General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat has DU come to we have numerous posts condeming a Democratic Senator for
a comedy routine while entertaining in a combat zone. But we have a president that brags about assaulting women,. We have the Congress plotting to raid our country and give $1.5 trillion to billionaires and not one post about either.
Kingofalldems
(38,422 posts)doc03
(35,295 posts)FakeNoose
(32,579 posts)I've sen lots of troll posts here in the past few days, trying to stir up trouble.
Just remember - anybody who comes on DU and demands that Al Franken resign is a troublemaker. They should forfeit their DU membership. They don't belong here. We stick together and fight for what's right.
MFM008
(19,803 posts).....
Paladin
(28,243 posts)trueblue2007
(17,193 posts)don't let the troll people lie about our democrats and say mean things.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)for me usually...has to be really really bad.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)oasis
(49,327 posts)joshdawg
(2,646 posts)but according to right-wingers IOKIYAR.
Anything goes.
Democrats play by the rules, but republicans make up rules as they go along. Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Today's republican party should be outlawed. Lock'em all up!
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Because the GOP has no moral standing - their only goal is to enrich their donors at all costs.
Link to tweet
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)I think he is an ally - but he did act like a dick. He has recognised that and apologised, that should be an end to it. However, as a newbie to this site I have concerns about calling for people to be banned if they do not agree with you and how you think the fight should be fought? For some a call for him to resign is the right call. Why would that make them a troll?
airmid
(500 posts)And willingness to fight for what is right. We need him there, fighting for all of us.
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)Count me among those who fiercely want him to stay and fight. I will note, and promptly dismiss the demands for his resignation, knowing they fall on a continuum from Russian trolls (the enemy) to liberal Democratic purists (misguided, yet well-intentioned allies). With everything thats going on, it seems silly to expend so much energy on outrage.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)not...a skit with a kiss...the whataboutism shows a hatred of Democrats from surprising sources.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)or RWNJs...
And the Dem pols calling for Sen Franken's resignation are weak, spineless, easily-spooked Dems who will throw us ALL under the bus at the first sign of trouble.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)hate Democrats. You can always tell who they are . They pounce with great glee on any negative story about a Democrat or the party and long for that pure mythical third party( It is a two party system people -hello)...why they are here is beyond me.
SJMULE
(193 posts)By DU administrators for a calling out a troll who was calling for Franken's head. Funny ( not really) that a troll will get me banned, because I apparently insulted said TROLL
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Franken needs to stay put and ride this out. The trolls will get bored soon enough and find something else to move on to.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)if we didn't condemn him.
Franken is the most outspoken member of the Senate. It's no wonder this campaign has been mounted against him.
A big story was created around that stupid picture of Franken.
Wiseman32218
(291 posts)ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)Not to mention the way he nailed J. Beauregard Sessions.
global1
(25,224 posts)the posts you indicate that are negative to a Dem Senator might be DU infiltrators trying to divide us even more.
I could envision somebody paying people to put up these negative posts here to try and sway opinion. Could they be fake posts?
Kingofalldems
(38,422 posts)appleannie1943
(1,303 posts)I agree the picture was originally in poor taste but it does not even begin to reach the level of assault.
I also think she was in on the whole thing. Why else would she have on a flak jacket? And if you really look closely, the tips of his fingers are not even touching the flak jacket.
FakeNoose
(32,579 posts)Why do you think Franken has called for an investigation of himself? He's no dummy.
The whole thing is a setup, and I'll bet that woman was paid a lot.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,075 posts)... ( I wanted to be original). I am tempted to block most of those I have seen ignoring the context of the issue. Would I be rude? Would I be tossing a couple of babies out with the bath water? I think to much...
Irish_Dem
(46,500 posts)but hopefully in a fair way.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)is stupid. How about we deal with Trump and not fall for the Franken set up.
nolabear
(41,932 posts)As is everyone else. I have my feelings and opinions but I think there's danger in thinking what's going on here or anywhere in this moment is all there is. Personally I think he did screw up and he's now stepping up.
