Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:46 PM Oct 2015

In Major Shift, New Guidelines Scale Back Breast Cancer Screenings For Younger Women

Source: Washington Post

By Ariana Eunjung Cha October 20 at 12:23 PM

New guidelines for mammograms released Tuesday by the American Cancer Society represent a significant step back from the aggressive early and universal screenings the country began 18 years ago.

The changes -- which include raising the age that a woman of average risk begin regular screening from 40 to 45 -- are a recognition of the growing concern that the benefits of mammograms may have been oversold as well as the anxiety and needless treatments caused by overdiagnosis and false positives from the tests.

Richard Wender, a member of the breast cancer guideline panel and a former president of the ACS, said that the new recommendations confirm that mammography is the most important thing a woman can do to reduce her chance of dying of breast cancer but that they provide a more “personalized and tailored approach.”

“Over the past couple of years, there has been so much confusion that some women and some clinicians have really lost confidence in mammography. We hope this extraordinary and thorough review will calm that worry,” Wender said.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/10/20/new-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines-take-more-conservative-approach-recognizing-need-to-balance-benefits-and-harms/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Major Shift, New Guidelines Scale Back Breast Cancer Screenings For Younger Women (Original Post) Purveyor Oct 2015 OP
Mammograms save lives. No one is forced to get a mammogram if they don't want one. Raising the still_one Oct 2015 #1
Cut down the incidence of breast cancer in younger Downwinder Oct 2015 #2
This is going to hit "Breast Health Centers" hard. irisblue Oct 2015 #3
This is a good move flamingdem Oct 2015 #4
Yep, people forget that mammograms CAUSE breast cancer too. Xithras Oct 2015 #10
They want to scale back prostate cancer tests, too. Lychee2 Oct 2015 #5
they're trying to "get rid of" mammograms? CreekDog Oct 2015 #11
Mammography doesn't work well in dense breast tissue. LeftyMom Oct 2015 #6
Save money, lose lives. Elmer S. E. Dump Oct 2015 #7
Yes. My breast cancer was found when 840high Oct 2015 #8
It's all about the 1% hoarders. Elmer S. E. Dump Oct 2015 #9

still_one

(92,181 posts)
1. Mammograms save lives. No one is forced to get a mammogram if they don't want one. Raising the
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 01:01 PM
Oct 2015

criteria from 40 to 45 in women who do not have a history of breast cancer in their family won't poise any significant risk I suspect.

irisblue

(32,969 posts)
3. This is going to hit "Breast Health Centers" hard.
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 01:09 PM
Oct 2015

as well as the hospitals who own them, Radiologists who read the films, Mammographers who do the films and set up for the biopsies, a ripple effect thru the health care delivery system.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
4. This is a good move
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 01:22 PM
Oct 2015

Excess radiation is a bad idea in my opinion.

In general better methods of detection should be developed.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
10. Yep, people forget that mammograms CAUSE breast cancer too.
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 07:23 PM
Oct 2015

It's a numbers game. The National Academy of Sciences released a study in 2012 estimating that roughly 2800 breast cancer cases each year are the result of medical radiation (mammography being one of the primary culprits). If early mammography saves 500 women a year by detecting cancer early, but causes 1000 new cases a year due to the radiation levels required by the test, then is the test really worthwhile?

And that's where the numbers game comes in. What percentage of those 2800 test-caused cancer cases involved women under 40? What percentage will be treatable? What percentage of the younger cancer cases will be treatable, and what percentage will die anyway? At what point does the math make sense, so that the overall number of women SAVED by early mammography exceeds the overall number of women killed by it?

ON EDIT:
The actual study info, in case anyone wants verification: http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2011/Breast-Cancer-and-the-Environment-A-Life-Course-Approach.aspx, http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2015/02/can-mammograms-cause-cancer/index.htm

 

Lychee2

(405 posts)
5. They want to scale back prostate cancer tests, too.
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 01:57 PM
Oct 2015
U.S. Panel Says No to Prostate Screening for Healthy Men

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/07/health/07prostate.html

They are trying to cut medical costs by getting rid of these tests (PSA, mammograms, etc.)

Not a good idea. These tests save lives.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
6. Mammography doesn't work well in dense breast tissue.
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 02:04 PM
Oct 2015

The farther you are from menopause the higher the risk of false positives.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In Major Shift, New Guide...