Japan kept no record of talks over revised constitution, report says
Source: UPI
Japan did not leave a record of discussions regarding its reinterpretation of the country's pacifist constitution, making it harder in the future to verify how the change took place.
Tokyo's Cabinet Legislation Bureau said Monday the dialogue that was held before July 1, 2014, was not on record, Kyodo News reported. Instead, on June 30, 2014, the day prior to the Cabinet's reinterpretation, the bureau told Japan's National Security Council that it had "no comment" on the constitution's reinterpretation.
The bureau is responsible for producing explicit records of legal screenings, the Mainichi Shimbun reported. The lack of documentation on a historic decision has drawn criticism from analysts including Shinichi Nishikawa, professor of politics at Meiji University, who said he is "appalled" at the absence of records.
<snip>
The Cabinet Legislation Bureau plays the role of applying a brake on government decisions, but Nishikawa said the agency has "apparently lost that function."
Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2015/09/28/Japan-kept-no-record-of-talks-over-revised-constitution-report-says/7701443452388/
Right-wing fascist neocons forced this through, gosh I wonder why they would do that?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)it's time to take the gloves off.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)outside of my train station this morning.
Here are lots of Japanese YouTube videos opposed to changing Japan's pacifist constitution:
https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=%E6%88%A6%E4%BA%89%E3%81%AB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%81%9B%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&hl=ja#q=%E6%88%A6%E4%BA%89%E3%81%AB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%81%9B%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84&hl=ja&tbm=vid
bananas
(27,509 posts)Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Constitution of War
Prime Minister Shinzo Abes end-run around the Japanese Constitution is shameful and unpopular. So why is Washington allowing Japan to ready its troops?
By Bruce Ackerman, Tokujin Matsudaira
September 28, 2015
The Japanese Constitutions famous Article 9, or Peace Article, renounce[s] war and the threat or use of force. Despite this solemn commitment, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe wants to authorize Japans military to engage in preemptive attacks, alongside the United States, against aggressive actions by China, the Islamic State, or other forces that might ultimately threaten Japans security. With President Barack Obama cheering him on, Abe is engaged in an illegal frontal assault on Japans constitution.
If Abe had the legislative support he needed, he could have done this legally. Indeed, the constitution provides the prime minister a straightforward way to amend the Peace Article. The Japanese Diet is composed of two branches: the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors. Both must approve a proposed amendment by a two-thirds vote. If Abe were to win the support of both branches, that would have obliged him to place his proposal before the general public and persuade a simple majority to adopt it at a special referendum.
Yet Abe couldnt even gain the parliamentary support he needed to make his case before the Japanese people. His Liberal Democratic Party might have been able to surmount the two-thirds requirement in the House of Representatives if his junior coalition partner, Komeito, had gone along. But Komeito is rooted in the Buddhist community and would have had difficulty renouncing its pacifist principles. In any event, the LDP-Komeito coalition only controlled 55 percent of the House of Councillors and so a formal amendment was plainly beyond the prime ministers grasp.
Upon taking office in December 2012, Abe responded to his predicament by attempting to amend the constitution to allow a simple majority in both houses to trigger a referendum. But after a six-month effort, his initiative proved to be a political non-starter. He then embarked on an end-run around the nations supreme law, proposing sweeping military legislation that defied traditional understandings of the Peace Article.
<snip>
Nevertheless, it is far too soon for Abe to declare victory. His ham-fisted tactics are already uniting the opposition parties to run on a common platform opposing his military ambitions in their 2016 campaign for the House of Councillors. The Japanese Supreme Court may also intervene. While the justices have been reluctant to strike down legislation in the past, they have never before confronted such a brazenly unconstitutional initiative. In an unprecedented move, Shigeru Yamaguchi, a retired chief justice, publicly condemned the governments efforts at justification as nonsense and plans have already been announced for a major litigation effort.
<snip>
bemildred
(90,061 posts)That sounds like the kind of "democracy" we like to export all right.