Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,015 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:17 PM May 2012

(Heartland Inst.) Group pulls plug on billboard linking global warming believers to terrorists

Source: Washington Post

A stark mug shot of domestic terrorist Ted Kaczynski briefly took center stage in the increasingly ugly debate over climate change Friday as the Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank funded by major corporations, launched a billboard campaign equating people convinced that global warming is real to the convicted killer.

“I still believe in Global Warming. Do you?” read big orange letters next to the Unabomber’s infamously grizzled face on an electronic billboard along the Eisenhower Expressway outside Chicago, the Heartland Institute’s home.

The billboard went live Thursday afternoon. But by 4 p.m. Eastern time, an outcry from allies and opponents alike led the Heartland Institute’s president, Joe Bast, to say he would switch off the sign within the hour.

“The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it, but decided it was a necessary price to make an emotional appeal to people who otherwise aren’t following the climate change debate,” Bast wrote in an e-mail to some of the institute’s supporters, explaining his decision to end the campaign.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/group-pulls-plug-on-billboard-linking-global-warming-believers-to-terrorists/2012/05/04/gIQAU2q51T_story.html



Uhh, is the Post clueless about science? Never ever label "believers" next to a scientifically accepted concept. This is just as absurd as "evolution believer" or "gravity believer".
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. An emotional appeal in what is supposed to be a scientific debate?
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:33 PM
May 2012

Uhhhhhh. Okay. You know who else used emotional appeals when reason clearly failed? Yep. Nazis. Just like the Heartland Institute.

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)
3. “The Heartland Institute knew this was a risk when deciding to test it"
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:41 PM
May 2012

Why didn't they test a Yee Haw cowboy gun next to their temple to see if it's real ?
Fucking idiot flat earth believers.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
7. it might even backfire if people ended up reading Kaczynski's writing - it makes more sense than him
Sat May 5, 2012, 03:17 AM
May 2012

And no, the Post isn't clueless, that "believers" is purely intentional. It's there for the same reason that people who should know better use the term Darwinism. Seriously, have you ever heard of anyone, ever, anywhere, insisting on the unitary nature of Darwin's thought, and the danger of contaminating his insights with those of his inferior followers? Where are these "Darwinists"? What do they think or believe?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Heartland Inst.) Group p...