Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,452 posts)
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 07:02 AM Sep 2015

Poll: Clinton's lead over Sanders grows

Source: CNN

Hillary Clinton's lead in the Democratic presidential primary race has grown -- and if Vice President Joe Biden decides to stay out of the race, her numbers would rise even higher, a new CNN/ORC poll shows.

Clinton is backed by 42% of Democratic primary voters nationally, compared to 24% for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, 22% for Biden and 1% for former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley.

That's a marked improvement over an early September CNN/ORC poll that found Clinton leading Sanders, 37% to 27%, with Biden at 20%.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/21/politics/hillary-clinton-leads-bernie-sanders-2016/index.html

78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll: Clinton's lead over Sanders grows (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2015 OP
Lovely news to start the week with. Congrats to Hillary and her team riversedge Sep 2015 #1
Highlights... riversedge Sep 2015 #5
Good news. On the rebound FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #15
I don't mean to rain on your parade, but no-one under 50 was polled. Betty Karlson Sep 2015 #29
What more do you expect from Chicken Noodle News? n/t RoccoR5955 Sep 2015 #34
Debunked. DCBob Sep 2015 #43
How do you know that? Lychee2 Sep 2015 #50
Check out page 7... Helen Borg Sep 2015 #60
It does not mean there were not polled. DCBob Sep 2015 #61
Hmm... JackRiddler Sep 2015 #69
Congrats for doing what, exactly? Dopers_Greed Sep 2015 #45
Perhaps you missed all the interviews and shows Hillary has been doing past few weeks. riversedge Sep 2015 #78
People haven't considered that the only ones paying attebtion now are the most interested Democrats Renew Deal Sep 2015 #2
Nah, can't say that. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2015 #71
392 Samplings is not much of a poll? INdemo Sep 2015 #3
Unless the poll shows your candidate ahead. moobu2 Sep 2015 #8
No if Bernie was ahead I would say the same. INdemo Sep 2015 #10
I'd say I have zero stock in polls PatrynXX Sep 2015 #31
With the DNC leadership you just might be INdemo Sep 2015 #36
If your candidate was ahead in this poll, murielm99 Sep 2015 #64
True enough. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2015 #73
It has a 5% margin of error, which means the sample size is accurate pnwmom Sep 2015 #11
Actually she's closing the gap in both FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #16
That's plenty to be statistically significant. Gman Sep 2015 #20
She's alternating the lead in Iowa and down a few % in NH, but......... George II Sep 2015 #39
Politico:- Poll: Clinton picking up steam against Sanders riversedge Sep 2015 #4
A Vote For Hillary In The Primaries Is A Vote For Trump In The General cantbeserious Sep 2015 #6
You can't be serious. Nitram Sep 2015 #13
I love how people can conveniently forget humbled_opinion Sep 2015 #21
No one should be equating either Bernie or Hillary with trump. Bubzer Sep 2015 #22
Exactly. nt Nitram Sep 2015 #23
One Presumes That Irony Is Lost On Some cantbeserious Sep 2015 #37
Iknowright? OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #40
Of course it is. She's the chosen one. Vinca Sep 2015 #7
WORD. SusanaMontana41 Sep 2015 #72
Do we want a candidate who's lead hinges on someone else staying out of the race? pipoman Sep 2015 #9
Yes, because Mitt Romney could jump in to the race any day now. Major Hogwash Sep 2015 #44
Another bogus CNN poll. Bernie is still way ahead! Madmiddle Sep 2015 #12
Now, now, it's not bogus just because everyone polled was over 50... heh. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #27
I'm not sure why you think that, but either way its not true Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #28
So at best, even by your own logic, they polled less than 8.5% people under 50? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #33
So at best, even by your own logic... OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #41
I don't think that's what it means. David__77 Sep 2015 #52
Any poll not favorable to Bernie is bogus redstateblues Sep 2015 #66
The 7 stages of grief. Nitram Sep 2015 #14
O dear, that was a zinger. LOL. n/t Betty Karlson Sep 2015 #17
I'm curious, how did Barak and Hillary look at this time during 2012 primary?? eom a kennedy Sep 2015 #18
*2008 NuclearDem Sep 2015 #48
*slap face*.......sorry, were polls looking like then this far out from the election. eom a kennedy Sep 2015 #53
This is great news Gothmog Sep 2015 #19
They need to stop including Biden in every poll mcar Sep 2015 #24
No, "they" need that desperately. JackRiddler Sep 2015 #76
no one under 50 polled? imthevicar Sep 2015 #25
^^^^ This. OP fail. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #26
People under 50 were polled. Stop spreading false information. Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #30
Yup, and the margin of error was so large TM99 Sep 2015 #35
They didn't throw them out Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #56
a sample size large enough to do proper statistical analysis. GeorgeGist Sep 2015 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #65
Look at the overall poll TM99 Sep 2015 #58
Wrong - go read the methodology section of the poll results again. nt hack89 Sep 2015 #32
I think the next CNN poll will give a better indication of the trend Blasphemer Sep 2015 #42
Gonna be lots of people stomping their feet and pouting about a "fixed election" come February/March alcibiades_mystery Sep 2015 #46
Nice photo on CNN now.. DCBob Sep 2015 #47
Immaculate Conception? Helen Borg Sep 2015 #59
For information, Hillary Clinton Rates Unfavorably in New York State Poll. elleng Sep 2015 #49
K&R. Go Hillary! lunamagica Sep 2015 #51
Funny the previous CNN poll with Bernie gaining had same issue with under 50 crosstabs.. DCBob Sep 2015 #54
Don't bring that up. It upsets the Bernie partisans. nt Adrahil Sep 2015 #55
She has that national primary in the bag. frylock Sep 2015 #62
Well, that's all she wrote. It's all over. tabasco Sep 2015 #63
Good news for Hillary Bounzer Sep 2015 #67
Her name is a household word. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #68
Two conservative blogs commission a poll where Sanders leads Clinton Bounzer Sep 2015 #70
um.. so that is where that B. lead came from. Thanks riversedge Sep 2015 #77
I may have my preferences between Clinton, Biden, and Sanders. . . . BigDemVoter Sep 2015 #74
How to obscure reality by including non-candidates. JackRiddler Sep 2015 #75

