Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:32 AM Sep 2015

Burning remaining fossil fuels would eradicate Antarctic ice

Source: sciencenews.org by Thomas Sumner

Exhausting all attainable fossil fuels would annihilate the Antarctic ice sheet and raise global sea levels by as much as 58 meters, more than the height of Niagara Falls, new research calculates.

Enough fossil fuels remain to release around 10,000 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere. The future of Antarctic ice depends on how much of that stockpile society burns through, researchers report September 11 in Science Advances. Simulating how Antarctic ice will respond to rising temperatures and a changing environment, the team estimates that 600 billion to 800 billion tons of further carbon emissions would destabilize the West Antarctic ice sheet. Humans emitted an estimated 545 billion tons of carbon from 1870 through 2014, with approximately 10 billion tons released in 2013. Burning all remaining fossil fuels would result in a nearly ice-free Antarctic.

Even though the simulated emissions were released in fewer than 500 years, the effects of elevated carbon dioxide lingered for more than 10,000 years, the researchers say.

Read more: https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-ticker/burning-remaining-fossil-fuels-would-eradicate-antarctic-ice



21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burning remaining fossil fuels would eradicate Antarctic ice (Original Post) L. Coyote Sep 2015 OP
Interesting... n/t xocet Sep 2015 #1
Only one word I can find, "shit". Really scary, frightening. 7wo7rees Sep 2015 #2
"we are susceptible to being extinct along with everything else" progree Sep 2015 #4
I think really important threads like this sink... mak3cats Sep 2015 #3
Wow, the world as we know it is ending and you focus on slamming DU? L. Coyote Sep 2015 #5
Where was I slamming DU? mak3cats Sep 2015 #15
Al Gore for president! McCamy Taylor Sep 2015 #6
Gore should have known better. Wilms Sep 2015 #9
Forget the zombie apocalypse! It's gonna be the Tentacle Monster apocalypse instead. McCamy Taylor Sep 2015 #7
K & R Duppers Sep 2015 #8
good bye ice. nt Javaman Sep 2015 #10
9 degrees hotter, I want to get out of Texas and find cooler & higher land. Sunlei Sep 2015 #11
Yes, but from the point of view of oil companies: tclambert Sep 2015 #12
They will soon be shifting their investments into the most profitable sector, wind and solar L. Coyote Sep 2015 #13
Kick WheelWalker Sep 2015 #14
Permian Extenction 2.0 (nt) paleotn Sep 2015 #16
The good news is we'll never get the chance to burn all the planet's fossil fuels NickB79 Sep 2015 #17
What would be the course of action here Mr.Squirreleo Sep 2015 #18
Simple, convert to clean energy instead of combustion energy. L. Coyote Sep 2015 #20
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #19
Europe past and present. L. Coyote Sep 2015 #21

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
2. Only one word I can find, "shit". Really scary, frightening.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:46 AM
Sep 2015

At what point will humans realize that we are susceptible to being extinct along with everything else we are wiping out on this little biosphere we call Earth?

progree

(10,901 posts)
4. "we are susceptible to being extinct along with everything else"
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:07 AM
Sep 2015
All of Antarctica Might Melt, Drowning Major Cities, Newsweek, 9/11/15

The global average temperature, at that point ((when all the fossil fuels have been burned)), will be around 9 degrees Celsius (roughly 16 degrees Fahrenheit) higher than it is today. That is not a climate scenario under which many things would survive.

Experts have already called the possibility of exceeding 2 degrees Celsius warming “dangerous,” and 4 degrees Celsius warming a “catastrophic” scenario. A world that is 9 degrees Celsius hotter would likely be unrecognizable and perhaps even uninhabitable.

http://news.yahoo.com/antarctica-might-melt-drowning-major-182728299.html

mak3cats

(1,573 posts)
3. I think really important threads like this sink...
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:06 AM
Sep 2015

...because this site does seem to be populated by very intelligent people. As such, we know what studies like this mean, and no one wants to really think about it. At least I don't. I'm middle-aged, and remember this:

http://clevelandhistorical.org/items/show/63

I hate fucking SUV's, and they're all around me every day. Gotta fuel 'em! Can't make the owners pay extra for taking more than their share of the planet's resources! Wouldn't be prudent!

