Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Republican war on us. Taxes and court packing.
Everyone knows about the tax heist working it's way toward a Senate vote and many know it will screw 99% of us for the foreseeable future.
But Trump and the Republicans are also packing the courts with unqualified, wingnut people, who will be federal judges for decades to come. Many have been pronounced "Unfit" by the American Bar Association.
Forget the country you grew up in. The Republican court-packing plot will screw America forever:
Conservatives have a new court-packing plan, and in the spirit of the holiday, its a turducken of a scheme: a regulatory rollback hidden inside a civil rights reversal stuffed into a Trumpification of the courts. If conservatives get their way, President Trump will add twice as many lifetime members to the federal judiciary in the next 12 months (650) as Barack Obama named in eight years (325). American law will never be the same.
The outer turkey in the plan is the ongoing Trumpification of the courts. In the final two years of Obamas presidency, Senate Republicans engaged in tenacious obstruction to leave as many judicial vacancies unfilled as possible. The Garland-to-Gorsuch Supreme Court switch is the most visible example of this tactic but far from the only one: Due to GOP obstruction, the number of [judicial] vacancies . . . on the table when [Trump] was sworn in was unprecedented, White House Counsel Donald McGahn recently boasted to the conservative Federalist Society.
Trump is wasting no time in filling the 103 judicial vacancies he inherited. In the first nine months of Obamas tenure, he nominated 20 judges to the federal trial and appellate courts; in Trumps first nine months, he named 58. Senate Republicans are racing these nominees through confirmation; last week, breaking a 100-year-old tradition, they eliminated the blue slip rule that allowed home-state senators to object to particularly problematic nominees. The rush to Trumpify the judiciary includes nominees rated unqualified by the American Bar Association, nominees with outrageously conservative views and nominees significantly younger (and, therefore, likely to serve longer) than those of previous presidents. As a result, by sometime next year, 1 in 8 cases filed in federal court will be heard by a judge picked by Trump. Many of these judges will likely still be serving in 2050.
The outer turkey in the plan is the ongoing Trumpification of the courts. In the final two years of Obamas presidency, Senate Republicans engaged in tenacious obstruction to leave as many judicial vacancies unfilled as possible. The Garland-to-Gorsuch Supreme Court switch is the most visible example of this tactic but far from the only one: Due to GOP obstruction, the number of [judicial] vacancies . . . on the table when [Trump] was sworn in was unprecedented, White House Counsel Donald McGahn recently boasted to the conservative Federalist Society.
Trump is wasting no time in filling the 103 judicial vacancies he inherited. In the first nine months of Obamas tenure, he nominated 20 judges to the federal trial and appellate courts; in Trumps first nine months, he named 58. Senate Republicans are racing these nominees through confirmation; last week, breaking a 100-year-old tradition, they eliminated the blue slip rule that allowed home-state senators to object to particularly problematic nominees. The rush to Trumpify the judiciary includes nominees rated unqualified by the American Bar Association, nominees with outrageously conservative views and nominees significantly younger (and, therefore, likely to serve longer) than those of previous presidents. As a result, by sometime next year, 1 in 8 cases filed in federal court will be heard by a judge picked by Trump. Many of these judges will likely still be serving in 2050.
snip
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/conservatives-have-a-breathtaking-plan-for-trump-to-pack-the-courts/2017/11/21/b7ce90d4-ce43-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html?utm_term=.4b2fcd6ec316
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 584 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Republican war on us. Taxes and court packing. (Original Post)
Cyrano
Nov 2017
OP
As Turtle McConnell has said, "winners make policy, losers go home". We need to keep that in
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2017
#1
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)1. As Turtle McConnell has said, "winners make policy, losers go home". We need to keep that in
mind as the GOP launch their attacks on Democrats in both House and Senate.
vi5
(13,305 posts)2. It's amazing how much a political party can get done without 60 votes.
But hey, at least Democrats respected tradition, "reached across the aisle", and were civil during Obama's first 2 years. So we've got that going for us.....which is nice.