Google acknowledges 11 accidents with its self-driving cars
Source: AP-Excite
By JUSTIN PRITCHARD
LOS ANGELES (AP) Google Inc. revealed Monday that its self-driving cars have been in 11 minor traffic accidents since it began experimenting with the technology six years ago.
The company released the number after The Associated Press reported that Google had notified California of three collisions involving its self-driving cars since September, when reporting all accidents became a legal requirement as part of the permits for the tests on public roads.
The director of Google's self-driving car project wrote in a web post that all 11 accidents were minor "light damage, no injuries" and happened over 1.7 million miles of testing, including nearly 1 million miles in self-driving mode.
"Not once was the self-driving car the cause of the accident," wrote Google's Chris Urmson.
FULL story at link.
FILE - This May 13, 2014 file photo shows a row of Google self-driving Lexus cars at a Google event outside the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, Calif. Of the nearly 50 self-driving cars rolling around California roads and highways, four have gotten into accidents since September, 2014. That{2019}s when the state officially began permitting these cars of the future, which use sensors and computing power to maneuver around traffic. Three accidents involved souped-up Lexus SUVs run by Google Inc. The fourth was an Audi retrofitted by the parts supplier Delphi Automotive. Google and Delphi said the accidents were minor and their cars were not at fault.(AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150511/us--driverless_cars-accidents-64af115e7a.html
RandySF
(58,776 posts)Let's not act like tea baggers and say it can't be done.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Sienna86
(2,149 posts)Title is somewhat misleading. I look forward to the day when driverless cars will lessen out insurance premiums.
greyl
(22,990 posts)are frequently peppered with sensationalistic crap.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)it has been because some idiot on a cell phone ran into us. Stop light? Can't bother stopping because the conversation was too interesting. Used blinkers to signal using the turn lane? Just plow right into the car with that tow truck because the phone was more compelling than keeping your eyes on the road.
Just pile right into someone in a 20mph zone because fussing with whoever you were in a fight with on the phone wasn't bad enough.
Honk if you love Jesus; text if you want to meet him sooner.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,412 posts)Great one. Thanks.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)or at the very least robot assisted human drivers
human drivers are scary
onehandle
(51,122 posts)It's alarming that the goal isn't 'zero accidents.'
LisaL
(44,973 posts)None of the accidents were self-driving cars fault.
Hosnon
(7,800 posts)If it's even slightly better, lives and money will be saved.
"Zero accidents" is a perfect example of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)marble falls
(57,079 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)and adaptive cruise control.