Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:02 PM May 2012

Cops, Witnesses Back Up George Zimmerman's Version of Trayvon Martin Shooting

Last edited Fri May 18, 2012, 12:36 PM - Edit history (3)

Source: ABC News

Two police reports written the night that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin said that Zimmerman had a bloody face and nose, according to police reports made public today.

The reports also note that two witness accounts appear to back up Zimmerman's version of what happened when they describe a man on his back with another person wearing a hoodie straddling him and throwing punches.

It has been such a contentious case that even the evidence is being disputed.

The police report states that Trayvon Martin's father told an investigator after listening to 911 tapes that captured a man's voice frantically callling for help that it was not his son calling for help.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/cops-witnesses-back-george-zimmermans-version/story?id=16371852&singlePage=true



Previous title: "Trayvon Martin Had Drugs in System, Autopsy Found" - now ABC has shoved the THC fact very far down in the article.
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cops, Witnesses Back Up George Zimmerman's Version of Trayvon Martin Shooting (Original Post) alp227 May 2012 OP
again: so? Skittles May 2012 #1
okay but THC and violence? CreekDog May 2012 #2
THC would make him want to bum some chips off someone not attack them. yurbud May 2012 #82
Soo...he'd smoked pot, got the munchies for Skittles Roland99 May 2012 #3
Unfortunately, we don't know what Zimmerman was on, other than a power rush. Hoyt May 2012 #4
Oh my, he smoked a joint sometime in the last 30 days before he was murdered notadmblnd May 2012 #5
Thc tests positive for up to 30 days. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #6
Wow, he smoked some pot. If zimmerman would have he would have been more mellow, Dont call me Shirley May 2012 #7
error in the story? grasswire May 2012 #8
Yeah. NOLALady May 2012 #20
So Trayvon was drug tested but Zimmerman was not azurnoir May 2012 #9
Trayvons test was SOP Meiko May 2012 #31
Don't know about Zimmerman and 'scripts but you'd think azurnoir May 2012 #35
Fourth Amendment Travelman May 2012 #73
Nice try, but someone else reported Florida law in another thread that says if you Solomon May 2012 #79
This I'd like to see Travelman May 2012 #84
A 17 year-old who smokes pot? Who ever heard of such a thing? Ian David May 2012 #10
KILL HIM WITH FIRE! XemaSab May 2012 #11
Where's Zimmerman's drug test? Politicalboi May 2012 #12
We will not get one either Scairp May 2012 #86
Pubic hair WCGreen May 2012 #87
I've Never Seen the MSM go to such lengths to cover a murder's ass fascisthunter May 2012 #13
I notice you left out President Obama. Like me, you must be OK with him targeting 24601 May 2012 #21
WTF brush May 2012 #29
Please read post #13 - to which I replied. 24601 May 2012 #85
whatever you say coockoo bird fascisthunter May 2012 #36
A lot of kids smoke weed in high school Cali_Democrat May 2012 #14
Ah, "Reefer madness" Canuckistanian May 2012 #15
Over half of high schoolers probably would fail a THC drug test DaveJ May 2012 #16
I'll never smoke weed with WIllie again,,,,, benld74 May 2012 #17
Full Ignore stonecutter357 May 2012 #18
OH TEH NOES! MARRY-JEW-WANNA, TEH KILLER DRUGZ! slackmaster May 2012 #19
But for the War on Drugs, THC would be a non-issue SkatmanRoth May 2012 #22
Yep they are going to let him skate on this zeemike May 2012 #23
even *if* he had just smoked a joint, THC is not associated Scout May 2012 #24
The problem for the prosecution is that the finding validates something Zimmerman said in his call slackmaster May 2012 #25
Zimmerman is still the murderer. Woody Woodpecker May 2012 #26