riversedge

(70,174 posts)
5. Highlights...
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 07:44 AM
Sep 2015



Story highlights

Hillary Clinton's lead in the Democratic primary has expanded to 18 percentage points nationally
If Joe Biden doesn't enter the race, Clinton's lead would grow to nearly 2-to-1 over Bernie Sanders
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
29. I don't mean to rain on your parade, but no-one under 50 was polled.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:33 AM
Sep 2015

My guess is this poll is worth nothing at all. Sanders' support is found especially among millennials.

Rebounds may be possible, but that requires a representative polling group. For instance, there were next to no minorities in this poll. If Mrs. Clinton has affirmed her hold over these voters, it is not reflected in this poll either.

The poll is worthless and the results are worthy of Fox. Bad call on the part of CNN.

 

Lychee2

(405 posts)
50. How do you know that?
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:03 PM
Sep 2015

Straight question. The poll describes itself this way:

Interviews with 1,006 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC
International on September 17 - 19, 2015. The margin of sampling
error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage
points.

The sample also includes 924 interviews among registered voters (plus
or minus 3 percentage points).

This sample includes 606 interviews among landline respondents and
400 interviews among cell phone respondents.


http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/09/20/dempoll.pdf

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
60. Check out page 7...
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 01:10 PM
Sep 2015

The under 50 has N/A, meaning that they were not polled. Very disturbing poll for this reason, since the description says nothing about it being only for people > 50!

