Carson doubles down on no Muslims in the White House
Source: The Hill
Carson ignited a media firestorm in a Sunday morning interview with Chuck Todd on "Meet the Press," in which he said he would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation.
...snip...
In an interview with The Hill, Carson opened up about why he believes a Muslim would be unfit to serve as commander in chief.
I do not believe Sharia is consistent with the Constitution of this country, Carson said. Muslims feel that their religion is very much a part of your public life and what you do as a public official, and thats inconsistent with our principles and our Constitution.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/254330-carson-doubles-down-on-no-muslims-in-the-white-house
I agree...the Bible is a much better platform:
big_dog
(4,144 posts)so where will the Carson voters go now?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,609 posts)says Carson: Muslims feel that their religion is very much a part of your public life and what you do as a public official, and thats inconsistent with our principles and our Constitution. But isn't that exactly what the fundies want Christian politicians to do?
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)very much a part of your public life and what you do as a public official ...." So, good advice, don't elect a Republican because they seem unable to separate their fundamentalism from politics.
mackerel
(4,412 posts)Did this guy really go to medical school?
herding cats
(19,558 posts)He doesn't even know, "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." That's article VI, paragraph 3 of the US constitution.
Clueless? Check.
What's scary is way too few people know that anymore too.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)William Seger
(10,775 posts)They ignore the parts they don't like.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Too true
hatrack
(59,578 posts)So much for medical training.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ben-carson-evolution-absurd-myth-give-me-break
hibbing
(10,095 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)Carson recycling bigotry and religious intollerance
sarge43
(28,940 posts)During the 1960 campaign John Kennedy had reassure the Greater Houston Ministerial Association that the Pope wouldn't be running the US.
http://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/JFK-in-History/JFK-and-Religion.aspx
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,325 posts)I think it was a valid issue even on DU. Santorum was the Catholic Taliban.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/rick-santorums-journey-to-devout-catholicism-view-of-religion-in-governance/2012/03/16/gIQAj4NzNS_story.html
I don't think the Kennedy clan had (or has) the same super-right-wing Catholic fervor as Santorum. They were more "normal" in that sense.
Paladin
(28,243 posts)I was just a kid at the time, but I can still remember some of our neighbors, vehemently arguing that if JFK was elected, he'd take his marching orders directly from The Vatican. Sad that so little has changed.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)jmowreader
(50,530 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)ToxMarz
(2,162 posts)see the parallel, but somehow with religion involved it seems to be viewed differently. It was also the African American vote (70%) organized through the churches that passed Proposition 8 banning gay marriage in California.
elleng
(130,749 posts)that your religion is very much a part of your public life and what you do as a public official, right???
Bye bye!!!
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)Why does anyone take an oath on the Bible or any other "holy book" for that matter?
The President takes and oath to support and defend the Constitution. Why not take the oath with one hand on a copy of the Constitution?
former9thward
(31,943 posts)I didn't think so...
mdbl
(4,973 posts)Doesn't matter if it's Obama or anyone else. Religion has no part in our secular government. Laws do.
moondust
(19,961 posts)Should a Christian be allowed to hold any public office if their religion prevents them from doing the job?
longship
(40,416 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)And he's supposed to be on of their "smart" candidates?
Milliesmom
(493 posts)jalan48
(13,842 posts)The Republican's love to divert attention away from issues facing the country to non-issues (emotionally laden ) that might face the country years from now. I guess Carson is just a long range thinker.
douggg
(239 posts)leading our country as they protest the funerals of our military members.
Christian of course.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Response to brooklynite (Original post)
trusty elf This message was self-deleted by its author.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)tblue37
(65,227 posts)RW fundie Christians are always violating their oath of office in order to impose their own religious beliefs through their public office.
Some reporter should press him to criticize these two and all other Christian officeholders who do that.
hatrack
(59,578 posts)I'm so sick of these God-botherers I could just about break something . . .
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,865 posts)They are the party of cowardice. They will find any reason to fear something and be against it because they cannot handle new and different, in any way, shape or form.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the u.s. in his view should be a christian theocracy.
he wants the pres to put his hand on a bible
well, ben, it was fun while it lasted...
They_Live
(3,224 posts)but a STACK of bibles.
Dr. Carson writing his own Rx?
murielm99
(30,717 posts)I hope they are voting. The repubbies just lost another voting bloc.