Zimmerman is not the police officer or the community watch-person at that time... Lost-in-FL May 2012 #27
Zimmerman sounded like he was on drugs in those calls, did he get tested ? JI7 May 2012 #28
what are zimmerman's qualifications for determining whether someone is "on drugs or something?" frylock May 2012 #39
I don't see anything proving that Martin was a "f---- coon", do you? CreekDog May 2012 #48
Nope. Read this bit. "such a low level...would have played no role in Martin's behavior..." uppityperson May 2012 #55
I'm not saying that it could have made any difference in TM's behavior. slackmaster May 2012 #57
If it didn't affect his behavior, he wouldn't look "like he's on drugs" is my point. uppityperson May 2012 #70
and what the hell has that got to do with anything? JitterbugPerfume May 2012 #30
Argues AGAINST his being the aggressor. kestrel91316 May 2012 #32
Not to cast asparagus on a region or state, but do you really expect Florida jurors to know that? slackmaster May 2012 #33
Well, anyone who has ever used pot will be thrown off the jury by the prosecution, so kestrel91316 May 2012 #34
Exactly. Also, hopefully, anyone who thinks it makes black men rape white women. slackmaster May 2012 #56
Zimmerman did have drugs in his system classykaren May 2012 #37
So he was all cranked out on speed obamanut2012 May 2012 #47
With no drug test, how can that be known? Travelman May 2012 #74
Grass makes people aggressive? Who knew? AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #38
Well, if you're standing between me and that plate of cookies ... JustABozoOnThisBus May 2012 #81
Trayvon was pursued and attacked by an armed guy - he had a right to defend himself. Cass May 2012 #40
So a paranoid, racist, gun-toting 28 year old Moses2SandyKoufax May 2012 #41
No... it doesn't prove anything. -..__... May 2012 #51
you took a harder line with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. than with George Zimmerman CreekDog May 2012 #83
justice American style.... unkachuck May 2012 #42
It is obvious that TomClash May 2012 #43
The title and article don't match the one at the link: Rhiannon12866 May 2012 #44
fixed. alp227 May 2012 #49
Thank you so much! K&R! Rhiannon12866 May 2012 #54
Trace amount of THC -- big frigging deal obamanut2012 May 2012 #45
Character assasination! Odin2005 May 2012 #46
How can the aggressor claim self defense? 6000eliot May 2012 #50
ding ding ding Evasporque May 2012 #75
Nice unbiased headline Nine May 2012 #52
ABC has been trying to sew this up for awhile Blue_Tires May 2012 #59
Why is the 'mainstream media' covering for a murderer Boabab May 2012 #53
some good points here: Blue_Tires May 2012 #61
I dont get this obsession with this case BigD_95 May 2012 #58
If you don't get the "obsession", then you've clearly never known the distinct pleasure of Blue_Tires May 2012 #60
really? BigD_95 May 2012 #62
ok...I'll play Blue_Tires May 2012 #64
Ironic, isn't it? NoGOPZone May 2012 #63
They don't have a leg to stand on and they know it Blue_Tires May 2012 #65
There is evidence that conflicts with Zimmerman's account neohippie May 2012 #67
"Martin had no marks from being attacked." Tommy_Carcetti May 2012 #68
Mob mentality. L0oniX May 2012 #69
Funny you mention that... Blue_Tires May 2012 #77
If I was being followed by a stranger at night I'd fight him, too, if he got close enough wordpix May 2012 #66
So can you start a fight, then when you start losing that fight, use deadly force . . . The Stranger May 2012 #71
No, that is not true and I don't believe anyone is claiming so slackmaster May 2012 #72
Apparently in Florida the laws are confusing neohippie May 2012 #78
I had thought that they removed the requirement that the aggressor withdraw. The Stranger May 2012 #80
and 2 witnesses make it a hate crime magical thyme May 2012 #76

