimbursements. A couple of years ago the administrations of all the Research Departments were shut down and the work was consolidated under one department. All the staff were laid off and the Research Services Enterprise hired back a few to do the work each department's old staff used to do. It used to be that over 65 departments had their own staff to do the work. Now 6 people where I work do the same work for the 65 departments. It is brutal. The work never ends and it never slows down or has a down time. They also pay me less than the 1 unit does. Go figure.
The other department I work for is academic. So I go from working for 65 units to working for 1 unit every day. I'm constantly reminded of the difference. Now they're talking about doing the same sort of thing in the academic departments.
I'm one of the lucky ones. I got laid off, but I was rehired because of my experience and knowledge of UC Policy. I'm one of those people who has 'institutional memory' and we're becoming a dying breed. Yet at least on a weekly basis people come to me for information about something regarding UC Policy. And that includes managers and supervisors I work under.
edited to correct the number of departments.
edited for the same reason
wakemewhenitsover
(1,595 posts)...a stronghold of liberal thought and action, such exploitation is a damned shame.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)We already had a 15 million dollar cutback a couple of years ago, and we're having another similar cut this year. We went through furloughs under Schwartzenneger as well as hiring freezes. Now with Jerry Brown we're getting more of the same. It can't be helped, but if we ever see a bounce back to any normalcy the jobs landscape is going to look very different.
wakemewhenitsover
(1,595 posts)Bragi
(7,650 posts)In the dark world of DU3, all we get now is kick.
So be it!
lunatica
(53,410 posts)You can recommend, but you can't unrecommend, unless you unrecommend your own recommend.
Bragi
(7,650 posts)WingDinger
(3,690 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Great article.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)I'm sick of having to go through a 10 minute phone menu to get a simple question answered, of self-service everything.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)Your life today.
From insurance to phone plans to who knows what else.