Murdoch to Staff: Influence the Election
Source: RawStory/The Independent
Rupert Murdoch allegedly told his journalists they needed to work harder at stopping the Labour Party from winning England's election, and warned if they didn't the company would fail. According to sources speaking to The Independent, the newspaper mogul said that a Labour government would break up News Corp. when he visited the offices in February. Two days later, The Sun published a two-page spread that supported David Cameron and attacked a leading Labour Party politician.
Read it at The Independent
###
Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2015/04/20/murdoch-to-staff-influence-the-election.html
Enrique
(27,461 posts)now people are going to start thinking that happens at Fox News.
ornotna
(10,793 posts)JFT96
brooklynite
(94,310 posts)Largely to cover the UK election, but it's great for over-all news gathering.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Fox and 'journalism' do not belong in the same sentence. Evil. That would belong.
RecoveringJournalist
(148 posts)Let me be the first to say, Vote Darth Murdoch and Darth Ailes 2016 - Feel the POWER of the dark side!
mwooldri
(10,299 posts)Wikipedia's entry is spot on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom - they break it down by political party.
Murdoch's papers have been almost totally Tory. Except when Blair was in. When Blair went out, so did Murdoch's support of Labour.
The good news about this is that you don't have to buy the gutter press if you don't want to. Get some wonderfully neutral reporting and turn on the TV or the radio... and when you hear the words "party political broadcast by the X party", it's your cue to change the channel.
T_i_B
(14,735 posts)In no small part due to the fact that the Tories are about as popular as bubonic plague north of the border.
And the SNP are the most likely partners for Labour in a minority government, so it stands to reason that they might put a stop to any attempt by Labour to go after News International.
Denzil_DC
(7,219 posts)Yeah, really feeling that Murdochy love up here ...
T_i_B
(14,735 posts)Or is the Scot bashing just reserved for the editions south of the border?
Denzil_DC
(7,219 posts)If you're lucky enough to have access online to the Sun behind its paywall, then there's this available UK-wide: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6362264/Labour-plotting-German-style-alliance-with-the-SNP.html
It's as if they imagine we wouldn't notice what they're saying about us "down south" in this day and age of social media: http://wingsoverscotland.com/to-break-your-walls/
Lots of opportunistic tut-tutting about the wrecking ball image in the (Labour-supporting, often rabidly anti-SNP) Daily Record: http://www.scotlandnow.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/nicola-sturgeon-slams-sun-newspaper-5344939
The Sun, even the English edition, has been a lot less offensive (and downright irresponsible) than the likes of the Telegraph, the Mail, and the Times.
We're apparently all mad, bad, and dangerous to know, let alone be allowed any part in the governance of the UK:
http://wingsoverscotland.com/zoomers-on-stunned/#more-69955
Most of the media are flailing wildly. Depending on the day, the outlet, and (in the case of print media) the location of publication, after the election the SNP are to being lined up for a treacherous deal with Cameron, Miliband, or, on a particularly bad day, Gozer.
T_i_B
(14,735 posts)Couldn't have put it better myself. Sooner or later the currant bun's strategy is going to backfire on them.
Fear-mongering about the SNP has become a big part of the Tory message, and as you know, that is what gets unquestioningly parroted by most of the UK media.
mwooldri
(10,299 posts)So to support the SNP in Scotland makes sense to Murdoch. But then again even the Daily Record knows Labour is on the ropes. We're likely looking at a Lab and SNP, maybe LibDem coalition as the end result. And maybe a forced no confidence vote in Parliament to force early elections if the major party feels it is politically expeditious to do so.
melman
(7,681 posts)but I think it's safe to say anyone that owns a newspaper aims to do this.