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
3. Soo...he'd smoked pot, got the munchies for Skittles
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:04 PM
May 2012

and then threatened a random person out of nowhere, beat him to a pulp (according to said random stranger) and got himself shot "out of defense" in the process?


I.

Don't.

Fucking.

Think.

So.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
5. Oh my, he smoked a joint sometime in the last 30 days before he was murdered
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:06 PM
May 2012

So I'm sure he deserved to die

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
7. Wow, he smoked some pot. If zimmerman would have he would have been more mellow,
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:06 PM
May 2012

posssibly saving Trayvon's life.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
8. error in the story?
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:07 PM
May 2012

"The teen, who lived in Miami, was in Sanford while serving a suspension for a bag of marijuana being discovered in his possession."

Wasn't it just residue?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
9. So Trayvon was drug tested but Zimmerman was not
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:11 PM
May 2012

what's wrong with this picture?

and they found THC in Trayvon's system well stop the presses OMG and such like

one can only wonder what they would have found in Zimmerman's system

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
31. Trayvons test was SOP
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:14 PM
May 2012

for an autopsy especially when you have a homicide investigation. I have no idea why Zimmerman wasn't tested. He had a prescription for a couple of drugs didn't he?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
35. Don't know about Zimmerman and 'scripts but you'd think
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:39 PM
May 2012

a drug test would also be SOP for someone who had just killed another person

Travelman

(708 posts)
73. Fourth Amendment
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:20 PM
May 2012

The police would have to have probable cause to get a warrant to perform a drug test on Zimmerman. If he was not showing any overt signs of being impaired/intoxicated (slurring, smell of alcohol in the case of alcohol, glassy eyes, etc.) then they would not be able to get a test even if they wanted to. I've read, as far as I can tell, every police report, etc. out there attached to this case (that has been made public, anyway), and I have never seen any indication by any of the police officers involved that they had any cause to think that Zimmerman was impaired.

As such, no drug test.

Solomon

(12,310 posts)
79. Nice try, but someone else reported Florida law in another thread that says if you
Fri May 18, 2012, 03:46 PM
May 2012

wind up killing someone, for whatever reason, you gotta be drug tested. If holding a smoking gun over a dead teenager is not probable cause, then there's no such thing as probable cause.

Travelman

(708 posts)
84. This I'd like to see
Fri May 18, 2012, 05:29 PM
May 2012

I've scoured high and low to find the proof that this is "standard procedure" as many have called it. EVERY cop I've talked to (and that's actually quite a few homicide investigators, due to the nature of my work) has, to a person, told me that if they were the one working the case, with the information that was available (which they all agreed was not nearly a complete picture at all), they would not have even tried to get a warrant, and that they would never, EVER do a test without a warrant for fear it would be thrown out of court.

Is there a link to this post somewhere?

Scairp

(2,749 posts)
86. We will not get one either
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:39 PM
May 2012

I'd say test his hair but since his head is shaved you cannot get a drug analysis from him, ever. Very convenient for him. And I didn't know that being a teenager who had smoked pot at some point in the previous 30 days was a capital offense. Sorry, I guess we let Mr. Zimmerman get on with his life, armed and chasing young black men who happen to walk down the street in his neighborhood looking "suspicious". And wearing hoodies. Why don't they save this stuff for court? I don't understand why so much is being made public by the authorities. They are going to have to move this trial, and even then I don't know how they will ever find a jury who hasn't been inundated with stories on this case. It will be a challenge to get a verdict.

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
13. I've Never Seen the MSM go to such lengths to cover a murder's ass
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:18 PM
May 2012

oh wait... George Bush, Cheney, Kissinger, etc.... never mind.

If pot was what he smoked, it is now harder to believe Trayvon initiated any fight. You do not become violent under the influence of pot.

24601

(3,959 posts)
21. I notice you left out President Obama. Like me, you must be OK with him targeting
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:51 PM
May 2012

US Citizens with hellfire missiles.

Keep up the good work.

brush

(53,767 posts)
29. WTF
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:11 PM
May 2012

What the he ll are you going on about? The thread is Martin having THC in his system, aka pot, the mellowing, non-violent drug.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
14. A lot of kids smoke weed in high school
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:22 PM
May 2012

This means nothing and has nothing to do with the incident that night.

benld74

(9,904 posts)
17. I'll never smoke weed with WIllie again,,,,,
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:40 PM
May 2012

Attacking someone while he has THC in his system? Really defense, that all u got? With ALL the crap your guy did in the past?



CAPITAL b CAPITAL s.

SkatmanRoth

(843 posts)
22. But for the War on Drugs, THC would be a non-issue
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:07 PM
May 2012

The War on Drugs now indirectly claims another victim. I've been told the Government is here to serve the people. What I am at a loss to understand is why the people let the Government force us to abide by the War on Drugs, The Department of Homeland Security, and the Patriot Act.

These Government policies has turn us into suspicious, armed vigilantes who shoot strangers walking through the neighborhood.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
23. Yep they are going to let him skate on this
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:07 PM
May 2012

And this was predicted by many here.
There will be a steady drip drip of information coming out and they will never mention the other evidence like witnesses at all...soon the waters will be muddied enough for the judge to dismiss it all.

Scout

(8,624 posts)
24. even *if* he had just smoked a joint, THC is not associated
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:10 PM
May 2012

with aggressive, violent behavior.

and, he could have smoked or otherwise consumed pot for the last time loooong before the night he was killed.

besides, he's the victim; he's the one who is dead, i don't see why it matters if he did have THC in his system.