Glad I don't have any children...

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
5. Wow, the world as we know it is ending and you focus on slamming DU?
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:54 AM
Sep 2015

Maybe we could focus on the problem instead.

I do want to think about it instead of dismissing it. That's why I posted it. I'm not as worried about SUVs as I am the US military and aircraft carriers. Or the Big Oil interests controlling US public policy and Congress critters. There are solutions to the situation and thinking about it is essential. It wouldn't be very intelligent to not think about a problem when confronted by it. In fact, that is what I would expect of not very intelligent people, unlike the people here who do address these issues daily.

mak3cats

(1,573 posts)
15. Where was I slamming DU?
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 10:51 PM
Sep 2015

I agree with you completely. Last night's post was late; I was already feeling rather depressed and my words were pretty much just anger and despair. The world as we know it is indeed ending.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
9. Gore should have known better.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 06:17 AM
Sep 2015
NAFTA Report Warns Of Trade Deal Environmental Disasters

A report due to be released Tuesday aims to offer an object lesson to President Barack Obama: Free trade deals have high costs in unintended consequences for the environment, people's way of life, and local sovereignty.

The report by the Sierra Club and other groups in Canada and Mexico, released on the 20th anniversary of the North American Free Trade Agreement, summarizes more than 100 nonprofit, government and scholarly studies of NAFTA, and draws a damning picture.

snip

“Nearly 20 years into NAFTA and the evidence is in," Ilana Solomon, director of the Sierra Club’s Responsible Trade Program, said in a statement. "NAFTA led to an expansion of deforestation and unsustainable water use in order to support export-oriented agriculture. It gave massive rights to corporations to challenge environmental and climate safeguards in private trade tribunals. It expanded exports in dirty fossil fuels in a time when we should be moving beyond these outdated fuels and investing in clean energy. Governments must take a page out of the history books and stop negotiating trade pacts that gut protections for our air, water, land, workers, and communities.”

snip

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/11/nafta-environment_n_4938556.html

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
11. 9 degrees hotter, I want to get out of Texas and find cooler & higher land.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 11:34 AM
Sep 2015

It's already bad with the 8-10 inch rains in a day near Houston. If I didn't put in a drainage plan to move that water out fast, I would have flooded twice this year alone. On property that has never flooded before.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
12. Yes, but from the point of view of oil companies:
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:54 PM
Sep 2015

No further emissions: 0¢
500 gigatons of carbon: $$$$$
1,000 gigatons: $$$$$$$$$$
2,500 gigatons: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
5,000 gigatons: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
10,000 gigatons: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
13. They will soon be shifting their investments into the most profitable sector, wind and solar
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 05:03 PM
Sep 2015

as the economic landscape shifts. You can count on corporations going after the best bottom line.

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
17. The good news is we'll never get the chance to burn all the planet's fossil fuels
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:32 AM
Sep 2015

We'll see a planetary collapse of civilization, Mad Max style, as climate change destroys our farmlands, forests and ocean life, and the survivors reverting back to a Medieval level of technology, long before we zero in on the last coal, oil and gas reserves.

See! Optimism!

Mr.Squirreleo

(21 posts)
18. What would be the course of action here
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 03:48 AM
Sep 2015

How to people purpose that civilization as it currently carry on without the use of fossil fuels?

-Electric cars are a long way from being practical for all people as they currently exists. Even if they where the amount of time it would take to phase out the petrol based car would be on a scale of decades. When you factor in the facts that a large percentage of people do not have the money to buy new electric cars coupled with the longevity of the car being in question (the batteries range will dissipate with age making used cars useless) it could take even longer.

-Electric trucks (long haul) won't become viable for a long long time. The benefits drivers would archive from not having to pay gas would be completely destroyed by the inconvenience of having to what long stretches of time off the road recharging their batteries. This is important as practically all goods sold in any every store around the world have been in the back of a truck for at least some period of time after leaving the factory.

-Electric vehicles are simply not an option for many around the world. They require well maintained roads and a reliable electric grid. There are also issues for those in cold climates where the range of the vehicles is severely reduced due to the cold.

Im just not seeing a solution to this problem, at least not on a time scale of less than 50-75 years (even that being a stretch)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Burning remaining fossil ...