Sanders campaign: We'll consider Hillary for veep
Source: Politico
By DANIEL STRAUSS
Sen. Bernie Sanders' campaign once again cranked up its rhetoric toward former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by saying she could very well be on Vermont senator's shortlist for vice president once he clinched the Democratic nomination.
In an interview with Bloomberg Politics' John Heilemann, Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver was asked if he thought the Democratic front-runner was a "craven hypocrite" for moving to the left on a number of issues like the Keystone pipeline and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, effectively bringing her closer to the liberal Sanders on the political spectrum.
"A craven hypocrite?" Weaver responded with a grin described in the story as "sly." "That's a little bit harsh, don't you think?"
Weaver then added, "We're willing to give her more credit than Obama did. We're willing to consider her for vice president. We'll give her serious consideration. We'll even interview her."
FULL story at link.
AP Photo
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/bernie-sanders-will-consider-hillary-clinton-vp-215228
7962
(11,841 posts)And as I said at the time, now the numbers are starting to show it. One of the biggest reasons to vote for Bernie, his honesty & ethics, and he gives her a pass on it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Referring to Clinton as "Lady MacBeth" is an old rightwing talking point, based on a 1992 article from the far-right American Spectator labeling Clinton a Communist, titled "The Lady MacBeth of Little Rock."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Oct 28, 2015, 01:28 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is still DEMOCRATIC Underground.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Nasty comment, this needs to stop
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh, FFS. It's a joke. People are getting awfully thin-skinned around here.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Thanks Sanders!
merrily
(45,251 posts)As if she'd take VP anyway--and he knows that.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)She, however, declined early to be VP. That's why Obama didn't consider her.... she took her name out of the hat before he could. I don't think she'd accept VP if it was offered.
merrily
(45,251 posts)was that Biden was offered his choice of positions, but Ms.Biden nixed SOS because of the amount of travel that would be involved. She did not want Joe to be away from home that much.
However, what actually happened 8 years ago is not the point of this thread. The point of this thread is what Sanders recently said and what he meant by it. I don't think he was serious at all. "We'll even interview her." Come on.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Probably should have left that sexism card in the discard pile, eh Hillary?
Seriously though, if she is on the ticket it would galvanize Republicans to vote. the best chance Democrats have of keeping the White House and providing coattails for other races is to shuffle her majesty out of this completely.
merrily
(45,251 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)The 'Not Hillary' Party's bad weeks are stretching into months.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)Practically an endorsement!
onehandle
(51,122 posts)March is sooner that we think.
karynnj
(59,502 posts)not ask her. So -- two ways this is distanced - it was not Bernie Sanders and the word used was "considered".
Here, what I think more relevant is that the Bloomberg reporter tried to push the negative characterization of HRC on Bernie's campaign manager -- who rejected it - and then JOKED that they would consider her for VP. (In fact, the slam is reminding people that Obama did not consider HRC as VP .)
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)But not for more than 2 seconds.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)As long as she remembers to walk three steps behind.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)And, I suspect, Bernie would ask Biden before Hillary.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)That delimits the rest of the statement quite a bit.
What was he going to say next? "Our initial interviews are e-mail questions." ??
Glad my job isn't parsing answers to questions like that LIVE on behalf of a Presidential candidate.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)They may have just been jovial, but the remark smacks of condescension. I remember when I was in high school all student organizations were always headed by a boy, and the girl got to be secretary. Things did not improve significantly when I entered the real world. Men in the top spot, women getting more recognition than a few generations ago, but often limited to the second spot. So for the Sanders campaign to condescendingly say they'd consider Hillary for the second spot probably does not communicate well with some women. I know it does not for me: indeed, it may have just pushed me closer to Hillary's camp. And I do NOT currently have a candidate for the primaries, and like both Bernie and Hillary for different reasons.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Talk about counting your chickens. The states that Sanders is ahead in are inconsequential at best. the rest he is way behind. Dumb statement.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)more than qualified.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)After 23 years of suffocating hope and preventing change on the national level, can't this servant of the 0.1% and her even more odious neoliberal Reagan-clone of a husband just make a graceful exit? Please?!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)tally of votes decide anyway who runs for president. I know they can both get along, I hope Mrs. Clinton says she would have Senator Sanders on her 'short list' too.