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
61. It does not mean there were not polled.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 01:16 PM
Sep 2015

They were just not displayed in the crosstabs section due to large error rate due to small sample size. The overall survey result includes them. This only impacts the crosstabs breakdown. Its a survey science thing... if the error rate is very high don't even show it because it could be misleading. They deal with the small sample size by weighting. This is a good poll.. imo.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
69. Hmm...
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 03:46 PM
Sep 2015

This admission hardly inspires confidence that the poll reflects the views of under 50s.

Renew Deal

(81,851 posts)
2. People haven't considered that the only ones paying attebtion now are the most interested Democrats
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 07:08 AM
Sep 2015

Her lead will continue to grow as less interested Dems check in.

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
71. Nah, can't say that.
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 05:11 AM
Sep 2015

Democrats are plenty engaged, as are Repignicans.

I can't remember this level of sniping so early in a campaign, though.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
3. 392 Samplings is not much of a poll?
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 07:20 AM
Sep 2015

Just enough to report a poll was taken...so I dont put much stock into this poll
And just what would those numbers be if Biden entered the race?

Elections are won by votes. How is Hillary doing in Iowa in NH?

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
10. No if Bernie was ahead I would say the same.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:23 AM
Sep 2015

Networks take these or have these polls taken just so they can report poll results.
Faux used to report results in 2012 for even less samplings just so they could report Romney was tied with Obama which of course wasnt the case at all.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
31. I'd say I have zero stock in polls
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:36 AM
Sep 2015

just look at Mitt and Fox Nuts. oh that is not right Megyn go check the MEN they know it. out lier polls. but either way. Hillary and Trump don't see much difference. Hillary and Bush Jr don't see much difference and they own the same things O_O so if you like jr. you'll love hillary. Big difference between people who get called and assume hillary will win and people who bother to show up for Caucuses and Primaries. They decide who's going to run not polls. and Hillary still went from a shoo in to I don't know to I don't know if she has the get out power to win the General . So with Hillary .... if she wins either way it'll be a bit more Red 4 years. and this is my opinion.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
36. With the DNC leadership you just might be
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 10:06 AM
Sep 2015

Correct. Voters want a change a real change and Bernie Sanders could/would draw Republican voters and the so called Reagan Democrats . There are those that would vote for Kermit the Frog if Hillary is the nominee.

murielm99

(30,724 posts)
64. If your candidate was ahead in this poll,
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 02:30 PM
Sep 2015

It would be posted twice on the front page, with forty recs.

I expect the debunking. Yawn.

pnwmom

(108,972 posts)
11. It has a 5% margin of error, which means the sample size is accurate
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:26 AM
Sep 2015

after accounting for the margin of error.

A larger sample would have had a smaller margin of error, but both would be accurate, 95% of the time, to within their stated MOE's.

George II

(67,782 posts)
39. She's alternating the lead in Iowa and down a few % in NH, but.........
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 10:12 AM
Sep 2015

....there are 4,483 delegates up for grabs. Iowa and New Hampshire have only 54 and 32 delegates (86 total), less than 2% of total delegates.

And the OP article has the numbers WITH Biden in the race (Clinton up 18%) or without (Clinton up 29%)

If I was a Sanders follower, I'd be worried that he's only 2% ahead of an undeclared candidate.

riversedge

(70,174 posts)
4. Politico:- Poll: Clinton picking up steam against Sanders
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 07:40 AM
Sep 2015



POLITICO ‏@politico 2m2 minutes ago

Poll: Clinton picking up steam against Sanders http://politi.co/1MDnmWP | Getty



Poll: Clinton picking up steam against Sanders

By Nick Gass

09/21/15, 06:41 AM EDT

In a reversal of a recent slump, Hillary Clinton rose among Democratic voters in a new CNN/ORC national poll out Monday morning, widening the gap between herself and Bernie Sanders. And if Vice President Joe Biden decides against running for the presidency, her advantage could rise even further.

Clinton picked up 42 percent, with Sanders grabbing 24 percent and Biden, who has not made a decision about running, with 22 percent. Other candidates polled within the margin of error. But if Biden elects not to run, Clinton's lead over Sanders jumps to 57 percent to 28 percent, up from 48 percent to 32 percent in the previous CNN poll.

