Chris Coons and Bob Casey back Iran deal, putting Obama one vote from major diplomatic victory
Source: Washington Post
Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Bob Casey (D-Pa.) have decided to support the Iran nuclear deal, putting President Obama on the brink of a major diplomatic breakthrough that will allow him to fully implement the controversial deal over the objections of the Republican-led Congress.
Coons's decision, disclosed in an exclusive interview with The Washington Post, delivered a powerful blow to opponents of the plan because the Delaware Democrat had previously voiced some of the deepest skepticism about the controversial deal. It came as Casey announced support for the deal and left Obama needing just one more vote in the Senate to claim victory.
Coons reached his decision after many weeks of deliberation that included long talks with top administration officials including his political mentor, Vice President Biden and an exchange of letters with President Obama that codified the assurances he received about the pact's implementation.
...
Casey voiced similar views that, if the deal is implemented well, it will leave the U.S. military in a stronger place to take action if the Tehran regime violates its tenets. "I believe this agreement must be undergirded by a clear and unequivocal statement from both the Administration and the Congress: we are prepared to take military action if Iran attempts to develop a nuclear weapon," said Casey, who like Coons, is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/09/01/chris-coons-backs-iran-deal-putting-obama-on-the-brink-of-a-major-diplomatic-victory/
That's 33 confirmed. Very close to preserving the policy victory.
still_one
(92,061 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)policy stuff that's ongoing.
still_one
(92,061 posts)blm
(113,008 posts); )
obnoxiousdrunk
(2,909 posts)brooklynite
(94,333 posts)Chris Coons and Bob Casey back Iran deal, putting Obama one vote from major diplomatic victory
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/09/01/chris-coons-backs-iran-deal-putting-obama-on-the-brink-of-a-major-diplomatic-victory/
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)If you don't mind, I'll steal your link and update the story.
blm
(113,008 posts).
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)So what happens when he wraps up the votes needed? And how soon will it happen? I want this done asap.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)and found them odd. He said he didn't know who to believe on the matter. Shouldn't his own knowledge and intelligence play a roll in his decision making?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)or the AIPAC crowd.
He should figure out that if he votes with the Republicans on this, he loses the entire rationale for his Senate campaign.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)take the reins back.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Howard Dean knows how to do the job. I don't know who even makes that decision, though. Do you?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)replace her.He's the leader of the Dem party.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)for him to replace her. One can hope.
mcar
(42,278 posts)Thanks geek.
Hekate
(90,551 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,345 posts)Maybe enough coverage so he can vote against the agreement. If he does, he (and every other Dem who votes against it) can say goodbye to ever winning the D nomination. This is going to be a litmus test for many of us. At least Gillibrand had the smarts to understand that.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)inclined to vote with the Republicans, including his BFF's Chris Christie, Shmuley Boteach, and Robert Menendez.
BeyondGeography
(39,345 posts)As in he supports the agreement. He has been predictably mealy-mouthed about it to date.
ion_theory
(235 posts)Don't agree with Coons on every issue, but I can say that this year with 2 big NAYs on Keystone Pipeline and co-sponsored the FREEDOM Act in 2014. He may be a corporate/establishment Dem, but think I may be voting for him again. A shame the bar for voting for someone is "Do they have common sense and aren't a war-hawk.