 

Woody Woodpecker

(562 posts)
26. Zimmerman is still the murderer.
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:52 PM
May 2012

Once he left his car, all presumptions of SYG falls under Martin, not Zimmerman.

And it doesn't matter what Zimmerman says - because he could easily be lying to the police dispatcher on what happened.

Lost-in-FL

(7,093 posts)
27. Zimmerman is not the police officer or the community watch-person at that time...
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:59 PM
May 2012

his statement is irrelevant.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
48. I don't see anything proving that Martin was a "f---- coon", do you?
Thu May 17, 2012, 10:26 PM
May 2012

or are you cherry picking the report to find something that's true?

on the premise that liars lie 100% of the time?

fascinating level of naivete.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
55. Nope. Read this bit. "such a low level...would have played no role in Martin's behavior..."
Fri May 18, 2012, 02:23 AM
May 2012
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2018232093_apusneighborhoodwatch.html
Martin's autopsy indicated that medical examiners found THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, when they tested Martin's blood and urine. The amount described in the autopsy report is such a low level that it would have played no role in Martin's behavior, said Larry Kobilinsky, a professor of forensic science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York.

"This kind of level can be seen days after somebody smokes," Kobilinsky said. "If it comes up in the case, I would be surprised. It wouldn't benefit the defense, it wouldn't benefit the prosecution, and if the defense tried to bring it up, the judge would keep it out."
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
57. I'm not saying that it could have made any difference in TM's behavior.
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:09 AM
May 2012

I'm saying the mere mention of an illegal drug will influence how the trial goes, if there is a trial.

It also doesn't make life any easier for Trayvon's parents.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
70. If it didn't affect his behavior, he wouldn't look "like he's on drugs" is my point.
Fri May 18, 2012, 12:58 PM
May 2012
The problem for the prosecution is that the finding validates something Zimmerman said in his call

Second sentence.

"This guy looks like he's up to no good, like he's on drugs or something."

Knowing your dead son had smoked some pot in the last 3 months I bet falls way down in difficulty dealing with for Tray's parents than having him killed.
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
33. Not to cast asparagus on a region or state, but do you really expect Florida jurors to know that?
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:22 PM
May 2012

I don't.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
34. Well, anyone who has ever used pot will be thrown off the jury by the prosecution, so
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:35 PM
May 2012

I suppose the jury they wind up with will be clueless.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
56. Exactly. Also, hopefully, anyone who thinks it makes black men rape white women.
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:08 AM
May 2012

But there is no guarantee.

I'm just lamenting that although it really makes no difference, the perceptions and prejudices that people have will make the prosecution's job more difficult.

classykaren

(769 posts)
37. Zimmerman did have drugs in his system
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:55 PM
May 2012

I live in Florida they announced on the news Zimmerman had adderal and a sleeping medication in his system.

Travelman

(708 posts)
74. With no drug test, how can that be known?
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:25 PM
May 2012

I think this is probably inaccurate information. We know from his doctor's statement that he had an Rx for these drugs, but that doesn't mean that he had any in his system at the time of the shooting.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
81. Well, if you're standing between me and that plate of cookies ...
Fri May 18, 2012, 04:15 PM
May 2012

I'm sure it makes a few people aggressive. Not me, I just get sorta catatonic. I might be to lethargic to bother reaching for the cookies.

But still, not worth shooting anybody over.



Cass

(2,600 posts)
40. Trayvon was pursued and attacked by an armed guy - he had a right to defend himself.
Thu May 17, 2012, 08:53 PM
May 2012

From Trayvon's perspective Zimmerman was a strange man following him, harassing him and looking to start trouble. The injuries to Zimmerman simply prove that Trayvon attempted to defend himself against a threat to his life.

I'm finding it pretty hard to get worked up about some pot in Trayvon's system. Its not a justification for killing him. We all know he was simply walking home minding his own business when this raging nut came out of nowhere and attacked him. Whether he smoked a joint at some point prior to that is irrelevant.

Moses2SandyKoufax

(1,290 posts)
41. So a paranoid, racist, gun-toting 28 year old
Thu May 17, 2012, 09:13 PM
May 2012

with a history of violence and criminal behavior is viewed by a significant portion of society as LESS threatening than a black 17 year old with no history of violence?!

Post-racial America indeed

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
51. No... it doesn't prove anything.
Thu May 17, 2012, 11:08 PM
May 2012
From Trayvon's perspective Zimmerman was a strange man following him, harassing him and looking to start trouble. The injuries to Zimmerman simply prove that Trayvon attempted to defend himself against a threat to his life.