In that poll, conducted earlier this month, Clinton drew 37 percent to Sanders' 27 percent, while Biden took in 20 percent.
150920_carly_fiorina_ap_1160.jpg



The latest poll comes as the former secretary of state continues a recent blitz of sit-down interviews with national TV networks in an effort to shift the narrative between her campaign and the press.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/poll-cnn-hillary-clinton-democratic-voters-bernie-sanders-joe-biden-2016-213870#ixzz3mN9LvYd0

humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
21. I love how people can conveniently forget
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:18 AM
Sep 2015

about all the baggage that Hillary will bring to the general election and then try to project that onto the other candidates in the race.

Vinca

(50,248 posts)
7. Of course it is. She's the chosen one.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 07:58 AM
Sep 2015

Limit the debates so no one will know who Bernie is. Good tactic. I wouldn't want to debate Bernie, either.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
9. Do we want a candidate who's lead hinges on someone else staying out of the race?
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:22 AM
Sep 2015

Historically wild proclamations of victory this far out have meant ultimate defeat..."more of the same" candidates will be upset this cycle.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
44. Yes, because Mitt Romney could jump in to the race any day now.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 10:53 AM
Sep 2015

And that would upset everything that the Democrats have tried to avoid this year . . . having one of their candidates face off against one of the most aggressive, effective Republican presidential candidates the GOP has ever had!!
As long as Joe keeps his shoes on, Mitt will probably sit this one out.
But, if Joe decides to sit back and put on his loafers . . . look out!
Anything could happen in the Romney camp!

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
28. I'm not sure why you think that, but either way its not true
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:32 AM
Sep 2015

There were people polled in every age group. It was listed as NA, because the sample size was a bit smaller relative to the population, and it had a sample error rate higher than 8.5%

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
33. So at best, even by your own logic, they polled less than 8.5% people under 50?
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:39 AM
Sep 2015

Yeah, that really reflects the general population.

You can't spin it easily. Either they polled no one under 50 or they polled so few people under 50 that they can't break it out of the error rate. Either way, it's an incredibly skewed poll, skewed to the old people who tend to vote more for Hillary and less for Bernie.

David__77

(23,364 posts)
52. I don't think that's what it means.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:21 PM
Sep 2015

According to the survey details located at http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/09/20/dempoll.pdf:

Crosstabs on the following pages only include results for subgroups with enough unweighted cases to produce a sampling error of +/-8.5 percentage points or less. Some subgroups represent too small a share of the national population to produce crosstabs with an acceptable sampling error.


What this does tell me is that there were more people surveyed in the 50-64 age group than in the 18-49 age group, and there were more people surveyed in the 65+ age group than in the 18-49 age group.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
66. Any poll not favorable to Bernie is bogus
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:02 AM
Sep 2015

and obviously tampered with by the 1% corporatist third way centrist establishment types

a kennedy

(29,642 posts)
53. *slap face*.......sorry, were polls looking like then this far out from the election. eom
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:24 PM
Sep 2015

Last edited Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:32 AM - Edit history (1)

mcar

(42,287 posts)
24. They need to stop including Biden in every poll
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:21 AM
Sep 2015

Some polling to see where he'd stand, yes. But he shouldn't be in every one until and if he declares. Love Joe but this falsely skews the results.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
76. No, "they" need that desperately.
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:06 PM
Sep 2015

A clear Sanders vs. Clinton match up is going to show nothing but rises for Sanders as people become aware of him.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
26. ^^^^ This. OP fail.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:29 AM
Sep 2015

Her 'lead grows' when you completely exclude age groups more likely to vote for Sanders and poll only the age group that tends to vote more for her.

heh.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
35. Yup, and the margin of error was so large
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:55 AM
Sep 2015

that they had to throw out those results.

