Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If we had passed this simple law none of this would have happened. (Original Post) shockey80 Nov 2017 OP
Would he have just submitted false documents? He is a con man and liar. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #1
yes edhopper Nov 2017 #2
The laws mean nothing to Trump, he always finds a workaround. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #3
That is because edhopper Nov 2017 #17
They knew the emails were nothing, and Benghazi was a CIA op gone wrong. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #18
yep edhopper Nov 2017 #19
The he would've been disqualified from the start. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #6
Good point. Here's a revision. Jim Lane Nov 2017 #12
Yes, perfect. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #14
Or the law could be that you submit to allowing the IRS releasing your returns directly OnDoutside Nov 2017 #15
Yes. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #16
Yep. dalton99a Nov 2017 #4
I agree! Also it was dumb of the GOP to have so many Presidential candidates. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #5
How were they supposed to stop it? Jim Lane Nov 2017 #13
When we finally get rid of Trump one way or the other a lot of laws need to be changed blueinredohio Nov 2017 #7
I believe that each state can determine how candidates can get on their ballot Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #8
It would have been called "corrupt" by those candidates ehrnst Nov 2017 #9
A bill passed by the California State assembly will require presidential candidates to release their lutherj Nov 2017 #10
better law would have been bluestarone Nov 2017 #11
I hope such a law is passed before the next POTUS election lunamagica Nov 2017 #20
Who would be signing said bill? Gabi Hayes Nov 2017 #21

Irish_Dem

(46,946 posts)
18. They knew the emails were nothing, and Benghazi was a CIA op gone wrong.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 06:55 PM
Nov 2017

They knew she couldn't talk about the CIA situation.
So they just did gang bang Kabuki theater.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
12. Good point. Here's a revision.
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 05:23 PM
Nov 2017

Instead of "candidate must release returns," the law could say that "candidate must publicly authorize IRS to release returns to public and news media." Then anyone could get the returns directly from the IRS, possibly on paying photocopying fee if they're not electronically available.

OnDoutside

(19,954 posts)
15. Or the law could be that you submit to allowing the IRS releasing your returns directly
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 06:09 PM
Nov 2017

to the public. That would get around false returns being shown.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
13. How were they supposed to stop it?
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 05:27 PM
Nov 2017

There seems to be this idea that the party's national committee wields total control over the nominating process. I see it here when people post hopes or predictions that the DNC will bar Bernie from running in 2020.

The DNC didn't have the power to bar Bernie, and the RNC didn't have the power to bar Pataki and all the other extreme-longshot candidates who swelled the field to 17. They just had to let the process sort them out.

blueinredohio

(6,797 posts)
7. When we finally get rid of Trump one way or the other a lot of laws need to be changed
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 12:58 PM
Nov 2017

to run for president

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
8. I believe that each state can determine how candidates can get on their ballot
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 01:33 PM
Nov 2017

A state could pass a law stating a candidate has to supply 5-10 years of tax returns
easier than trying to get it through congress

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
9. It would have been called "corrupt" by those candidates
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 02:57 PM
Nov 2017

who refuse to release their tax returns, because it would have been a hurdle for those candidates.

lutherj

(2,496 posts)
10. A bill passed by the California State assembly will require presidential candidates to release their
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 03:13 PM
Nov 2017

tax returns. It still needs to be passed by the state senate, but that seems likely. A similar bill has been introduced in New York.

http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/350789-california-legislature-passes-bill-requiring-presidential-candidates-to

bluestarone

(16,914 posts)
11. better law would have been
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 03:16 PM
Nov 2017

you have a mental capability of a four year old. THAT I KNOW HE WOULDN'T PASS

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
20. I hope such a law is passed before the next POTUS election
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 02:53 AM
Nov 2017

ALL candidates MUST show their tax returns before running

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
21. Who would be signing said bill?
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 03:09 AM
Nov 2017

No way to override the veto, unless pugs were so fed up with him they’d play ball, which seems unlikely

He’s doing everything they want, to destroy any semblance of a government which serves the people, instead of their corporate masters

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If we had passed this sim...