Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:11 PM May 2012

Soaring costs threaten Britain’s nuclear plans

Source: The Times of London

Energy policy hanging by thread after only credible company left to build nuclear reactors raises price by 40 per cent to £7 billion each

<snip>

Read more: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/business/industries/utilities/article3406852.ece



The article is behind a pay-wall, that headline and first sentence are on the front page of The Time website http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/ under the Busiress section.

It's also the first item in a Reuters list of top news stories today:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/07/press-digest-british-business-may-idUKL5E8G6A1H20120507

PRESS DIGEST - British business - May 7

Mon May 7, 2012 1:01am BST

The Times

SOARING COSTS THREATEN TO BLOW NUCLEAR PLAN APART

Energy policy is hanging by a thread after the only credible company left to build nuclear reactors in Britain increased the price by 40 percent to 7 billion pound ($11.31 billion) each.

<snip list of unrelated stories>

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Soaring costs threaten Britain’s nuclear plans (Original Post) bananas May 2012 OP
$11.3B out the gate... kristopher May 2012 #1
wind and efficiency are vastly cheaper. diane in sf May 2012 #2
In every way. Zoeisright May 2012 #3
Yes they are. kristopher May 2012 #4
Even GE Says So AndyTiedye May 2012 #5
And Britain is well-suited to offshore turbine development as well. nt NickB79 May 2012 #6

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
1. $11.3B out the gate...
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:28 PM
May 2012

How much do you suppose the price will go up once the UK has spent the first $5B and can no longer afford to back out of the deal?

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
3. In every way.
Mon May 7, 2012, 01:04 AM
May 2012

No poisons that last for hundreds of thousands of years to store and try to keep under wraps and under control. No prohibitively expensive maintenance and upkeep. No cancers, birth defects, and poisoned earth. Not to mention money.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
4. Yes they are.
Mon May 7, 2012, 03:34 AM
May 2012
On the Horizon: Deeper Wind, Faster Solar
By Steve Leone, Associate Editor, RenewableEnergyWorld.com
April 24, 2012

New Hampshire, USA -- Offshore wind technology is striving to reach new depths while the solar industry is facing a challenge to make rooftop installation easier than ever. Both announcements this week are structured to clear some of the fundamental hurdles facing the wind and the solar industries.

Ahead of an international clean energy conference this week in London, the U.K.’s Department of Energy and Climate Change said it is working with the U.S. Department of Energy on a plan to develop floating wind technology that will give turbines access to the strong, consistent resources currently out of reach of current wind farms.

On Tuesday, the DOE announced that it is making $5 million available this year toward the development of “plug-and-play” solar rooftop installations with the guiding principle that a system should be purchased, installed and made operational in one day....

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2012/04/on-the-horizon-deeper-wind-faster-solar?cmpid=WindNL-Thursday-May3-2012
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Soaring costs threaten Br...