As of right now, no one here knows when, where, how and more importantly by whom any perceived threat and contact initiated any response in between the time Zimmerman lost visual contact with Martin and a scuffle ensued.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
83. you took a harder line with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. than with George Zimmerman
Fri May 18, 2012, 04:27 PM
May 2012

and only one of them actually shot an unarmed kid.

hmmm.

priorities and biases.

 

unkachuck

(6,295 posts)
42. justice American style....
Thu May 17, 2012, 09:33 PM
May 2012

....when all is said and done, they're going to magically turn the victim into the perpetrator....

Rhiannon12866

(205,233 posts)
44. The title and article don't match the one at the link:
Thu May 17, 2012, 09:56 PM
May 2012
Cops, Witnesses Back Up George Zimmerman's Version of Trayvon Martin Shooting

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
45. Trace amount of THC -- big frigging deal
Thu May 17, 2012, 10:20 PM
May 2012

What did Zimmerman have in his system?

And, how does Trayvon getting stoned, or being around some stoners, a week or two or three earlier have anything to do with him being murdered???

Evasporque

(2,133 posts)
75. ding ding ding
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:41 PM
May 2012

ZImmerman sought out confrontation, tracked Martin down against dispatcher request, shot and killed an innocent person after provoking a self defense confrontation....

2nd degree...Zimmerman started and finished it.

Had Zimmerman not followed and approached Martin in a threatening enough manner to provoke defense, would Martin still of confronted him....

Martin was not doing anything and Zimmerman was not authorized to stalk him and confront him.

Nine

(1,741 posts)
52. Nice unbiased headline
Thu May 17, 2012, 11:28 PM
May 2012

No need for a trial. ABC News has the case all sewn up. Everyone can go home now.

Boabab

(120 posts)
53. Why is the 'mainstream media' covering for a murderer
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:12 AM
May 2012

and directing a stream of character assassinations against the innocent victim?

The gun lobby isn't that powerful, is it? Does this blatantly biased coverage have to do with GZ's roots?

Racial bias continues to be a huge problem in this country, but you'd think that the media might have some sympathy towards an innocent child who was killed in cold blood, or empathy toward his family.

Apparently, there's none of that.

 

BigD_95

(911 posts)
58. I dont get this obsession with this case
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:19 AM
May 2012

and the lengths to which people will continue to say Zimmerman is guilty with out the trial.


The more evidence that comes out it looks more and more like Zimmerman story is true. Its like people were all outraged & marching around all because a black teenage was shot by what appeared to be a white guy & the police did nothing. Now its like the police/DA were forced to press charges for what will be a case that will be thrown out or Zimmerman will get off.

People should just admit they jumped into this too quick. Look at the pictures

http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/18/justice/florida-teen-shooting-details/

It was obvious that Zimmerman was attacked. Also Zimmerman didn't hit him back. Martin had no marks from being attacked.


Evidence: Zimmerman:

" His back was wet and soiled, as if he'd been in grass."

This proves that Zimmerman was on his back with Martin on top. The pictures prove that Zimmerman's story about getting his head slammed into the ground are true. Also the broken nose that police statements said looked like was broken that night.



Also

" And on one 911 call, placed by a neighbor, a police sergeant counted one man yelling "help!" or "help me!" 14 times in a span of 38 seconds.
Who was yelling? When the 911 calls were later played back for him and he was asked if they were from his son, an emotional Tracy Martin "quietly responded 'no'.""


I think Martins own dad could tell if it was his son or not that was yelling help.


Martin was a problem teenage:

"Yet by that winter night, he'd been there for seven days, after being suspended for the third time from Dr. Michael M. Krop High School in Miami, in this instance, for 10 days after drug residue was found in his backpack, according to records obtained by the Miami Herald."


Does this mean he should have been killed? Hell no! But it shows what kind of kid he was and what kind of mind set he had. Which to me shows that he could have started attacking Zimmerman when he was being followed.


This whole thing sucks and Martin should not have lost his life. But Zimmerman probably did act in self defense. Or at least with accordance with the law. Right now the witch hunt is anyway to try and convict Zimmerman because of all the people in the streets protesting. I thought we didn't live by mob rules anymore.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
60. If you don't get the "obsession", then you've clearly never known the distinct pleasure of
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:55 AM
May 2012

Walking/Driving/Breathing while Black...Zimmerman was still the aggressor here, and he was the first one to commit a criminal act...