We have to work on it as though we can use what's going on in all quarters now as fuel to make things better. I like what Al Franken's doing. I like what Hillary's doing. They're not hysterical. They're not belligerent. They are warriors who know who they are and that they're imperfect beings.
We all have chickens. We're fools if we think we don't. It's what you do when they come home that tells me what to think of you. 45 and Moore and Weinstein and Cosby and Weiner and ilk have shown me what they are. So has Al Franken. Unless he surprises the hell out of me
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)JI7
(89,240 posts)Most of their du posts is attacking democrats and defending republicans.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)more than Republicans many times.
In the end, it's the Internet equivalent of talking politics at Thanksgiving.
B2G
(9,766 posts)And the way he is handling this without dragging Tweeden through the mud.
If we all approached it like that, there would be far less consternation in here.
IMO.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)that but inevitably every single time if there's something 'shady' in someone's background it's going to be used for fodder. Look at the woman w/ Moore...bringing up her marriages and bankruptcies.
Do you consider me pointing out her affiliation with Fox and Hannity as dragging through the mud..because I consider that an essential point. Also she's a BIRTHER....she is dragging herself through the mud on that one.
B2G
(9,766 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,851 posts)Is relevant because that goes to credibility. No rational person would believe in birtherism and there is malice involved in pushing that theory. The Hannity thing? Relevant to the extent that she showed him pictures years ago and shows that she might have wanted to hurt him politically. Does it negate the fact that she is humiliated/ angry? Not totally.
BannonsLiver
(16,294 posts)Tweeden must not be questioned or doubted under any circumstances. Every word out of her mouth is a nugget of righteous truth. Thats the case that poster has been trying to make since it broke.
B2G
(9,766 posts)You are flat out wrong.
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)She was doing a skit...and has now lied through her teeth in my view. I won't attack Democrats on the word of a rightie liar...especially when evidence shows she is lying.
OnDoutside
(19,948 posts)womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)He is handling it with dignity and listening to someone who wants to be heard the way we would hope any GOP member would. If they have low standards for the behavior of their politicians, that's their own problem. I am seeing that Al Franken is holding himself to a higher standard and I appreciate it.
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)like minded. I just think we should try to respect each others opinions even if we disagree. We do have to remember that the bottom line is WE ARE ALL for the same thing and on the same 'side' at the end of the day. With that being said...unless some bombs drop on Al about more women - he ain't going nowhere. This is perfect actually to bring up trashbags victims...time to play some of our own whataboutism. WHAT ABOUT DONALD TRUMP.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)I am here...support Democrats...not you just in general.
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)come to, indeed.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)to do this, and I am not saying you are...then you and I are here for different reasons. I support Democrats...in case you haven't noticed, the GOP is doing some awful shit at the moment, and I have no patience for those who whine about Democrats...not saying you whine...just a general comment. And this is so obviously a right wing hit job, I am shocked that any person could fall for it. There are those that want to attack Democrats any seize any opportunity to do so. It is hard to understand their motivations when the only party that can stop Trump and the evil Republicans is the Democratic Party.
SJMULE
(193 posts)are cautious and intelligent. He had to know he would be a target. That his sophomoric actions during what appears to be a bawdy USO trip abroad where Tweeden grabbed as much ass and made out with strangers, could come back to haunt him. He is a media saavy gentleman adult comedian. He knew he did nothing wrong. Anyone who doesn't stand by AL should get off the bus and walk, we do not want you. Signed "Pragmatic Democrats"
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)This is not sexual harassment and it sure as hell isn't sexual assault...this woman just signed a book deal and is cozy with Hannity...add to that ...Stone announced it before it happened...not believable. In my ill-spent youth, I remember a strip poker game that would be very embarrassing if there were pictures. We have a president who assaulted women and yet the right elected him ...his wife has nude pictures posted...please spare me the faux outrage over a few folks having fun on a USO tour. And Ms. Tweedon will not enjoy testifying to congress either...lying is against the law and that is all she has.
orangecrush
(19,409 posts)It worked temporarily, but will not divide us.
LAS14
(13,769 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)Just to name a few:
Kristen Gillibrand.
Bernie Sanders (I)
Kamala Harris.
Corey Booker.
Joe Manchin.
