Bear that nuzzled hiker is fatally shot by state officials
Source: Associated Press
Bear that nuzzled hiker is fatally shot by state officials
Updated 3:52 pm, Wednesday, September 2, 2015
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) Connecticut wildlife officials have shot and killed a young bear that closely followed and touched a hiker and became the center of a debate over the state's wildlife management practices.
The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection said Wednesday the bear was killed at Sessions Woods Wildlife Management Area, where it encountered a woman out for a walk last Friday and nuzzled her leg. The bear had been tagged following previous encounters with officials.
Wildlife officials say the male bear showed aggressive behavior. Animal protection advocates lobbied against the killing, saying the bear was curious and nonthreatening.
Officials on Tuesday fatally shot another bear they say was reported in the area where the encounter took place. Wildlife officials say that bear charged two agency staff members.
Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Bear-that-approached-hiker-fatally-shot-by-state-6481265.php
Coventina
(27,063 posts)Humans suck.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)ailsagirl
(22,885 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 3, 2015, 11:05 AM - Edit history (1)
Good response!!
I DESPISE this kind of thing-- just makes me effing FURIOUS!!!!!!!!
I loathe anthropocentrism!!!!!!!!!
an·thro·po·cen·tric
ˌanTHrəpəˈsentrik/
adjective
regarding humankind as the central or most important element of existence, especially as opposed to
God or animals.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's why it's so crucial for campers not to leave trash out, too. Bears who associate humans with "those yummy trash-snacks" lose their fear of humans, wander onto roads, and get struck by cars. Or wander into yards, which scares people, which scares the bear, who then mauls someone.
msongs
(67,361 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Better safe than sorry.
mahannah
(893 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It is sad but they had little choice. Bears must avoid people.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)them or where they may likely be.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)the story would have turned out differently.
Sorry, but being curious does not mean the animal is aggressive.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)There's a reason the saying is "a fed bear is a dead bear."
Once they stop respecting people's space . . .
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)This wasn't New fucking York City. It was a wildlife park.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bears don't know the difference between wildlife parks and someone's back yard.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And then eventually realizes we're a source of yummy trash.
And then teaches the rest of the bears that.
This is also why trash discipline is so extremely important for campers and hikers: if you love bears, you do not want them to love you back.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)well put.
DavidDvorkin
(19,469 posts)It's sad, but a bear who has become that unafraid of humans is dangerous.
Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)If he was aggressive he'd have demonstrated well known bear behavior such and grunting, padding the ground, and charging. He did none of that. He just sauntered up and sniffed. What is not known to the public is if the woman was having her period. It attracts male bears as well as other wild animals. That's all according to my wife, a certified wildlife rehabber who has had many years of experience with just about every type of critter there is.
Most state officials are clueless about wild animals. Seen it many times.
ailsagirl
(22,885 posts)Thank you
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)It seems from the article that the bear had gotten too close to park officials on at least two previous encounters. (Multiple encounters were referenced, so that's a minimum of two.)
So, this bear has had close encounters with humans at least three times. Unfortunately, that's a disaster waiting to happen.
I'm glad it was't me making the call to kill the bear, but I understand why it was made.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)There are issues with this science, but come on.
http://scicurious.scientopia.org/2012/02/03/friday-weird-science-does-your-menstrual-blood-attract-bears/
Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)I have seen written warnings posted on trailhead message boards.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Timothy Treadwell also 'touched' bears. let them approach him. One day one was hungry, tore him up & ate him and his girlfriend. His camera was still rolling and recorded the entire event.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)is that humans want to feed the wildlife (like deer), or they have food sources (bird feeders, trash) out that wildlife like bears are attracted to.
niyad
(113,074 posts)of bear incidents--including the rescue of a cub who had stuck its face in a pot, and couldn't get it off. nobody around here freaks out about the bears, or the deer, or the skunks, or raccoons, or even the occasional bobcat. (and, no, I don't live in the mountains)
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Your anthomorphism of animals is what helps to kill them.
1monster
(11,012 posts)was required to use it...
And animals "nuzzle" people all the time... cats, dogs, horses, etc. The word is meant for animals and using it to describe an animal behavior is not an "anthropomorphism" when describing an animal behavior.
nuzzle
[nuhz-uh l]
Spell Syllables
Word Origin
verb (used without object), nuzzled, nuzzling.
1.
to burrow or root with the nose, snout, etc., as an animal does:
a rabbit nuzzling into the snow.
2.
to thrust the nose, muzzle, etc.:
The dog nuzzled up to his master.
3.
to lie very close to someone or something; cuddle or snuggle up.
verb (used with object), nuzzled, nuzzling.
4.
to root up with the nose, snout, etc.:
training pigs to nuzzle truffles from the ground.
5.
to touch or rub with the nose, snout, muzzle, etc.
6.
to thrust the nose, muzzle, snout, etc., against or into:
The horse was nuzzling my pocket for sugar.
7.
to thrust (the nose or head), as into something.
8.
to lie very close to; cuddle or snuggle up to.
noun
9.
an affectionate embrace or cuddle.
glinda
(14,807 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,469 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,469 posts)And if it does happen, the bears and other large mammals will go, too.
svpadgham
(670 posts)You're more likely to get killed by a human. Should we kill the ones that nuzzle up to someone?
BillH2
(34 posts)Two of them got charged by a bear earlier in the week, so they say. That might have made them a little trigger happy. I think it might have that effect on me.
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)Shut down the park to people. Because they seem to keep killing the wildlife that is supposed to be preserved.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)There are places where human contact would be minimal to non-existant. At least it would be giving it a chance before just killing it.