(Heartland Inst.) Group pulls plug on billboard linking global warming believers to terrorists
Source: Washington Post
A stark mug shot of domestic terrorist Ted Kaczynski briefly took center stage in the increasingly ugly debate over climate change Friday as the Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank funded by major corporations, launched a billboard campaign equating people convinced that global warming is real to the convicted killer.
I still believe in Global Warming. Do you? read big orange letters next to the Unabombers infamously grizzled face on an electronic billboard along the Eisenhower Expressway outside Chicago, the Heartland Institutes home.
The billboard went live Thursday afternoon. But by 4 p.m. Eastern time, an outcry from allies and opponents alike led the Heartland Institutes president, Joe Bast, to say he would switch off the sign within the hour.
The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise arent following the climate change debate, Bast wrote in an e-mail to some of the institutes supporters, explaining his decision to end the campaign.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/group-pulls-plug-on-billboard-linking-global-warming-believers-to-terrorists/2012/05/04/gIQAU2q51T_story.html
Uhh, is the Post clueless about science? Never ever label "believers" next to a scientifically accepted concept. This is just as absurd as "evolution believer" or "gravity believer".
frogmarch
(12,153 posts)throwing crap at the wall to see what'll stick.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Uhhhhhh. Okay. You know who else used emotional appeals when reason clearly failed? Yep. Nazis. Just like the Heartland Institute.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Why didn't they test a Yee Haw cowboy gun next to their temple to see if it's real ?
Fucking idiot flat earth believers.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)Please spread it far and wide.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)saras
(6,670 posts)And no, the Post isn't clueless, that "believers" is purely intentional. It's there for the same reason that people who should know better use the term Darwinism. Seriously, have you ever heard of anyone, ever, anywhere, insisting on the unitary nature of Darwin's thought, and the danger of contaminating his insights with those of his inferior followers? Where are these "Darwinists"? What do they think or believe?
Festivito
(13,452 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)"While we are on the subject..."
Festivito
(13,452 posts)Kurska
(5,739 posts)Logical fallacies are awesome.