Dianne Feinstein.
Joe Manchin.
Elizabeth Warren.
This Franken stuff isn't new. Hell, this post isn't new. It's the DU Cycle.
Something happens -> DU splits -> People get called trolls/russian bots -> What about Trump. -> We move on.
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)getagrip_already
(14,618 posts)Some of the most obnoxious anti- and pro- voices are just trolls trying to set us against each other. They are on a lot of the political sites and even some hobby sites with political forums.
Only way to explain it.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Which I would think every DU-er would not hesitate to condemn from anyone.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Response to USALiberal (Reply #29)
Post removed
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Response to USALiberal (Reply #56)
Post removed
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)I have averaged more posts per month in the year I have been here than you have in your 7 years here.
Nice try.
I get it, everyone is a troll who disagrees with you.
paleotn
(17,881 posts)and that still doesn't let you off the hook. Other than my original response to your mountain building from mole hills, when did I call someone names or bully? Give....me....one.....example. Go ahead.... Just one....
Waiting......
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)paleotn
(17,881 posts)Still waiting for the example of where I've called others names or bullied. Other than you, Ivan. Or is it Anatoly? Boris maybe?
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Hannity knew, and Stone knew in advance....the other pictures show laughing and goofing around...she is a righty... too. Witnesses says she is not telling the truth. You have to WANT to believe it and that goes to motivation
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)and childish and wrong.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)testify. There was a kiss during the show...and maybe in rehearsal. I think she is a liar.
paleotn
(17,881 posts)...but he's admitted it, apologized and called for an investigation of himself. We all screw up...some screw ups being worse than others, but how one handles those screw ups is a measure of character and Franken has boat loads of that.
Continuing to stir the shit in order to cause discord is one of the primary signs of a troll and it appears to me, your primary purpose on this thread is shit stirring. Now you do the math.
stonecutter357
(12,693 posts)paleotn
(17,881 posts)for some instance where I've called names or bullied...other than you, here's something from someone I admire for you to chew on. She sums up this whole issue quite well I think....so maybe you should stop stirring the shit.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/hillary-clinton-defends-al-franken-after-assault-accusation/
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)paleotn
(17,881 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)brush
(53,742 posts)just accepting what either says is gospel?
I mean she did submit a photo as evidence of his sexual abuse that show him hamming it up for the camera in poor taste but does not show his hands touching her.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)paleotn
(17,881 posts)The Wizard
(12,536 posts)In the kiss picture her arms are around him. It doesn't look like she's struggling to get away.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)This is a put up job by the GOP.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)since it was in the skit. It's the same skit he had done many times before.
I keep trashing the Franken threads, but three more spring up in their place... sigh.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Reading comprehension much???
Response to Thor_MN (Reply #39)
Post removed
moriah
(8,311 posts)... the way the Republicans ignore allegations about theirs?
I'd much rather see liberals not being hypocrites and giving her a fair hearing, and then making any condemnation they feel appropriate.
And for me, essentially after every dramatic thing said and Franken's response, my condemnation is this:
"Al Franken, you were an immature juvenile asshat to take that photo. But thanks for owning up to it and submitting to an investigation. By doing so you're keeping this accusation from in any way preventing Beverly Young Nelson's testiimony request against Roy Moore, who is an asshat accused of forcing immature juveniles to submit to him."
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)Is there a list posted here somewhere? I see posts here criticizing Pelosi, Harris, Booker and many other Dems on a daily basis. I don't see "what have we come to" posts in those cases.
So please, spell it out. I criticize Al Franken for that dumbass photo (comedy stunt notwithstanding) because a) it's crude, boorish and inappropriate - oh and not funny and b) he was considering a Senate run at the time and is a smarter guy than that. The kiss part I'm more skeptical about.
I applaud him for his response. It is the right way to handle the situation. Plus, it draws a very clear line between how we respond to issues of inappropriate behavior and how they respond to a pedophile in their camp, and their sexual abuser president.