And it took national media pressure for the police to even pretend to investigate at first...

"Martin was a problem teenager?" Zimmerman was a screw-up and wasn't exactly an upstanding model citizen himself

 

BigD_95

(911 posts)
62. really?
Fri May 18, 2012, 10:04 AM
May 2012

***d he was the first one to commit a criminal act... ***



what was the criminal act he committed? Unless he didnt shoot him in self defense and even then it sounds like he was assaulted first. So what criminal act did he commit?

Zimmerman is with in his rights to follow who ever he wants as long as he doesnt impose on that persons rights. If he thinks a guy looks odd and follows him to see where he goes while the police are coming. He has that right.



**If you don't get the "obsession", then you've clearly never known the distinct pleasure of

Walking/Driving/Breathing while Black***

and dont give me that crap line. Black teens & adults are murdered everyday. Some by police themselves. I dont see people marching all over for them. I get no life should be cut short.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
64. ok...I'll play
Fri May 18, 2012, 10:57 AM
May 2012

I could say Zimmerman is guilty of whatever law Florida has on the books against stalking/intimidation/harassment in addition to knowingly making a false 911 call, and violating Martin's civil rights...And why did he even follow someone who wasn't committing a crime in the first place? Care to answer that one if you can??

Good to know you see racial profiling as a "crap line" -- Lets me know exactly where you're coming from and where you stand...After all, we won't be followed/stopped/frisked if we're not doing anything wrong, right??

And thanks for advancing the "black men are shot dead on the street everyday, so what's one more?" meme, as if I don't hear that everyday where I live...And for the record, nine times out of ten when an innocent black teen ends up dead at the hands of police or a concerned citizen, they're always able to explain it away because he was a nobody or a drug addict or had a criminal record, etc...So they usually get away with it and nary a person asks a question...

That's why this case has put such a great bug up the ass of the media and suburban America -- It doesn't fit the official, pre-defined narrative and it's impossible to resonate in their minds that Martin was completely innocent... "But he must have been doing SOMETHING to deserve it!" they all cry as they grasp at straws...Young black male+walking alone at night in a gated community+hooded sweatshirt = Hardcore hustler/dealer/gangbanger; and they don't like situations that fuck with that equation... The hardcore gun-nutters, who I'm pretty sure are responsible for sending a troll army to DU, are up in arms (heh) because their constitutional right to perforate without question anyone who looks suspicious is being challenged (remember the equation)...

NoGOPZone

(2,971 posts)
63. Ironic, isn't it?
Fri May 18, 2012, 10:36 AM
May 2012

Martin's background is a cause for concern, Zimmerman's arrest record evidently isn't.

Martin's prints were run by police in an effort to ID him. They weren't in the database. That's evidence he was never in serious trouble with the law.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
65. They don't have a leg to stand on and they know it
Fri May 18, 2012, 11:04 AM
May 2012

Their only hope is to distort the issue to the point where the casual observer gets too confused to care

neohippie

(1,142 posts)
67. There is evidence that conflicts with Zimmerman's account
Fri May 18, 2012, 11:52 AM
May 2012

If you read this story... http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/us/trayvon-martin-case-shadowed-by-police-missteps.html

First of all there is evidence that conflicts with Zimmerman's account of the story.

Martin's girlfriends testimony is that she heard over the phone, Zimmerman say to Martin What are you doing here? and she heard Martin respond with Why are you following me?, this differs with Zimmerman's account of being jumped from behind, and then sucker punched in the face and jumped on while Martin held his hand over his mouth and held him down, reaching for his gun, while repeatedly hitting him and bashing his head into the concrete....

That account by Zimmerman, doesn't really add up to the one small scratch on Martin's knuckles, had he beaten him that badly surely his knuckles would have more damage, however it does add up to maybe a single punch by Martin that probably infuriated Zimmerman enough to fire his gun. There is more evidence that needs to be released before we can detemine what else may have occurred.

Secondly there were conflicting reports that night, as to who was screaming for help etc... and the neighborhood was not canvassed completely as Martin was shot just 70 yards from the house he was trying to get back to and had the police knocked on that door they would then have realized that Martin wasn't the prowler that they and Zimmerman thought he was.