So this poll is left with those only over 50 being in the results.

Yes, this is a thoroughly flawed poll.

But please continue to cling to them as long as you must.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
38. They didn't throw them out
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 10:11 AM
Sep 2015

They just didn't include them in the breakdowns. It was included in the overall poll.

Also, just because I cling to facts, and don't like people spreading false info, don't assume that I'm supporting clinton.

I've actually been banned from the clinton group, and I am a Sanders supporter.

Response to TM99 (Reply #35)

GeorgeGist

(25,315 posts)
57. a sample size large enough to do proper statistical analysis.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:55 PM
Sep 2015

A sample size too small gets science papers rejected pronto.

Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #57)

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
58. Look at the overall poll
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 01:05 PM
Sep 2015

and the actual numbers for those under 50.

It is a typical MSM poll without a lot of merit.

Blasphemer

(3,261 posts)
42. I think the next CNN poll will give a better indication of the trend
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 10:37 AM
Sep 2015

Due to the MoE for both of the last two. However, worst case, Clinton's numbers have stabilized, which is still good news for the Clinton campaign. If she weathers this past summer, I think the only thing that could prevent her from winning the nomination is a Biden entry. Polling behind in IA and NH could end up being an unexpected advantage. It potentially opens the door for a "Comeback Kid" narrative like Bill's in '92.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
46. Gonna be lots of people stomping their feet and pouting about a "fixed election" come February/March
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 11:18 AM
Sep 2015

Is the Sanders supporters bubble of sameness more powerful than even the Romney bubble was in 2012?

Time will tell.

elleng

(130,821 posts)
49. For information, Hillary Clinton Rates Unfavorably in New York State Poll.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 11:40 AM
Sep 2015

A rough political summer has left Hillary Rodham Clinton with negative favorability ratings in a New York State poll for the first time, a low mark in the state she represented as a senator for eight years.

Mrs. Clinton was viewed unfavorably by 51 percent of the voters polled, compared with 46 percent who see her in a favorable light, a new Siena College survey showed. That is a change from a 56 percent favorable rating and a 40 percent unfavorable rating she had in the same survey in July.

Mrs. Clinton is still viewed positively by 70 percent of Democrats, the poll shows. But even in the state she adopted and represented from 2001 through 2008, her poll numbers have followed the same trend as her national numbers, suffering after a summer of questions about her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.

Her strongest area of support comes from New York City; her numbers elsewhere in the state — in the upstate and suburban areas, where she spent years working to build her support as a senator — suffer a greater hit.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/09/21/hillary-clinton-rates-unfavorably-in-new-york-state-poll/?

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
54. Funny the previous CNN poll with Bernie gaining had same issue with under 50 crosstabs..
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:28 PM
Sep 2015


Didnt hear any complaints back then.
 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
63. Well, that's all she wrote. It's all over.
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 01:34 PM
Sep 2015

All other candidates except for Clinton should just pack up and go home because of this CNN poll.

 

Lychee2

(405 posts)
68. Her name is a household word.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 11:29 AM
Sep 2015

Not so with Bernie. That's a big hurdle to overcome without big donors.

The only thing that will stop Hillary will be if another shoe drops in the emails case. For example, if any messages are ever discovered that show that she was trading State Department favors for donations for the Clinton Foundation and Bill's speeches. Check out this article on the subject by Bernie supporter David Sirota here:

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

 

Bounzer

(41 posts)
70. Two conservative blogs commission a poll where Sanders leads Clinton
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 03:49 PM
Sep 2015
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/09/22/hot-airtownhall-poll-for-september-trump-plateaus-hillary-down-7-to-sanders/

Most likely, this is an attempt to pretend that the Democratic front runner (whom. Conservatives have always despised) has fallen.

BigDemVoter

(4,149 posts)
74. I may have my preferences between Clinton, Biden, and Sanders. . . .
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 11:06 AM
Sep 2015

But I am voting for whichever one wins the nomination.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: Clinton's lead over...