Does that make me a long- time troll? I've been here since 2002.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)next to their name...you happy living under Trump watching him kill babies and starve folks? ChIP is gone and now they come for the ACA and medicaid . ..soon it will be medicare and social security. Why would you waste your time criticizing your own especially for put up jobs like Franken's situation...you do the work of the GOP when you do this...not you in particular. but you in general...and if you feel such dislike for your elected why are you a Democrat?
Please link to where you asked the many posters who constantly criticize Nancy Pelosi and other Dems such a question. I won't hold my breath.
This is the most hyperbolic nonsense I've read here and that's saying something. I criticize Franken but applaud his response so that means I'm happy Trump is killing babies and starving people? Really?
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)I'm a bit at the implication I'm a Russian troll because I criticized Franken. But people completely trash Pelosi and other Dems here all The time, and encourage a primary challenge of them.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)The GOP has no standards other than fealty to money.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)is outrageous...obviously a GOP ploy...you have to want to pile on Democrats to fall for it.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)The Mueller investigation is the real story.
When GOP Congressman David Vitter was exposed as a frequent customer of the DC madam, he did not resign, and he was re-elected.
Trump, Vitter, and Gingrich are all the examples we need to show the outrageous double standard.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)summer_in_TX
(2,710 posts)in the slightest to me. Admittedly I did read some posts yesterday that were not constructive, IMO. Hard to sort out the trolls from those whose anger levels have pushed them past the point of being able to carry on a nuanced, reasonable discussion.
This litmus test stuff is repugnant, demeaning, and comes across a lot more like a Republican attitude than that of a Dem.
Lines in the sand. "You're with us or against us." Brother!
Too often I read the threads and just despair that we are going to be able to come together and win. But others give me hope.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)not. This an obvious GOP ploy(Hannity)...and those who breathlessly pile on, do the heavy lifting for the GOP. A person has to want to believe ill of Democrats to believe this stuff...clearly a pack of lies orchestrated by Stone, Hannity and who knows?
summer_in_TX
(2,710 posts)That does us an injustice.
What all of us know now is not what some initially thought they knew. Probably some were gullible and spoke without the benefit of the input of the group. But we bring them along, educating not attacking them.
We are weakened not strengthened when we don't give our mostly likeminded fellow DUers the benefit of the doubt. The harsh and adamant tones used all too often in threads is not conducive to strong bonds or working together for common cause. Nor does it allows the newer people to grow into a broader view. It is likely it just drives them away.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)on any perceived wrongdoing by a Democrat and yet, indifferent to the trespasses of Republicans. I have to wonder if they are Democrats or perhaps third party folks...or even Republicans trolling.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)talk to me about 'constructive' criticism. there is no such thing...and constant criticism on the right and within our own party particularly (and some so called progressive groups like the Greens and our revolution) have driven voters away from the Democratic party...the only party that can stop Trump and the Republicans. We are fighting to keep progressive policy attained years before by smarter folks who understood party loyalty ...and not advancing our progressive agenda.
wolfie001
(2,201 posts)I accept his heartfelt apology and I'm 100% supportive of Al and his legislative agenda.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)but it hurts our credibility when we are so forgiving when the accused is a (D).
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)wolfie001
(2,201 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)they will catch her.
wolfie001
(2,201 posts)The more you peel the layers, the more you find out she was slapping asses and making passes! She voted for GWB twice so Al should've has his guard up. Completely forgivable!
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)We can condemn one of ours even with greater perils from the GOP.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)The Repugs are loving the piling on.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Yes Roy Moore and Drumphenfukkker have done much worse than anything Senator Franken has been accused of doing. But, the upset is not surrounding a comedy routine, but the accusation that Franken french-kissed a woman without her consent, which, if it did happen, is pretty bad. I myself am pretty suspicious these accusations are a hoax considering all that has come out (roger stone knew about it before hand, the accuser is a trump supporter, infowars etc) but the photo is not the main concern.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)and both Hannity and other righties knew about this in advance...you want to be lead around by the nose by the right wing and attack our own at their behest...do it...I won't join in.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Sean Hannity put her up to this
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Heather MC
(8,084 posts)go to youtube she spent a lot of time on the Sean Hannity Show over the years.