Also, We know that Martin, was aware he was being followed, by Zimmerman in a white vehicle and that Martin went as far as to circle the vehicle staring at Zimmerman. and then in fear he fled, running away to avoid a confrontation, which demonstrates that he fulfilled his requirement in self defense to try to avoid the aggressor, If Zimmerman would have stayed in his car, as he was advised to do that would have been the end of any confrontation right there, but he clearly not afraid gets out of the car and pursues Martin, after being asked not to and acknowledging that advise with an okay...


At that point, Zimmerman had incorrectly profiled Martin, as one of the black teenagers breaking into houses, and assumed that he had no right to be in the gated community when he in fact had been staying there as a guest.

We know that Martin fled in the direction of the house he was staying in, but we still do not know if Martin, was grabbed or attempted to be detained by Zimmerman, as there are NO witnesses who said that they saw the beginning of the confrontation.


You say we don't live by mob rules anymore, but isn't Zimmerman taking justice into his own hands just that?

He was wrong as we now know that the Police felt that Martin was not committing any crime, he was aggressively pursued both by an unknown man in a vehicle and then later after trying to flee from his stalker, after the thought he got away, he is surprised by Zimmerman again, in the dark area behind the apartments, if I was surprised by someone, I might try to defend myself too, we don't know a lot of things because the Sanford police department, made many mistakes, on the night of the initial investigation, because they also felt like this was a clear case of a criminal getting caught but I'm sure that once that they realized that Martin, was a guest in the community and had every right to walk home, that they didn't feel so good about justice being served, and in fact the Police Chief has stated that what Zimmerman did was wrong, people are not supposed to try and do the job of the police, that is mob justice is it not?

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,174 posts)
68. "Martin had no marks from being attacked."
Fri May 18, 2012, 12:18 PM
May 2012

I was tempted to make a very saracastic, snippy response to this statement.

Instead, I'll just let you sit on it and think about what is very wrong, logically, about that statement.

Think about it....think about it....think about it.....

Has the light bulb popped up yet?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
77. Funny you mention that...
Fri May 18, 2012, 02:34 PM
May 2012

Southern history is full of stories of a certain "mob" and the type of justice they would mete out to "certain" kinds of people...

Maybe Zimmerman was just born in the wrong era...

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
66. If I was being followed by a stranger at night I'd fight him, too, if he got close enough
Fri May 18, 2012, 11:41 AM
May 2012

So even IF Trayvon threw some hard punches martial arts style, he may have thinking it was either that or get robbed/killed himself.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
71. So can you start a fight, then when you start losing that fight, use deadly force . . .
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:10 PM
May 2012

. . . under Florida law?

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
72. No, that is not true and I don't believe anyone is claiming so
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:13 PM
May 2012

It appears the defense will be that Trayvon started the fight, and that he did so without reasonable justification.

neohippie

(1,142 posts)
78. Apparently in Florida the laws are confusing
Fri May 18, 2012, 03:16 PM
May 2012

Here is an excerpt from Florida law that someone else posted in another thread about this same subject.



776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

I am not sure what this says, it looks like the initial aggressor can use justification as a defense if they believe that they are in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm, but then it also says other than use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant... so it's not really clear, any lawyers want to try an interpret this law?

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
80. I had thought that they removed the requirement that the aggressor withdraw.
Fri May 18, 2012, 03:59 PM
May 2012

Thanks for posting this.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
76. and 2 witnesses make it a hate crime
Fri May 18, 2012, 02:17 PM
May 2012

One heard someone yell "I've got a gun. I've got a gun. Take my gun away from me."

Another is adamant that there was no fighting going on when the gunshot went off.

Plus one witnesses saw two men chasing each other and described the location. That witness couldn't see details of the men, but described it as a chase, not following. I.e., running, which fits with Trayvon's girlfriend describing Trayvon as out of breath when he stopped trying to escape. It sort of makes Zimmerman clearly an aggressor.

And yet another witness saw a neighbor she couldn't identify ask a person lying on his back if he needed help and the person on his back said "Call 911." Seconds later, after she moved to a different room and window, she heard the pop of the gunshot.

Those 4 witnesses combined describe a scene in which Zimmerman chased Martin down until Martin was out of breath and turned to confront him. They got into a fight and with Martin clearly winning and Zimmerman crying for help, Martin stopped punching and asked if he needed help. Zimmerman told him to call 911 and then grabbed his gun, taunted him to try and take it away and then shot him.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cops, Witnesses Back Up G...