Top U.S. VW Exec Blames 'A Couple of Software Engineers' for Scandal
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
Volkwagen's top executive in the U.S. told lawmakers on Thursday that cheating on emissions with the use of software in diesel cars was not a corporate decision, but something that "individuals did."
"This was a couple of software engineers who put this in for whatever reason," Michael Horn, VW's U.S. head, said about the software code designed to cheat on emissions tests, which the company put in diesel cars since 2009.
"This was not a corporate decision. There was no board meeting that approved this," he added later, under questioning by members of the House of Representatives Oversight and Investigations panel.
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/business/autos/vw-scandal-top-u-s-exec-offers-sincere-apology-cheating-n440971
No one is to blame...... just a couple of bad apples.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Software coders wouldn't have put this in without being told to. There was zero to gain for them by so doing, but a heck of a lot to gain (or lose) by execs and shareholders.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Mercedes-Benz, Honda, Mazda and Mitsubishis cars are shown to emit significantly more NOx pollution on the road than in regulatory tests
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/09/mercedes-honda-mazda-mitsubishi-diesel-emissions-row?CMP=twt_gu
LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)emissions whatever it took. But since so many companies did it, it had to be very upper level. Definitely board approved.
groundloop
(11,514 posts)It's been known for quite a while that EPA test protocols did a poor job of simulating real world conditions. As far as I know there hasn't been any proof (or even allegations) that any car company besides VW has cheated on the testing.
FSogol
(45,452 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Mercedes-Benz, Honda, Mazda and Mitsubishi have joined the growing list of manufacturers whose diesel cars are known to emit significantly more pollution on the road than in regulatory tests, according to data obtained by the Guardian.
Wide range of cars emit more pollution in realistic driving tests, data shows
In more realistic on-road tests, some Honda models emitted six times the regulatory limit of NOx pollution while some unnamed 4x4 models had 20 times the NOx limit coming out of their exhaust pipes.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/09/mercedes-honda-mazda-mitsubishi-diesel-emissions-row?CMP=twt_gu
FSogol
(45,452 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)had to be a plot.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)I doubt anyone actually wrote down that something illegal should be done. There are far too many ways to state such without actually saying so. Always leaving oneself plausible deniability.
FSogol
(45,452 posts)I'm sure those engineers put it on the record somehow.
mpcamb
(2,868 posts)Hah!
uawchild
(2,208 posts)Damn, it's always these bad apple low level employees going rouge messing things up for the honest law-abiding corporate CEOs.
DemoTex
(25,391 posts)Enron redux.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)and it's always accuses "out-of-control" technical employees. For your protection, keep a daily diary that includes instructions to you with comments you returned and an updated copy of those stored in another location. Also, keep all original communications. Important to keep these items off your employer's property and where only you and a trusted person can get to them. Don't be a sap for criminal management.
RobinA
(9,886 posts)And I'm not even a scientist or engineer. Worked for a corporate legal dept. I ran into the file awhile back and wondered if I had been overly paranoid. Probably not.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)We all know how software coders love to build lies into their code in order to reap larger profits for their corporate masters.
Good luck with the blame-shifting, Michael Horn.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Not a chance.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)0rganism
(23,930 posts)an expected response, blaming the faceless shmoos who implemented the offending code, but "a couple of software engineers" don't just "put this in for whatever reason." that's not how software occurs in a manufacturing environment.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,546 posts)eom
yellowcanine
(35,694 posts)JudyM
(29,204 posts)Senior management can still approve and yes, direct, operations like this... Though of course they *should* clear anything of questionable legality with the board.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)nooooooooooooo
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,140 posts)When the software is changed to keep the emission control engaged all of the time?
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Yavin4
(35,421 posts)Cause they just threw the tech guys right underneath one.
daleo
(21,317 posts)The bosses are mere dupes of the peons. Sure.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,546 posts)Couple a engineers, sittin' at the bar havin' a few beers decide to write a program to accomplish this. I wonder how they'd answer the question, how was it tested so they'd know it worked? I mean, did they get some techs to do it and keep it all a secret from senior management?
The story stinks to high heaven and disappoints me as I always put VW on a pedestal as great engineering, etc. Now we find out they are cheaters.
Nac Mac Feegle
(969 posts)BULLSHIT !!!!!