Just look at the timing Sean Hannity turned on Roy Moore and said he had 24 hours to come clean or whatever. Steve Bannon call Sean Hannity and tells him to lay off Roy Moore. A day later this woman comes out claiming Al Franken was inappropriate with her.
She mentions that she has a radio show but what she doesn't mention is that she's a regular Fox News contributor on Sean Hannity coincidence I think not. Furthermore the photographer of the photo says that she was fake sleeping actually she was playing dead and Al Franken was supposed to be resuscitating her and she was in on the joke.
Also the military escort that was assigned to escort her said that none of this ever happened. and I firmly believe the reason why Senator Franken called for an investigation is because he knows the truth will come out.
And I don't think Sean Hannity and Roy Moore counted on Al Franken having so much Integrity that he would call for a senate Congressional hearing on himself. This whole thing is about to backfire on all of them
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)Just breaking the subject a bit... In 1969 Danish band The Savage Rose played at the Newport Jazz Festival, which could have been the beginning of a big international career, but since the group would not play for the U.S. troops in Vietnam, the record label would not sign them. The became friends with The Black Panthers, and later the group traveled to the war-torn Lebanon, and played in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, and at the partisan bases in the mountains. The main singer is still performing with local commercial success, and are always playing free at demonstrations.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Too many posts of circular firing squads,
stirring the pot,
and fighting the Democratic 'family feud'.
Trying to rip us apart before the 2018 and 2020 elections.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)to get much past a 2-figure post tally? Don't they usually get weeded out well before that?
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Skittles
(153,113 posts)we call them "fly-under-the-radar" trolls
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)So... (and the last thing I want to do is start another Bernie's not a Democrat, bru-ha) my preference for an alternative over the "chosen" was really a not-so-sly attempt at subversion? It just seems that the troll definition starts flashing if a lemming bucks the crowd and runs away from the cliff. I mean... these camo-dressed trolls must be pretty slick to evade detection and not get ejected from DU. Doesn't that seem crafty? As I noted before, I can see a subversive maybe making it to 60 - 70 - 80-some posts before the whistle gets tweeted. But I'm to believe that there's some who've gotten to five figures with maybe a few alerted messages for not practicing (D) or die? That's amazing to me. So having a difference of opinion is akin to spreading the rumor that the Kool-Ade is spiked?
BTW, save your keystrokes. I've been around here 10 years now. I already have the retort and belittlement memorized. Maybe I'm so under-the-radar that even I don't recognize me! Maybe I should have devised a user name like Con-troll. Damned independent thinking. Lemmee tell you - thinking for yourself is really a curse. Avoid it if you can. Titles like rebel, troublemaker, instigator, troll - you'll have those tattooed all over yourself.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)everytime. This is Democratic Underground...not some right wing hell hole.
samnsara
(17,605 posts)fax to their state congress. I sent one to our GOP Rep and told him to JUSTIFY his vote! #JustifyIt!
Podkayne K
(145 posts)This entire SCAM-DLE feels like a blast from the Lee Atwater/Roger Ailes past. this time manufactured by Stone and Hannity. There are enough holes in this woman's story that even the Cleveland Browns could run through them. My guess is that since Senator Franken didn't want to come off like a member of the G reedy O le' P edofile Party, he correctly called for an inquiry because he knows that once all the facts come out, it will show that nothing much--except the photo, which it appears she obviously agreed to--really happened and what did, was fully agreed to by all participants.
As to those "alleged Democrats" going after Franken: Isn't this the same scenario that was and is still being used against HRC? Friends of P-resident Evil: the Russians, The Mob, and the White Supremacists, who stand to gain a lot going after a prominent, powerful progressive, Jewish Senator.
GaryCnf
(1,399 posts)There are a handful of attacks on Franken but more well-founded attacks on the various misogynistic defenses being unnecessarily raised on his behalf.
Al Franken issued perhaps the most appropriate, not to mention politically brilliant, apology for the only credible (at this point - and I have a feeling at any point) allegation against him -- staging and participating in the photo we've all seen. Certain DUers jumped in with a Carville-esque barrage of misogynistic garbage about her appearing in Playboy etc., a Republican-lite "she's a liar because she's a Republican" crap that the women who had the courage to come forward about that trash rapist Moore have had to endure and/or an Alex Jones level conspiracy theory about fake photos..
