Erdogan says Hitler's Germany exemplifies effective presidential system
Source: Reuters
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, who is pushing for executive powers, cites Hitler's Germany as an example of an effective presidential system, in comments broadcast by Turkish media on Friday.
Erdogan wants to change the Turkish constitution to turn the ceremonial role of president into that of a chief executive, a Turkish version of the system in the United States, France or Russia.
Asked on his return from a visit to Saudi Arabia late on Thursday whether an executive presidential system was possible while maintaining the unitary structure of the state, he said: "There are already examples in the world. You can see it when you look at Hitler's Germany.
"There are later examples in various other countries," he told reporters, according to a recording broadcast by the Dogan news agency.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-erdogan-hitler-idUSKBN0UF1T820160101
#NotTheOnion
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)fit into what the Nazis thought a person should be.
I would say something about Armenia, but that might be going a little too far.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)His work habits were plain weird and led to a very confused government.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)and listened to his generals.
It's interesting to think about what might have happened if Germany defeated the Soviets. How would the outcome of the war have changed, if at all? How would history have changed?
Yupster
(14,308 posts)A fun short story is "The Phantom Tolbukhen" about a famous Soviet Marshall planning a counter offensive against the Germans in Russia.
It's only at the very end that you realize that the offensive he's diagramming isn't three Guards armies led by Kirov, Karpov and Ostrov, but actually him and the three guys. They're planning to attack a farmhouse in German-occupied Russia to get some food, long after the Germans conquered the Soviet Union winning the war. Very well written.
If you like this kind of stuff, Harry Turtledove's book "In the Presence of Mine Enemies" follows a Jewish family living in Berlin 50 years after Germany won WWII and WWIII (nuclear).
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)the German cop discovers what happened to the Jews in the Holocaust?
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)yes the German detective pieces together what is going on.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Some third party predicted Turkey will invade Iraq and Syria in 2016. Let's hope that's not true.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)It makes life easier for those of us who were trying to point this out.
christx30
(6,241 posts)about his final solution to the problem of the Kurds.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)death-driven megalomaniacs, then yes Hitler does come to mind.
But when I consider an "effective presidential system," Hitler does not come to mind.
johnfunk
(6,113 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)The Federal President of Germany is the head of state. He has the last word on every piece of legislation. But he doesn't get elected by the people. The parliamentarians come together and hash out some non-partisan, non-controversial figure with good moral standing who every major party can accept as head of state. It's not so much an election as it's inter-party diplomacy and negotiation.
The Federal Chancellor of Germany is the head of government. He is de facto the most powerful person in Germany, in executive terms. But he doesn't get elected by the people either. Even though each party says "This guy of ours should be Chancellor", you won't find his name on the ballot. The would-be Chancellor is hashed out with intra-party diplomacy and negotiation before the election and then elected by the new parliament after the election.
This situation was created on purpose to prevent another situation like when Hitler became President and Chancellor at the same time.
EDIT:
I didn't really read the OP and overlooked that he clearly refered to Hitler's version of the german presidential system.
dgibby
(9,474 posts)lovuian
(19,362 posts)who we've built up with weapons and his military is one of the largest in NATO
He's way more dangerous than Saddam Hussein
Yupster
(14,308 posts)The idea is that Turkey is made up of two major regions, one the coastal region with Istanbul and lots of islands. This is the most prosperous and most educated part of Turkey. Many families have close family ties to Europe.
The other part is Anatolia where people are much more poor and much less educated and much more religious.
The first group is having 1.7 babies per woman. The second group is having 5-6 babies per woman. The prediction was that presidents from now on would be elected by that second group rather than the first. Expect Turkey to become more and more religious and less and less European, and expect lots of Turkish professionals to be moving to Europe.
lovuian
(19,362 posts)The Sunday Times reports that Edmonds, whose whistleblowing efforts have been studiously ignored by what passes for the news media in American news media, approached the Rupert Murdoch-owned British paper a month ago after reading a report there that an Al-Qaeda leader had been training some of the 9-11 hijackers at a base in Turkey, a US NATO alley, under the noses of the Turkish military.
malthaussen
(17,187 posts)Shouldn't the "land of liberty" be opposed to tyrants?
-- Mal
still_one
(92,168 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)No thanks, not a chance until they boot this fascist out!
lark
(23,094 posts)Erdogan and Trump.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)The phrase, "unitary executive," was one that Cheney and the rest of the Bush regime loved to toss around. No matter how you parse it, it's nothing more than a convoluted euphemism for "DICTATOR."
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)The Russians have some very bad and very long memories of Hitler.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Coventina
(27,104 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)I'd probably get a visit from Agent Mike if I said what the Turkish people should do to Ergogan. As an American, I don't think even our strong executive system has served us well and that our country would be better off if the presidency as we know it were abolished. However, Erdogan now uses the Third Reich as a model for his plans. That, of course, was the wet dream of an unhinged tyrant. If Erdogan thinks that worked well for Germany, he needs a remedial history lesson.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)A Hell of a lot.
Lionel Mandrake
(4,076 posts)that you read the whole Reuters article, not just the OP, before you post. You will find that Erdogan did not praise Hitler.
treestar
(82,383 posts)saying he wanted a US style Presidency.
Lionel Mandrake
(4,076 posts)from Turkish to English. Or maybe Erdogan was careless in saying something that could easily be misconstrued as praise of Hitler.
Like most politicians, Erdogan wants all the power he can grab. Let's hope the opposition frustrates him.