Justices make it easier to sue over 401(k) retirement plans
Source: AP
WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously in favor of participants in employee retirement plans who object to companies' investment decisions that eat into retirement savings.
The justices on Monday revived claims by current and former employees of energy company Edison International. The employees argued that the company chose mutual funds with excessive fees.
Edison offers employees roughly 40 mutual funds to choose from in deciding how to invest. The case involved a few funds in which the company had chosen higher-cost ones open to the general public instead of identical investments with lower costs that are open only to institutional investors. The Edison employees contend that the company did not act in their best interests by choosing the higher-cost funds.
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/52555712504b4dd59af8d685587934a9/justices-make-it-easier-sue-over-401k-retirement-plans
still_one
(92,061 posts)better
closeupready
(29,503 posts)If everyone's 401(k) was self-directed? No way. Gotta protect that middleman.
still_one
(92,061 posts)yellowcanine
(35,693 posts)Most public agencies and non-profits give employees a choice of companies such as TIAA-CREF, Fidelity, etc. And within those plans the employee can select the fund balance based on various factors such as risk and length of time to retirement.
Javaman
(62,500 posts)race to the bottom.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)Make the limits you can contribute to tradional IRAs the same as 401Ks. That way, if you don't like the funds offered by your company, you can contribute to your own, self directed IRA. I've never undderstood why the limits are different anyway.