Al Franken is a genius. Both those saying "he should resign" and those who feel compelled to make us look like fools by not letting Franken handle it need to read what he said.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)posted ...here she kisses others (nothing wrong with that )...lots of laughter...I will say it again she is a God damned liar and a right wing plant.
GaryCnf
(1,399 posts)Made that point 1000 times more effectively than you just did.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)remembered it differently...a polite way to say she is lying.
GaryCnf
(1,399 posts)It should be the end of it.
I mentioned somewhere else that with every accusation of sexual harassment (or worse), the accusation should be evaluated to determine whether it is credible in light of the surrounding circumstances, just like any other accusation. That goes whether the accused is someone we justifiably despise or someone we justifiably like. Apart from the tiny matter of "How in the f'ing world does anyone in there right mind come up with an "equivalency" between Moore and Al" (yes, that crap drives me nuts too), the statements of the courageous women who came forward to expose (pun intended) Roy Moore have indicia of reliability too numerous to list while anything claimed by Franken's accuser beyond "that was me in the photo" does not. Franken's apology brilliantly made that point.
The point I've been trying to make during our discussion is that, when looking at matters which detract from the credibility of anything past "that was me in the photo," slut-shaming like "she dry humped the guitarist," or "she posed in Playboy," or something that is already being thrown in our faces like "she's a not in my political party," should not be among them.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)Thanks.
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,371 posts)she participated in?
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . is said to have been confirmed by the photographer, Snopes has debunked that:
https://www.snopes.com/photographer-said-franken-image-was-staged/
NoMoreRepugs
(9,371 posts)Perhaps staged is the wrong term, maybe grossly embellished?
SJMULE
(193 posts)It does not mean the photo wasnt staged. I can see the trolls not comprehending Snopes calling the comment fake versus the photo being staged....
infidel621
(36 posts)My old account is gone so please bear with this new account. I have been gone a long time and periodically check the forums but felt the need for clarification and thought to go ahead and brave the report hammer for disagreeing with something.
Ok, President and Congress debacles aside, what is the problem with condemning a Democratic Senator or anyone else if 'the shoe fits'? This is not a condemnation, in fact I have tons of respect for the way Al Franken has handled this. He admitted, apologized to the woman, sent a personal letter, and encouraged an investigation into this because her voice deserves to be heard. I liked him before but this is the way everyone should be. You make a mistake or bad joke, you apologize and own up to it rather than ignore, blame, or deny it which the Republicans have obviously been doing.
This is where I may be missing something, and I did not read every comment so I apologize if I missed this already being mentioned. It sounds as though the OP is suggesting that because it's a Dem Senator that we should not hold them to the same standard? This is a Republican move and smacks of the hypocrisy I can't stand from either side. I don't think he should resign, the woman accepted his apology, if it's good enough for her it's good enough for me. I can't be offended for her if she isn't offended and make my feelings and demands more important.
ariadne0614
(1,703 posts)You covered it very well. Thank you.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)and appropriate as rape jokes. IOW: not at all.
It sickens me to see that photo, which he himself has renounced, to his everlasting credit, defended here.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)The two types are on a continuum:
silly sexist comedy routines----------------------------------------------------rape jokes
They're related. They co-exist. They are BOTH inappropriate.
Response to doc03 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)MFM008
(19,803 posts)To erode the moral authority of an effective senator that aggitates them.
To keep him quiet.
thegoose
(3,115 posts)Of the saboteurs who put out this hit job. We should unite and stay strong. The whole thing has already been debunked. She's a right-wing shill.
Nitram
(22,765 posts)wait before condemning either party before we have more information. The information is now coming out that Franken was part of a raunchy show for the troops that Leeanne was fine with at the time. Same with Roy Moore. When the number of credible witnesses who support the story reach the level we've seen in Moore's case, it's time to take it very seriously and launch a formal investigation. I guess I'm saying people on both sides immediately pile on without really knowing much about the incident being reported.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)brooklynite
(94,337 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)ethics review.