Hillary Clinton on Private Email: ‘That Was a Mistake. I’m Sorry’
Source: ABC News
Hillary Clinton on Tuesday told ABC News David Muir that using a personal email account while Secretary of State was a mistake and that she is sorry for it.
"That was a mistake. Im sorry about that. I take responsibility, the Democratic presidential candidate told Muir in an exclusive interview in New York City.
This is the farthest Clinton has gone yet in offering an apology for her use of a private email server while Secretary of State.
Clinton told the Associated Press on Monday that she would not apologize for it because what I did was allowed.
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-private-email-mistake-im/story?id=33608970
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)she said she had nothing to apologize for, as everything had been approved. Talk about a 360!
Fearless
(18,421 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Tea Potty
(27 posts)Let the teeth-gnashing and backstabbing begin!
This ships goin' dowwwwwwwn
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)That was exactly my first thought.
My second was:
drip
drip
drip
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)But this is more like bending the space-time continuum at the speed of light.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)a bit frustrating.
The poll numbers must be in the tank for her to actually step up for a change. She has avoided precisely this for weeks, if not months.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)let the rabble have the rest, a cynical man might say.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)thesquanderer
(11,982 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)It is inherent in her character NOT to take responsibility. That is what is really killing her in the polls.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)EEO
(1,620 posts)Lychee2
(405 posts)An apology was not morally required. But even though she didn't need to apologize, she's doing it anyway, to go the second mile. No contradiction in that.
(I am just f***ing with you.
24601
(3,959 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)She's an incredibly tone-deaf, tone-blind candidate. If her advisors don't tell her how to play it, she has no sense of her own and if she becomes the nominee will really hurt the Democratic run for the WH.
orange you glad
(50 posts)Too bad she didn't say that to Andrea Mitchell; when she refused to simply say "yes," I stopped watching.
SunSeeker
(51,548 posts)As Rachel Maddow said, anyone who watched the Andrea Mitchell interview and did not think Hillary was apologetic did not watch the interview.
orange you glad
(50 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)SunSeeker
(51,548 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)And "I apologize" or words to that effect were never actually spoken?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)I am truly sorry, you sorry ....
SunSeeker
(51,548 posts)madville
(7,408 posts)That she was sorry that everyone was confused?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)SunSeeker
(51,548 posts)She repeatedly expresses regret and says she should have done it differently. She apologized for the confusion this has caused, and she said she regretted doing it. That is why at the end of the segment Rachel Maddow said that it was an apology. But some people will never be satisfied. They will want her to prostrate herself and even then, they will never be satisfied. They want her gone, defeated. Well it's not going to happen. She apologized, but she did not retreat.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/clinton-addresses-e-mail-questions-directly-519909955735
silenttigersong
(957 posts)that is the question
ram2008
(1,238 posts)That should be her new campaign theme.
She should fire all of her advisors.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Autumn
(45,026 posts)The new improved Hillary? Does she even realize what this makes her look like? Pick a stand Hillary.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Autumn
(45,026 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 8, 2015, 08:28 PM - Edit history (1)
the snark was uncalled for. Had a bad WTF going on there.ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)it IS a worry that drives us this way. We recognize the serious weaknesses inherent in Hillary, Chen if her most rabid supporters do not. We see that hers is a disaster in the making, unless she makes changes, structural changes. So far, she is changing the seating for the next string concerto on the Titanic. What is it, version 4.0 already?
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)arrows point another direction.
I wish there was a political weather page so we...
Oh, wait. I don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
randys1
(16,286 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)for fun, but I cant, I am not fast enough
Response to randys1 (Reply #29)
Post removed
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Congrats!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)for that "mistake". It's beyond me why some can overlook such serious "mistakes" when there are other candidates that haven't made mistakes of that magnitude. I guess it's hero worship. No one has told me anything different. Wait one person did tell me they like Clinton because she is tough like Margret Thatcher. Yikes!
closeupready
(29,503 posts)That's not a direct quote, but she was asked about it back in 2006 or 7, IIRC.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)c588415
(285 posts)Her use of a private email server caused no harm to no one. If Sanders win the primary, then he will have my vote in the General
Lychee2
(405 posts)How do you know that foreign intelligence services weren't monitoring her server? There was satellite information on North Korea in one of the posts. Did North Korea hack her server? Did that help them in some way to harm the US? We just don't know.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)They keep posting about it here even though nobody else cares.
Lychee2
(405 posts)http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/bernie-sanders-leads-hillary-clinton-9-n-h-gains-iowa-n422111
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)We'll see who wins, once the primary season actually starts.
Lychee2
(405 posts)It's great that people get to support the candidate of their choice, and the outcome gets decided democratically. A lot of countries don't allow that.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Hillary's not my favorite candidate, but this manufactured faux outrage is getting quite tedious.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Cute!
c588415
(285 posts)Lychee2
(405 posts)Stick with your candidate.
youceyec
(394 posts)you all put your double standards away when it comes time to vote unless you want Bush or Trump running the country.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Now please drop out.
donna123
(182 posts)It's the repubs trying to make much ado about nothing as far as I'm concerned. If only repubs would expend as much energy on improving our nation as they do on Clinton witchhunts. The polls are all a joke as well. MSM seem to be the only ones who want people to get into a lather about things. We really need to shorten our campaign season to like 6 months but the MSM would go bonkers. MSM are the only ones who love this and salivate at the prospect of anything minor and then try to make everyone else think it's newsworthy. Faux is of course the worst about it.
If anything, a private email may be safer as Chinese and Russians are hacking into government stuff left and right.
napi21
(45,806 posts)I don't need an apology, and I think those who DO would never vote for her anyway. I just saw a guest on Rachel's show who said the same thing.